Ocorrência de eventos adversos em hemodiálise sem e com a utilização de duas modalidades de sódio variável: estudo randomizado e com cross-over

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2009
Autor(a) principal: Meira, Fernanda Salazar
Orientador(a): D'Avila, Domingos Otávio Lorenzoni
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul
Porto Alegre
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: http://hdl.handle.net/10923/6735
Resumo: Introduction: The most frequent adverse events during dialysis are hypotension (20% to 30%) and muscle cramps (5% to 10%), and the most often prescribed treatment to these adverse events is the use of variable sodium (VNa) profiling. Objectives: The aim of the current study was to compare the frequency of adverse events during hemodialysis (HD), interdialytic weight gain, and blood pressure before and after dialysis, with and without the use of VNa, as well as with the use of two variable sodium models: stepwise (VNass) and linear (VNal).Methods: a randomized, cross-over, prospective study that enrolled 22 patients in two groups: one to receive VNas for 12 HD sessions, and the other VNal, for a similar period after 12 sessions without VNa. After a wash-out period of 12 sessions, groups were crossed over. The following parameters were analyzed: adverse events, interdialytic weight gain, and blood pressure (BP) before and after dialysis. Results: Mean age was 61. 2±15. 2 years; 11 (50%) patients were male. The occurrence of adverse events was significantly different between the period without VNa (48. 5%) and those with VNas and VNal (33. 7% and 36%; p<0. 001). There were no significant differences in BP or interdialytic weight gain among treatment modalities. Conclusion: The use of VNa was associated with a reduction in the number of adverse events. VNas resulted in less episodes of symptomatic hypotension; while VNal may be associated with reduced muscle cramps. VNa modeling is beneficial for selected patients, and should be individually prescribed.