Avaliação da bibliografia dos cursos de graduação de uma instituição federal de ensino: proposta de um modelo multicritério

Detalhes bibliográficos
Ano de defesa: 2021
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Patrícia da
Orientador(a): Não Informado pela instituição
Banca de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Tipo de acesso: Acesso aberto
Idioma: por
Instituição de defesa: Não Informado pela instituição
Programa de Pós-Graduação: Não Informado pela instituição
Departamento: Não Informado pela instituição
País: Não Informado pela instituição
Palavras-chave em Português:
Link de acesso: https://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/15104
Resumo: The bibliographic references contained in the Pedagogical Projects of Higher Education Courses permeate different processes within Higher Education Institutions (administrative, financial, educational), being of significant importance in the teaching-learning process in the Curricular Units of the courses, deserving attention in their elaboration. and commitment, in order to fulfill their purpose within the training of students. The objective of this research is to structure a model for evaluating the bibliographies of undergraduate courses at the Federal Institute of Santa Catarina (IFSC), Campus Florianópolis-Continente (CTE), based on the Multicriteria Methodology for Decision Support - Constructivist (MCDA-C). This is an exploratory research, with a qualitative approach, in the form of a case study, using the collection of primary data (semi-structured interview) collected in the Structuring Phase of the MCDA-C Methodology, and secondary (bibliographic research), collected through the instrument for mapping and analyzing the scientific literature Knowledge Development Process-Constructivist (ProKnow-C). The results achieved demonstrate in the complete model: (i) the identification of 5 Points of Fundamental Views (Regulatory Evaluation, Student Performance, Curricular Alignment, Bibliographic Quality, and Financial Resource); (ii) the construction of 57 descriptors; (iii) the disclosure of the performance profile of the 57 descriptors (status quo), being 04 with compromising performance, 07 with market performance and 31 with excellence performance. Through the built model, it was possible to perceive the performance of each descriptor in the scales ordinarily measured for each one of them, enabling the proposition of improvement actions.