O papel do escravo em Aristóteles e Hegel

• Ano de defesa: 2009
• Autor(a) principal: Nicuia, Eurico Jorge
• Orientador(a): Weber, Thadeu
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul; Porto Alegre
• Palavras-chave em Português: FILOSOFIA; ESCRAVIDÃO (FILOSOFIA); DIALÉTICA; RECONHECIMENTO (FILOSOFIA); LIBERDADE; HEGEL, GEORG WILHELM FRIEDRICH - CRÍTICA E INTERPRETAÇÃO; ARISTÓTELES - CRÍTICA E INTERPRETAÇÃO
• Link de acesso: http://hdl.handle.net/10923/3472

This dissertation aims to analyze the rule of the slave in Aristotle and Hegel based on the historical-philosophical contexts of slavery on the first chapter. We also analyze the philosophical approach of slavery in Aristotle and Hegel on the second chapter. We finally lean over the rule of the slave in Aristotle and Hegel where the following is highlighted: -i) The household chore is the only rule described by Aristotle because the slavery had not ability to participate in an other city activities ii) logical-onthological or the interdependent relation between the two self-conscious, which search for self assurance upon the emergence of another conscience through the submission and work of the enslaved conscience constituting the forms of struggle for survival of both conscious. We, thus, approach too the social dimension of the human being through the alterity category, since it is inconceivable the existence of the Self without the Other; iii) ethical-political, following the recognition theory – a modern philosophical theory which relies on the intersubjectivity category to enable the formation of an individual conscience, a recognition of the subjects in the society and in the state and the achievement of freedom; iv) gnosiological, viewing the dialectic as a method and scientific system of the three moments of the knowledge evolution: thesis, antithesis and synthesis. According to Hegel, in order for knowledge to be true, absolute and scientific, it must go through an enunciation or affirmation of reality it intends to display (Thesis); following the critic or “negation' of affirmations made (antithesis) and, at last, the “development of a new affirmation, assuming important and permanent points of the original position, extending it” (Synthesis), similarly to the process in the master and slave dialectic.