Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2014 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Moreira, Cosme Alexandre Ribeiro |
Orientador(a): |
Souza, Sandra Duarte de
 |
Banca de defesa: |
Lemos, Carolina Teles
,
Lopes, Nicanor |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Metodista de São Paulo
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
PÓS GRADUAÇÃO EM CIÊNCIAS DA RELIGIÃO
|
Departamento: |
1. Ciências Sociais e Religião 2. Literatura e Religião no Mundo Bíblico 3. Práxis Religiosa e Socie
|
País: |
BR
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
http://tede.metodista.br/jspui/handle/tede/291
|
Resumo: |
The religions, especially the monotheists ones jewish, islamic and christian, always condemned the homosexuals stating that homosexuality is a behavior contrary to the religious and biologicals determinations which God stipulated to the human race. In this context, the present work will analyze which is the treatment given by some christian leaders and evangelical parliamentarians about the LGBT claims, between the years 2010 and 2013. The dissertation is divided in three chapters. The first chapter will explain about the origins, definitions, approaches and the detachments existing between the concepts of secularism and secularization, which will serve as a background to analyze the private religious presence in the political public space. The second chapter will historically analyze the treatment given by the christian religion to the homosexuals, with a brief history about the ascension of the christian religion and its hegemony as the official religion of the Roman Empire. Still in the second chapter, the question of the homosexuality and its treatment by the christian religion, since the epoch of the portuguese colonization until these days, with an analysis about the utilization of the mass medias In the third chapter the dissertation will deepen the theme with an analysis of the speech of the evangelicals parliamentarians about the LGBT claims. In this context, it ll be demonstrate how the speeches are directed to specific points of the claims of the homosexual population, to prevent its pretensions in the National Congress. Still will be analyzed how the evangelicals parliamentarians recede on their doctrinal arguments (religious) and, start to utilize political arguments, juridical arguments and social arguments, focusing to strengthen their speeches and weaken the arguments of the LGBT activists in the pursuit of their claims. |