Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2019 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Carraro, Renata |
| Orientador(a): |
Passos, Mateus Yuri |
| Banca de defesa: |
Azevedo , Adriana Barroso de,
Silva , Cilene Victor da,
Medina , Cremilda de Araújo,
Antonioli , Maria Elizabete |
| Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Metodista de Sao Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Comunicacao Social
|
| Departamento: |
Comunicacao Social:Programa de Pos Graduacao em Comunicacao Social
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
http://tede.metodista.br/jspui/handle/tede/1855
|
Resumo: |
A study of journalistic profile in the wide and diverse scope of narrative in general and journalistic narrative in particular is presented here. The subject is examined in the last part of this dissertation in a practical, pedagogical and also empirical manner, since that stage of the journey describes, analyses and interprets a set of characteristics, meanings, possibilities and also limits of an experience of profile writing developed with undergrad students in the third year of a Journalism program. Forty are the authors – still in training at the time the texts were written – of the profiles which until now have been published in three anthologies – the main corpus in our analysis. The project, as presented here, teaches and trains as much through the students’ efforts in order to deliver the frequent assignments proposed in the Teaching Plan of the “Literary Journalism and Longform Reporting” as through the fact that such efforts are associated with being close to people for whom journalism was the most important profesional activity of their lives. The organization of this dissertation in the form of a journey in four stages and fifteen stations must be seen in the context of an option for showing, seeing an interpreting, more than demonstrating – in sum, we prefer the uncertainty of (dialogical) comprehension and understanding to the illusory certainty of an (authoritarian) explanation. Or rather: in a methodological sense, comprehension and explanation are able to converse and sometimes excitedly do so in a text akin in nature to the essay. Such a dialogue is a serious one, albeit not letting itself submit to be hanged by the method, and sees in the principles of analysis it constructs and in the writing techniques evoked by the journalistic profile an invitation to the comprehension of a “profile of the journalistic profile”, the proposition of a (pertinent) notion instead of a (closed) concept. The work is transpassed from beginning to end by the idea/strength that all narratives put us in the field of knowledge construction regarding life, world, people, history. Thus, we have to narrate: narrative in its own way institutes us as human beings. The not always easy and never certain and safe search for conversing with principles, techniques and theories happily leaves the domains of abstraction in order to establish a dialogue with scholars, researchers and in particular profile writers. Standing directly under the light of the sign of relation (Cremilda Medina), this approach to journalism writing moves in the vicinity of political and social phenomena as well as of the human soul itself. The proposal of profile as a genre is thus, for that very reason, a bet on the cultivation of bonds and relations in this world which at times becomes as much fascinated as crazed by the marvelous technical posibilities for connection |
