Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2012 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Farah, Teresa Cristina Roberto |
Orientador(a): |
Safra, Gilberto |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Psicologia: Psicologia Clínica
|
Departamento: |
Psicologia
|
País: |
BR
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/15261
|
Resumo: |
From the author's career as a speech therapist and psychopedagogist, in clinical experience that spans over thirty years working in private practice, in the care of children, adolescents and adults, it was recognized in her practice characteristics traditionally referred to psychotherapy. From this experience, the researcher realized the importance of conceiving clinic primordially on empathy. Accordingly, the aim of this study is to describe this course of construction. Through this presentation, the author intends to discuss the clinical situation in terms of the empathy experienced by both the therapist and the patient. To this end, lt will be presented a synthesis of Edith Stein's contribution on the subject of empathy. Stein conceives the empathic phenomenon as originating, previous to the psychic event. Will also be brought in this research, syntheses of the theoretical contributions of Gilberto Safra, and Clare B. Winnicott, as well as some of Donald Winnicott's concepts. These authors converge with regard to the importance attached to issues peculiar to the human condition, and their theories are, in some ways, similar to Edith Stein's contribution on the empathic phenomenon. The central element of the kind of clinic here addressed, is empathy, pre-sent in the human encounter as possibility of constitution and healing. The work is inserted in a form of qualitative research. The clinical method was necessary, since the construction of knowledge proposed is born in the author's proffessional experience. From this, the researcher develops a dialogue with the reader and with the authors in whose theories finds resonances with her experiences. Through this dialogue, presents a clinical case which was paradigmatic of the questions that guided this work and that may be found in the clinical work of other researchers |