Análise do processo de formação de estratégias em organizações do terceiro setor: um estudo de caso em duas ONG’s comunitárias
Ano de defesa: | 2006 |
---|---|
Autor(a) principal: | |
Orientador(a): | |
Banca de defesa: | |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
Idioma: | por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul
Porto Alegre |
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Palavras-chave em Português: | |
Link de acesso: | http://hdl.handle.net/10923/1205 |
Resumo: | This present paper aims the understanding of the process of strategies formation within organizations in the third sector with a communitarian origin. Considering that the third sector organizations appear at informal contexts, the understanding of the factors that affect the process of strategy formation as well as the understanding of the influence of these factors on the challenges faced by the third sector are the central focus of this study. The proposed subject is based on data collected from two no-governmental organizations. The use of multiple cases has allowed a greater detailing and a possibility of matching results, increasing the contribution of the analysis performed individually. The results were described considering three different approaches of strategy formation: objectiveness, innovation and social environment and the challenges of the third sector: legitimacy, efficiency, sustainability, and cooperation. With the structure proposed by this study, it is possible to observe that the organizations studied, although informal, possess a process of strategy formation that can be framed within all the approaches mentioned here. The difference lays on how each one has dealt with the factors arisen from these approaches and how the strategies were related to the challenges by them faced. As major conclusions of the theory-practice relation, network cooperation and multiple leadership prevail. |