Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2023 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Melo, Thiago Augusto Schmidt de
 |
Orientador(a): |
Oliveira, Kamila Pagel
 |
Banca de defesa: |
Oliveira, Kamila Pagel,
Cruz, Marcus Vinicius Gonçalves da,
Carvalho, Flaviana Andrade de Pádua,
Bergue, Sandro Trescastro |
Tipo de documento: |
Dissertação
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Fundação João Pinheiro
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Programa de Mestrado em Administração Pública
|
Departamento: |
Escola de Governo Paulo Neves de Carvalho
|
País: |
Brasil
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Área do conhecimento CNPq: |
|
Link de acesso: |
http://repositorio.fjp.mg.gov.br/handle/123456789/3922
|
Resumo: |
This research aims to analyze people management in the public sector, with a focus on the institute of stability and on the special evaluation of performance within the scope of two municipalities in Minas Gerais. The objective of the research is to analyze the process of special performance evaluation of public servants during the probationary period, from the perspective of giving them the stability provided by law. It begins by analyzing the stability and the challenge of evaluating public servants. Afterward, some considerations are made about the most recent political debates on the subject, bringing up general concepts, the historical origin of stability, and its provision in the Federal Constitution. Soon after, it enters into the legal instruments provided for in the Federal Constitution that allow and direct the evaluation of public servants, with a greater focus on the special performance evaluation. This is still worked on in the light of performance management in the public sphere, presenting some notes made by the literature on the act of evaluating the public servant. The methodology is based on a case study, giving a more empirical approach to the research, studying the special performance evaluation in two municipalities in Minas Gerais – Campo Belo and Belo Horizonte. The municipal norms of both, which regulate the evaluation during the probationary period, are analyzed, describing in a comparative way how the performance evaluation takes place in each city hall. Nine civil servants were interviewed in each location, highlighting the positive and negative points presented by the interviewees during the evaluation process. Some distinctions were found in the evaluation processes in each location, despite the similarities among the complaints and speeches of the interviewees, regarding their impressions of the special performance evaluation. It concludes by stating that the institute of stability, by itself, does not create obstacles to the proper functioning of the public service, but rather an absence or deficiency in people management, reified, in this work, by the lack of a more specific, concrete and reliable performance evaluation. |