A Clínica Psicológica Contemporânea como ação social

• Ano de defesa: 2015
• Autor(a) principal: Lima, Maria José
• Orientador(a): Macedo, Rosa Maria Stefanini de
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Psicologia: Psicologia Clínica
• Departamento: Psicologia
• País: BR
• Palavras-chave em Português: Pensamento sistêmico novo-paradigmático; Clínica Psicológica Contemporânea; Compromisso social
• Palavras-chave em Inglês: New-paradigmatic systemic thinking; Contemporary Psychological Clinic; Social commitment
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::PSICOLOGIA
• Link de acesso: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/15428

In foreseeing a psychological clinic in transformation, this study turns to the contemporary institutes whose practices and theoretical productions, based on the contributions of the New-Paradigmatic Systemic Thinking, see the social as transforming practice. By identifying its strategies and tools, it aims to understand the constructions and interactions of the social and the clinic involved in its practices, as well as the understanding of the social commitment of Psychology. This is a qualitative research with an interpretative approach, developed from field research and triangulation strategy. Three Institutes, which have been operating for over two decades, were invited to participate in this study. From them, three sources were selected for approximation and analysis: a documental source, through the Bylaws; statements given in interviews by active professionals in the area; and reflections of their practice in the form of published articles. For the interpretative analysis of the data, memos and categorizations of its contents, presented in 13 tables, were designed. Based on them, discussions were carried out in the dialog with reflections from authors who address the New- Paradigmatic Systemic Thinking, the Psychological Clinic and professional practices in situations of social vulnerability. The final analysis points at the potential of the encounter between Psychology and the Systemic Thinking, as a promoter of a movement in search of the expansion and extension of the actions of the Psychological Clinic, as well as of the increase of its transdisciplinary vocation. A repositioning of the psychologist can be observed: in the everyday practice of the participant institutes, the psychologist, in adopting a reflexive stance in a new concept of the clinical practices, helps to prevent the possible alienation of Psychology from social issues, thus generating the commitment and taking position when faced with legal issues, inequality and social development. The concept of social that emerges from this attitude contemplates the intersubjectivity, giving voice to the interconstituition between the social and the individual, promoting the development of a clinic that bears transforming practices in itself, with a high potential for being a multiplier. As an implication of its adoption, the Social Responsibility, is seen as Relational Responsibility, and it presents an evident inclusive outcome, made visible by constant care and effective inclusion of all. This study revealed a contemporary Psychological Clinic in transformation, expanded and more effective in its intentions of collaborating with society