Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2017 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Alves, Rosilda Maria
 |
| Orientador(a): |
Lorieri, Marcos Antonio |
| Banca de defesa: |
Lorieri, Marcos Antonio,
Roggero, Rosemary,
Haas, C??lia Maria,
Camargo, Rubens Barbosa de,
Carvalho, Celso do Prado Ferraz de |
| Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Nove de Julho
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de P??s-Gradua????o em Educa????o
|
| Departamento: |
Educa????o
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
http://bibliotecatede.uninove.br/handle/tede/1739
|
Resumo: |
The main purpose of this research is to address an issue that is little discussed in the professional education system, which is the management model that emerges from the practices of general directors, especially those that make up the Federal Institute of Education, Science and Tecnologia do Piau?? (IFPI), with the general objective of analyzing the profiles and management practices of the IFPI directors, starting from the managerial and democratic assumptions. The school administration has been the subject of debates and discussions by several authors in the contemporary world and is currently the focus of discussions for the improvement of education in the country. The research problem is: Which of the two management models (managerial or democratic) do the management practices of IFPI camp directors identify? For the development of this study, we sought theoretical basis in the studies of several authors, among them: Saviani (2007); Frigotto; Ciavatta and Ramos (2005, 2006), Kuenzer (2000, 2007); Cunha (2000, 2002); Caires and Oliveira (2016); Vieira (2007, 2009); Cabral Neto and Castro (2011); Paro (1995, 1996, 2003). The research used the qualitative methodological approach in the policy cycle approach, with field research, based on a case study, as a research strategy based on its adequacy to the research objectives. The methodological techniques used were the interview, questionnaire, discussion group and documentary analysis, using as a source of analysis the documents generated by the Ministry of Education (MEC) and the IFPI. The focus of the research was set in the context of practice, where policies are constantly reinterpreted. Based on the field research, it was verified that the directors of the IFPI have a managerial practice more focused on the managerial management. It is noteworthy that the model of democratic management is only found in some institutional documents. The results of this research reveal, therefore, that the managerial model is highlighted in IFPI because there are specific forms of regulation of professional education, expressed through management contracts, Management Reports, Institutional Development Plan and even the performance of external control bodies. Even though these documents present more emphasis on managerial management, the general directors, in their speeches, reinforce that they use democratic management, but in the context of practice, managerial management is evident in the actions of directors, as they seek to achieve the results expected by the MEC and rector of the IFPI. It is hoped, therefore, that this research may contribute to the improvement of the quality of professional education, taking as a reference the actions of managers, as a constant search for changes that may take place within the institution studied. |
