Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: |
2016 |
Autor(a) principal: |
Zilio, Katia Cristina Schuhmann |
Orientador(a): |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Banca de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição |
Tipo de documento: |
Tese
|
Tipo de acesso: |
Acesso aberto |
Idioma: |
por |
Instituição de defesa: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Programa de Pós-Graduação: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Departamento: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
País: |
Não Informado pela instituição
|
Palavras-chave em Português: |
|
Link de acesso: |
https://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/3331
|
Resumo: |
Understanding the registration process of the student as subject in an online discourse, and particularly in the textuality of Google search engine putsthe authorship in question, what we will do in the light of discourse analysis. To search and to reflect how the search works, how is the flow of information, and how it is transformed into knowledge, it is important for a society that increasingly receives information. Our focus is on the fifth year classesof two public schools, later to propose a practice that can make the reflected and qualified search / research at schools. Here we analyze the authorship production conditions when establishing the search for a theme (school research practice). The ultimate goal that is worth this research is to qualify this practice. The schools involved in this experience are part of the Scholarship Institutional Program for Beginner Teachers (PIBID) and were selected because they have lower IDEB - Basic Education Development Index -in the municipality. Data collection was performed by academic people from pedagogy course which developed teaching experience in two elementary schools in three classes of fifth grades, with a project "Teacher training: technology and interdisciplinary. " We work with the composition of the corpus in the trial mode through files made during the search. In this way were also filmed the search approaches / research students, as on the internet, as with written materials (books, magazines, etc. ). The material filmed concerning the search / google search was analyzed based on the theoretical device of discourse analysis. The results point to the fact that the paths chosen by the students reveal their ignorance of the research process in digital textuality. Researching in written material, the student seemed to be more at ease, being such as an everyday activity of the school. As we reflect on the authorship, we realize the mobilization of author-function in the search process / search of fifth graders and academic people on scholarship, but this function tend to erasure by paraphrases imposed by the Pedagogic Discourse. Although, it is important to say that the Pedagogic Discourse, although predominantly authoritarian, it is not completely; more controversial, more effective authorship. Establishing controversial formsin order to mobilize the function-author is not easy at school, but it is a necessary task for the textualization process. In the present case, beginning with the notion of Gallo (2008) practice textualization, we get to the proposition called digital textualization practice. |