Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2017 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Andrade, Daniel Modenesi de |
Orientador(a): |
Behr, Patrick Gottfried |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
eng |
Instituição de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Link de acesso: |
http://hdl.handle.net/10438/19199
|
Resumo: |
This dissertation reports empirical evidence on the impact of planning and monitoring (feedback) on performance/deviation, failure to achieve the goal, and overconfidence. One hundred and eighty-six proprietary day traders participated in an experiment, where they were exposed to interventions before starting trading. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of four groups: planning, feedback, a combination of both interventions, and a control group. The treatment phase lasted one week, constituting a mixed design. The main findings are: a) only the monitoring process can be used as a self-control mechanism oriented to goal achievement, But in situations where traders keep tracking their performances without associate it to a goal, they are sensitive to unfavorable outcomes; b) planning the gain target for the day was not a successful strategy neither toward goal achievement nor to performance; c) traders who use the past day return as a forecasting source became more overconfident in reaching the weekly income. |