O duplo grau de jurisdição e a efetividade do processo
Ano de defesa: | 2008 |
---|---|
Autor(a) principal: | |
Orientador(a): | |
Banca de defesa: | |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Tipo de acesso: | Acesso aberto |
Idioma: | por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul
Porto Alegre |
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Palavras-chave em Português: | |
Link de acesso: | http://hdl.handle.net/10923/2519 |
Resumo: | This research aims to debate the institute of superior jurisdiction in the sense to establish how it is being understood and manipulated, in the civil process, before the appeal reforms that aim the materialization of an effective procedural system. To do so, it will be developed a research considering the institute itself, comparing the benefits and damages that come from its observance, and defining a comprehension of it, that can be able to harmonize with the desired procedural effectiveness. Using the systematic interpretation, it will be demonstrated, through a set of rules, that the superior jurisdiction is consolidated in a directive resulting from the constitutional thought, resulting from this one the necessity of compliance with that one. Such a respect, however, does not stop the superior jurisdiction, once part of the procedural system, to be understood as an instrument of effectiveness, even when diminished, except when it is eliminated from the system. In the end, it will be verified, through punctual analyses related to reforms in the appealing area, if the spirit of these combines with a superior jurisdiction able to confer procedural effectiveness. |