Bloco no poder e previdência social no Brasil: entre a “constituição cidadã” e a dominação política de classe desde a Assembleia Nacional Constituinte de 1987- 1988

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2019
Autor(a) principal: Ugino, Camila Kimie lattes
Orientador(a): Almeida, Lúcio Flávio Rodrigues de
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Tese
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em Ciências Sociais
Departamento: Faculdade de Ciências Sociais
País: Brasil
Palavras-chave em Português:
Palavras-chave em Inglês:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/22785
Resumo: The aim of this study is to analyze the structure and reforms of the Brazilian social security system since the Federal Constitution of 1988 was promulgated. From Nicos Poulantzas's theoretical formulations, he class relations in Brazil are analyzed in the period immediately after the constituent proceeding. This moment was important as a stage of disputes for the expansion of social rights, an historical claim from workers and popular movements. However, the bourgeois opposition to the military dictatorship directed the popular discontent to Congress and thus imposed serious limitations to the process of redemocratization. Furthermore, considering the process of financialized and neoliberal capitalist accumulation, especially from the mid-1970s, State political practices organized the hegemonic interests of the banking-financial bourgeois fraction. This process took place internationally and internally, at different time and under different conditions. In Brazil, unlike other countries, there was a diachrony between banking-financial capital hegemony and neoliberalism. This added to the advances of social struggles in the transition from dictatorship allowed interpretations that the rights of citizenship were conquered by its simply ratification in the constitutional text. The expression of neoliberal politics came from the mid-1990s with the implementation of a broad set of reforms. Under the auspices of multilateral institutions, privatization of state-owned enterprises, austerity fiscal policy, and pension reform have become imperatives for macroeconomic stability. In this historical framework that pension reforms were analyzed, highlighting the main changes that occurred for workers in the formal private labor market and for civil servants. The reduction in the value of benefits and the exacerbation of social security access criteria were important changes and the effect of which was to expand private supplementary pension. Another result was the expansion of pension funds, serving different interests: from union leaders to large financial institutions. The consequence has been the loss of social security rights and the continued accumulation of capital, dominated by “finance”