Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2021 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Calasans, Georgia Aparecida Santos de Araújo
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Dal Corso, Simone |
| Banca de defesa: |
Dal Corso, Simone,
Gomes, Evelim Leal de Freitas Dantas,
Lanza, Fernanda de Cordoba |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Nove de Julho
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Reabilitação
|
| Departamento: |
Saúde
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
http://bibliotecatede.uninove.br/handle/tede/2564
|
Resumo: |
In times of the COVID-19 pandemic, it would be useful to assess the functional capacity of fibrocystics children and adolescents in their own homes by clinical field tests.Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of conducting functional capacity tests by telemonitoring in fibrocystics children and adolescents. Methods: Fibrocystic children and adolescents underwent: 3-minute step test (TD3), 1-minute sit-to-stand test (TSL-1min) and timed up and go test (TUG) in two randomized visits, both at the patient's home, supervised directly (face-to-face) and indirectly (telemonitoring). The number of steps in the TD3, the number of repetitions in the TSL-1min, the time taken to perform the TUG and its physiological variables were compared between supervisions. The feasibility assessment included: interaction with the evaluator, quality of sound and video instruction, experience of the participant, best method according to the participant and safety of the method. Results: 32 children and adolescents were recruited (15 boys, 11 ± 3 years, FEV1 73 ± 17% of predicted). The performances between face-to-face and telemonitoring were similar in TD3 [88 (79-90) and 88 (63-90) number of steps, respectively], in TSL-1min [35 (19-51) and 33 (17- 55) repetitions, respectively] and TUG [6 (4-11) and 6 (4-12) seconds, respectively]. Participants reported good interaction with the evaluator [5 (3-5)], video and sound quality [5 (3-5) and 4 (1-5)], respectively) and experience [5 (3-5)]. Safety was classified as low risk for 56% of the sample. Conclusion: The TD3, TSL-1min and TUG tests were feasible and safe to be performed by telemonitoring. |
