Milagres constantes e inconstantes: variações no discurso jesuítico : 1610-1640
Ano de defesa: | 2005 |
---|---|
Autor(a) principal: | |
Orientador(a): | |
Banca de defesa: | |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
Idioma: | por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul
Porto Alegre |
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Palavras-chave em Português: | |
Link de acesso: | http://hdl.handle.net/10923/3767 |
Resumo: | The analysis discussed in this paper proposes the reconsideration about the study of the miracle appealed into the Jesuitical documentation, privileging the pronounced elements in the religious speech which followed and culminate inside the phenomenon. The miracles were selected from De Angelis Collection, between the period of 1610 to 1640. It should be presented the huge quantity of the miracles registration in Jesuitical letters, aiming the phenomenon as one at the peak of Jesuitical religious experiments. It seems that, being clear construction of a model as well as the necessary missionary filter,that a miracle account should cover: first, to emphasize the degree of kindness / demoniac action (or to set an example of Christianity models), soon afterward to present a conclusion — the interpretation lead by Jesuit reporter / filter / spreader. When this is presented in the condition of letter author as well as the reporter character of the phenomenon, the miracle is evidenced as an ideal model, characterized as the example cases. Grasping the attention about these modal elements, we realize that when the Jesuit stops being an active character of the phenomenon, the account elements change themselves. The judgment about the heavenly validity, compared to the miracle, it should be given by the missioner as well as we could classify it as demoniac action. |