Cost-effectiveness of mandatory folic acid fortification of flours in prevention of neural tube defects : a systematic review
Guardat en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Data de publicació: | 2021 |
| Altres autors: | , |
| Format: | Article |
| Idioma: | eng |
| Font: | Repositório Institucional da UnB |
| Download full: | https://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/43417 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258488 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2389-820X |
Sumari: | Background Neural tube defects (NTDs) constitute the most frequent group among congenital malformations and are the main cause of neonatal morbimortality. Folic acid (FA) can reduce the risk of pregnancies affected by NTDs. Objective We aimed to investigate whether mandatory folic acid (FA) fortification of flours is cost-effective as compared to non-mandatory fortification, and to verify whether FA dosage, cost composition, and the quality of economic studies influence the cost-effectiveness of outcomes. Methods We conducted a systematic review. The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD 42018115682). A search was conducted using the electronic databases MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and EBSCO/CINAHL between January 2019 and October 2020 and updated in February 2021. Eligible studies comprised original economic analyses of mandatory FA fortification of wheat and corn flours (maize flours) compared to strategies of non-mandatory fortification in flours and/or use of FA supplements for NTD prevention. The Drummond verification list was used for quality analysis. Results A total of 7,859 studies were identified, of which 13 were selected. Most (77%; n = 10) studies originated from high-income countries, while three (23%) were from upper-middle-income countries. Results of a cost-effectiveness analysis showed that fortification is cost-effective for NTD prevention, except for in one study in New Zealand. The cost-benefit analysis yielded a median ratio of 17.5:1 (0.98:1 to 417.1:1), meaning that for each monetary unit spent in the program, there would be a return of 17.5 monetary units. Even in the most unfavorable case of mandatory fortification, the investment in the program would virtually payoff at a ratio of 1:0.98. All FA dosages were cost-effective and offered positive health gains, except in one study. The outcomes of two studies showed that FA dosages above 300 μg/100 g have a higher CBA ratio. The studies with the inclusion of “loss of consumer choice” in the analysis may alter the fortification cost-efficacy ratio. Conclusion We expect the findings to be useful for public agencies in different countries in decision-making on the implementation and/or continuity of FA fortification as a public policy in NTD prevention. |
Ítems similars: Cost-effectiveness of mandatory folic acid fortification of flours in prevention of neural tube defects : a systematic review
- Prevented cases of neural tube defects and cost savings after folic acid fortification of flour in Brazil
- Estudo da prevalência de defeitos de tubo neural no Brasil e do padrão de consumo de ácido fólico em gestantes do vale do Jequitinhonha, Brasil
- “Carga econômica dos defeitos do tubo neural na perspectiva do Ministério da Saúde no período de 2010-2019.”
- Efeito da fortificação com ácido fólico na redução dos defeitos do tubo neural
- Análise do processo de implementação da estratégia de fortificação obrigatória das farinhas de trigo e de milho com ferro e ácido fólico no Brasil
- Consumo alimentar em gestantes e os possíveis efeitos da fortificação obrigatória de farinhas com ácido fólico na ocorrência de defeitos de tubo neural no Distrito Federal