Detalhes bibliográficos
| Ano de defesa: |
2022 |
| Autor(a) principal: |
Freitas, Renato Pereira |
| Orientador(a): |
Kaefer, José Ademar |
| Banca de defesa: |
Francisco, Edson de Faria,
Porto, Vagner Carvalheiro |
| Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
| Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
| Idioma: |
por |
| Instituição de defesa: |
Universidade Metodista de Sao Paulo
|
| Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Ciencias da Religiao
|
| Departamento: |
Ciencias da Religiao:Programa de Pos Graduacao em Ciencias da Religiao
|
| País: |
Brasil
|
| Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
| Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
| Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
| Link de acesso: |
http://tede.metodista.br/jspui/handle/tede/2263
|
Resumo: |
The main objective of this work is to investigate the problem of socio-religious relations, existing in the Persian period, between Jews and Samaritans, from a multidisciplinary approach. Initially, an exegetical study of the text of Ezra 4.6-16 was carried out, which describes moments of an alleged embargo of the Samaritans present the reconstruction of the city of Jerusalem. However, in the investigation carried out in this work, it was verified that this text has a great complexity in its construction with chronological jumps and repeated introductions, which casts doubts on the authenticity of the letters that appear in Ezra. To delve into whether there were reasons for this conflict between Judaites and Samaritans, a study was carried out based on coins that circulated in Samaria and Judah in the Persian period. This approach was carried out because the iconography and the inscriptions, which appear on the coins have a lot of information, which refer to the economic, political, social and religious context of the provinces, thus allowing to launch hypotheses about the interactions between these two peoples. From the exegetical analysis and the coins it was possible to raise two hypotheses about this supposed conflict described in Ezra 4.6-16. The first hypothesis is that this conflict would be internal between the inhabitants, who remained in Judah, and the repatriates, who returned from Babylon. The second hypothesis is that if this conflict existed, it probably occurred in the Hellenistic period, when there was great changes in the monetary system of Judah. In addition, the exegetical analysis of Ezra 4.6-16 points out that the letter has a writing style aligned with texts produced in the Hellenistic period.(AU) |
