| Resumo: |
This work aimed to understand how the military's organizational culture influences the management model of the institution. The daily institutional military police is full of situations that serve as the subject of oral arguments on the process of identity construction of the military police as a result of normative behavior and discipline consolidating historically rooted concepts, which are pass on from generation to generation. The military police's manner set up an institutional culture that enhances the security crisis installed in society. Faced with this reality, institutional management becomes an important subject of investigation capable to add with changes in military police work, because there is still the modus operand's public safety an action typically connected to the control of violence through the use of violence. Presumably, this role would be exercised by complying with the doctrine that is currently taught in military academies. However, these formulations are used as a shield and reinforcement of rigid military values, setting the organizational culture of the institution, so that these precepts and practices that accompany them are the main references of theoretical discourse and the ideological arguments of the Military Police. The results showe the doctrinal basis, transplanted from the Brazilian army and led to military police, persist until the present day at that institution and resulted in the absorption of military doctrine expressed in thought, symbols, structure and modus operand's, what keeps it under tight control, given the expectations of the state and particularly not the people or the police itself. The military's organizational culture remains almost unchanged since its origins, which places in dissonance with the contemporary realities, the management model that the military police uses was constructed from the ideological basis of their origins, focusing on hierarchy and discipline, and it has in compliance with the regulation the central focus of management and the model of governance practiced by the military prevents the fulfillment of its institutional and social beca use its focus is gone, ie, rather than focusing on solving the problems of security and rights of the company aims to fulfill linear, pure and sim pie regulation of the military. The conclusion is the organizational culture of the military police determines the model of contemporary management of the institution focused on militarization. It is a model that focuses on hierarchy and discipline (and attachment to the Regulation) at the expense of intellectual capital and the participation of its members and society in the identification and solution of their goals and objectives. As a result, the military distanced itself from their institutional and social solutions, which led the society to resent itself of protection and defense of their rights. |
|---|
