Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2017 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Fernandes, June Marques |
Orientador(a): |
Di Serio, Luiz Carlos |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Palavras-chave em Inglês: |
|
Link de acesso: |
https://hdl.handle.net/10438/19662
|
Resumo: |
Universities and research centers began to play the role of capitalizing knowledge, fostering wealth generation and social development, characterizing themselves as entrepreneurial universities. However, to promote technological innovation in the academic environment, it is important to structure a Technological Business Planning Process (TBPP), whose composition is based on three pillars: (i) Technological Planning Process (TPP), that seeks to aid the incorporation of technology, (ii) the Technology Transfer Planning Process (TTPP), consisting of a structuring of all the phases that make up the process of transferring technology from universities to the market, and (iii) the Business Planning Process (BPP), that corresponds to the phases of business development. Together, these three processes comprise the Technological Business Planning Process (TBPP). The structuring of the processes of these businesses is immersed in several situations involving losses and wastes (for example: excessive waiting time, delay and rework during the development process, among others). This aspect leads us to a reflection on the need to adopt methods and tools (we will call this research as practices), guided by lean principles, especially for Lean Product Development (LPD) and Lean Startup Methodology (LSM). In order to respond to the proposed research problem, namely: “How do LPD and LSM practices contribute to PPNT in the academic environment?”, two general research objectives were defined: a) identify a set of LPD practices that contribute to the operation of the PPTec; b) to evaluate the contributions of LSM practices to the TPP, BPP and TTPP phases. In order to proceed with the research, this thesis was organized into four chapters with objectives and different methodological strategies: i) in chapter 1 using the methodological action research strategy was aimed at characterizing the business model of each technological project analyzed; ii) in chapter 2, through the multi-case study, the frequency with which the entrepreneur-researchers had experienced the waste categories and subcategories during the development of the three processes that integrate the TBPP, using the perspective of the LPD; iii) in chapter 3, based on the literature review, it was possible to identify LPD-related practices that can contribute to the reduction of waste experienced by project teams in different phases of the TPP process; iv) chapter 4, through literature review and later action research, had the objective of identifying the LSM practices that could contribute to mitigate the waste experienced by project teams in the different phases of TTPP and BPP. As a result of the research we have: 1) improvement and empirical validation of the model proposed by Reis, Ladeira and Fernandes (2015); 2) contribution to the theoretical framework on LPD, since it was possible to identify LPD practices capable of contributing to the operation of the TPP in its different phases; 3) contribution to the theoretical framework on LSM, since the LSM practices were able to contribute to the operationalization of TTPP and BPP, from a theoretical perspective. As a limitation of the research, we have not been confronted with the practices and wastes in the stage of ideation of the technology, in order to identify the contributions of the same to the initial stages of the business. In part this limitation was related to the specificities of the analyzed projects, since all had a version of its technological product. Another limitation is that the research was applied in only 9 technology-based projects in the academic environment. From this aspect it is important to expand the studies for spinoffs of corporate contexts or belonging to other programs and initiatives to encourage innovation. For the time being, this research was able to contribute to the enrichment and expansion of the literature on LPD, LSM and TBPP, as well as to present mechanisms to aid the process of technological innovation in the academic environment, and to have guided the development of the cases studied. |