LIDERANÇA A DISTÂNCIA: UM ESTUDO SOBRE OS DESAFIOS DE LIDERAR EQUIPES EM UM CONTEXTO DE TRABALHO REMOTO

• Ano de defesa: 2016
• Autor(a) principal: BUCATER, APARECIDA
• Orientador(a): Kuniyoshi, Marcio Shioti
• Banca de defesa: Costa, Luciano Venelli, Veloso, Elza Fátima Rosa
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
• Idioma: por
• Instituição de defesa: Universidade Metodista de Sao Paulo
• Programa de Pós-Graduação: Administracao
• Departamento: Administracao::Programa de Pos Graduacao em Administracao
• País: Brasil
• Palavras-chave em Português: trabalho remoto; e-Líder; e-Liderança; competências; teleworking; e- Leader; e-Leadership; skills
• Área do conhecimento CNPq: CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::ADMINISTRACAO
• Link de acesso: http://tede.metodista.br/jspui/handle/tede/1580

This study aimed to identify the factors that interfere in the e-Leadership process and to identify the challenges and skills demanded of e-Leader. Therefore the option was for a qualitative study and research was exploratory in nature. The tool used was the interview with the support of semi structured script. We interviewed six professionals with expertise in classroom leadership, working with remote teams in medium and large companies from various sectors. Data from the interviews were grouped, categorized and analyzed to facilitate the reading and understanding of the study. The research findings corroborate studies on the remote work environment that involves time, space and technology and is characterized by flexibility. They identified four factors that interfere as facilitators of e-Leader action: the technology, the team´s characteristics, infrastructure organizations offer and virtual meetings, the latter with an approach one differentiated both in relation to researchers considered for this study. The main challenges were identified control, team motivation and adaptation to the new model corroborating the studies considered for this job. Regarding skills were identified fiveteen that corroborated the studies on the subject, five appointed by the researchers and not cited by respondents and seven presented by the interviewees and were not found in the studies considered for this work.