A função do processo coletivo na judicialização da saúde: um estudo de caso sobre o Estado de Minas Gerais

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2017
Autor(a) principal: Melo, Luíza Viana lattes
Orientador(a): Pinto, Luciana Moraes Raso Sardinha lattes
Banca de defesa: Haikal, Daniela Mello Coelho lattes, Dias, Maria Tereza Fonseca lattes
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Fundação João Pinheiro
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Programa de Mestrado em Administração Pública
Departamento: Escola de Governo Professor Paulo Neves de Carvalho
País: Brasil
Palavras-chave em Português:
Área do conhecimento CNPq:
Link de acesso: http://repositorio.fjp.mg.gov.br/handle/tede/408
Resumo: Twenty-nine years after the promulgation of the Constitution of the Republic of 1988, it is necessary to rethink many institutes and innovations brought or improved by the Major Law, especially regarding the syndicability of the fundamental right to health and the suitable guardianship to protect and to realize this right, in view of the current scenario of indiscriminate health judicialization. In this sense, the present study considers that the inadequate management of collective guardianship in the scope of health judicialization, in which the Prosecutor's Office favors a health approach based on its individual bias, associated with standardized decisions that do not promote a compatible procedural instruction with the complexity of lawsuits, are factors that end up aggravating a framework of inequalities in access to this right. Therefore, the collective health dimension and the SUS (Unified Health System) have been deprecated in the current judicialization of health, despite the experience of a paradigm of Constitutional State of Law, marked by the publicity of Law and by the force of fundamental social and collective rights.