Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2015 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Amaral, Augusto Carlos Patti do
 |
Orientador(a): |
Nelson, Reed Elliot
 |
Banca de defesa: |
Barbosa, Antonio Pires,
Assis, Sonia Francisca Monken de,
Malik, Ana Maria,
Amorim, Maria Cristina Sanches |
Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Nove de Julho
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de P??s-Gradua????o em Administra????o
|
Departamento: |
Administra????o
|
País: |
Brasil
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
https://bibliotecatede.uninove.br/handle/tede/1017
|
Resumo: |
The management of health care in general and hospitals in particular, is especially difficult in modern societies due to conflicts between conflicting values that resonate in these contexts (Goss, 1963; Stevenson, 2000). It is believed that these difficulties are expressed and resolved (if they are resolved in some way) in the culture or subculture of organizations that provide health care (Scott, Mannion, Davies & Marshall, 2003). Despite the intuitive relationship between national and organizational culture, empirical research linking the two phenomena are scarce. This paper compares the national and organizational cultures of Brazil and the United States and finds a significant, but complex. Clusters are found in the two countries that both replicate systematically reject as national values. In this paper uses an approach for the diagnosis of organizational culture in hospitals that explicitly deal with the conflicts between human relations, managerial effectiveness and technical capacity to learn as 9 hospitals - 4 in the US and 5 in Brazil - deal with the provision of health services. It appears that the verbal networks of such organizations form a center-periphery configuration instead of a hierarchical configuration. It is noted that there seems to be more variation in organizational cultures between hospitals within the studied than among countries own countries. |