Comparação entre os sistemas construtivos de alvenaria estrutural e paredes de concreto monolíticas moldadas in loco

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lara, Bruna Stocco de
Publication Date: 2016
Other Authors: Pilonetto, Camila Vandresen
Format: Bachelor thesis
Language: por
Source: Repositório Institucional da UTFPR (da Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (RIUT))
Download full: http://repositorio.utfpr.edu.br/jspui/handle/1/8080
Summary: New technologies in building systems are becoming more popular in the national market. In 2009, in order to meet the housing deficit generated by the unplanned development in Brazil, the federal government created the program Minha Casa Minha Vida, which resulted in a serie of changes in the way of how popular buildings in the country way are made. After setting up the program arose the need to have greater control over the new works, thus giving upgrade to PBQP-H (Brazilian Program of Habitat Quality and Productivity) which in turn led builders to seek unconventional building systems. This study deals with just two of these systems, structural masonry and walls of monolithic concrete molded on site, comparing them as the cost and time. The need for this analysis is based on the difficulties currently faced by national construction companies to obtain interesting financial results in a little hot market and with small profit margins, thus a constructive system presenting waste and term lower performance, is of extreme interest. In order to assist in the most advantageous construction system selection will be presented comparative data, including a budget of a model block for each system and their schedules as well as further analysis of variance overhead, reaching a parameter spreadsheet that allows to choose the better construction system for a given number of blocks of apartments. The compilation of these data arrives at a parameterization sheet, which allows choosing the best construction system for a given number of blocks of apartments. These allow to conclude that the construction system of structural masonry is more advantageous to perform up to 3 blocks of apartments and amounts above, within the simulation would be more interesting to select the structural system of concrete monolithic walls molded on site.
id UTFPR-12_4509db23b2d0c6aac5358e1a23b0cea0
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.utfpr.edu.br:1/8080
network_acronym_str UTFPR-12
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UTFPR (da Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (RIUT))
repository_id_str
spelling Comparação entre os sistemas construtivos de alvenaria estrutural e paredes de concreto monolíticas moldadas in locoComparison between building systems structural masonry and walls of monolithic concrete molded on siteAlvenariaParedesConcretoCustoMasonryAnálise estrutural (Engenharia)Engenharia civilWallsConcreteCostStructural analysis (Engineering)Civil engineeringCNPQ::ENGENHARIAS::ENGENHARIA CIVIL::CONSTRUCAO CIVIL::PROCESSOS CONSTRUTIVOSNew technologies in building systems are becoming more popular in the national market. In 2009, in order to meet the housing deficit generated by the unplanned development in Brazil, the federal government created the program Minha Casa Minha Vida, which resulted in a serie of changes in the way of how popular buildings in the country way are made. After setting up the program arose the need to have greater control over the new works, thus giving upgrade to PBQP-H (Brazilian Program of Habitat Quality and Productivity) which in turn led builders to seek unconventional building systems. This study deals with just two of these systems, structural masonry and walls of monolithic concrete molded on site, comparing them as the cost and time. The need for this analysis is based on the difficulties currently faced by national construction companies to obtain interesting financial results in a little hot market and with small profit margins, thus a constructive system presenting waste and term lower performance, is of extreme interest. In order to assist in the most advantageous construction system selection will be presented comparative data, including a budget of a model block for each system and their schedules as well as further analysis of variance overhead, reaching a parameter spreadsheet that allows to choose the better construction system for a given number of blocks of apartments. The compilation of these data arrives at a parameterization sheet, which allows choosing the best construction system for a given number of blocks of apartments. These allow to conclude that the construction system of structural masonry is more advantageous to perform up to 3 blocks of apartments and amounts above, within the simulation would be more interesting to select the structural system of concrete monolithic walls molded on site.Novas tecnologias em sistemas construtivos vêm ganhando espaço no mercado nacional. No ano de 2009, visando suprir o déficit habitacional gerado pelo grande desenvolvimento pouco planejado do Brasil, o governo federal criou o Programa Minha Casa Minha Vida, que acarretou em uma série de mudanças no modo de se realizar construções populares no país. Após a criação do programa surgiu a necessidade de se ter maior controle sobre as novas obras, dando mais força assim ao PBQP-H (Programa Brasileiro de Qualidade e Produtividade do Habitat) que por sua vez levou as construtoras a buscarem sistemas não convencionais de construção. O presente trabalho versa especialmente sobre dois destes sistemas, a alvenaria estrutural e as paredes de concreto monolíticas moldadas in loco, comparando-os quanto a custo e prazo. A necessidade desta análise baseia-se na dificuldade enfrentada atualmente pelas construtoras nacionais em obter resultados financeiros interessantes em um mercado pouco aquecido e com margens de lucro pequenas. Sendo assim, um sistema construtivo que apresente menores desperdícios e prazos de execução, é de extremo interesse. A fim de auxiliar na seleção do sistema construtivo mais vantajoso são apresentados dados comparativos, incluindo orçamentos de um bloco de apartamentos habitacionais modelo para cada sistema e seus cronogramas, além de análises complementares de variação de custos indiretos. A compilação destes dados chega a uma planilha de parametrização, que permite a escolha do melhor sistema construtivo para um determinado número de blocos de apartamentos habitacionais, permitindo concluirse que o sistema construtivo de alvenaria estrutural é mais vantajoso para a execução de até 3 blocos de apartamentos e para quantidades superiores, dentro da simulação realizada seria mais interessante selecionar o sistema construtivo de paredes de concreto monolíticas moldadas in loco.Universidade Tecnológica Federal do ParanáCuritibaBrasilGraduação em Engenharia CivilUTFPRMedeiros, ArthurMedeiros, ArthurScandelari, Vanessa do Rocio NahhasVarisco, Marcelo QueirozLara, Bruna Stocco dePilonetto, Camila Vandresen2020-11-11T13:23:26Z2020-11-11T13:23:26Z2016-06-23info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesisapplication/pdfLARA, Bruna Stocco; PILONETTO, Camila Vandresen. Comparação entre os sistemas construtivos de alvenaria estrutural e paredes de concreto monolíticas moldadas in loco. 2016. 179 f. Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso (Graduação em Engenharia Civil) - Universidade Tecnológica do Paraná, Curitiba, 2016.http://repositorio.utfpr.edu.br/jspui/handle/1/8080porinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UTFPR (da Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (RIUT))instname:Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR)instacron:UTFPR2020-11-11T13:23:26Zoai:repositorio.utfpr.edu.br:1/8080Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.utfpr.edu.br:8080/oai/requestriut@utfpr.edu.bropendoar:2020-11-11T13:23:26Repositório Institucional da UTFPR (da Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (RIUT)) - Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparação entre os sistemas construtivos de alvenaria estrutural e paredes de concreto monolíticas moldadas in loco
Comparison between building systems structural masonry and walls of monolithic concrete molded on site
title Comparação entre os sistemas construtivos de alvenaria estrutural e paredes de concreto monolíticas moldadas in loco
spellingShingle Comparação entre os sistemas construtivos de alvenaria estrutural e paredes de concreto monolíticas moldadas in loco
Lara, Bruna Stocco de
Alvenaria
Paredes
Concreto
Custo
Masonry
Análise estrutural (Engenharia)
Engenharia civil
Walls
Concrete
Cost
Structural analysis (Engineering)
Civil engineering
CNPQ::ENGENHARIAS::ENGENHARIA CIVIL::CONSTRUCAO CIVIL::PROCESSOS CONSTRUTIVOS
title_short Comparação entre os sistemas construtivos de alvenaria estrutural e paredes de concreto monolíticas moldadas in loco
title_full Comparação entre os sistemas construtivos de alvenaria estrutural e paredes de concreto monolíticas moldadas in loco
title_fullStr Comparação entre os sistemas construtivos de alvenaria estrutural e paredes de concreto monolíticas moldadas in loco
title_full_unstemmed Comparação entre os sistemas construtivos de alvenaria estrutural e paredes de concreto monolíticas moldadas in loco
title_sort Comparação entre os sistemas construtivos de alvenaria estrutural e paredes de concreto monolíticas moldadas in loco
author Lara, Bruna Stocco de
author_facet Lara, Bruna Stocco de
Pilonetto, Camila Vandresen
author_role author
author2 Pilonetto, Camila Vandresen
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Medeiros, Arthur
Medeiros, Arthur
Scandelari, Vanessa do Rocio Nahhas
Varisco, Marcelo Queiroz
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lara, Bruna Stocco de
Pilonetto, Camila Vandresen
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Alvenaria
Paredes
Concreto
Custo
Masonry
Análise estrutural (Engenharia)
Engenharia civil
Walls
Concrete
Cost
Structural analysis (Engineering)
Civil engineering
CNPQ::ENGENHARIAS::ENGENHARIA CIVIL::CONSTRUCAO CIVIL::PROCESSOS CONSTRUTIVOS
topic Alvenaria
Paredes
Concreto
Custo
Masonry
Análise estrutural (Engenharia)
Engenharia civil
Walls
Concrete
Cost
Structural analysis (Engineering)
Civil engineering
CNPQ::ENGENHARIAS::ENGENHARIA CIVIL::CONSTRUCAO CIVIL::PROCESSOS CONSTRUTIVOS
description New technologies in building systems are becoming more popular in the national market. In 2009, in order to meet the housing deficit generated by the unplanned development in Brazil, the federal government created the program Minha Casa Minha Vida, which resulted in a serie of changes in the way of how popular buildings in the country way are made. After setting up the program arose the need to have greater control over the new works, thus giving upgrade to PBQP-H (Brazilian Program of Habitat Quality and Productivity) which in turn led builders to seek unconventional building systems. This study deals with just two of these systems, structural masonry and walls of monolithic concrete molded on site, comparing them as the cost and time. The need for this analysis is based on the difficulties currently faced by national construction companies to obtain interesting financial results in a little hot market and with small profit margins, thus a constructive system presenting waste and term lower performance, is of extreme interest. In order to assist in the most advantageous construction system selection will be presented comparative data, including a budget of a model block for each system and their schedules as well as further analysis of variance overhead, reaching a parameter spreadsheet that allows to choose the better construction system for a given number of blocks of apartments. The compilation of these data arrives at a parameterization sheet, which allows choosing the best construction system for a given number of blocks of apartments. These allow to conclude that the construction system of structural masonry is more advantageous to perform up to 3 blocks of apartments and amounts above, within the simulation would be more interesting to select the structural system of concrete monolithic walls molded on site.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-06-23
2020-11-11T13:23:26Z
2020-11-11T13:23:26Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis
format bachelorThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv LARA, Bruna Stocco; PILONETTO, Camila Vandresen. Comparação entre os sistemas construtivos de alvenaria estrutural e paredes de concreto monolíticas moldadas in loco. 2016. 179 f. Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso (Graduação em Engenharia Civil) - Universidade Tecnológica do Paraná, Curitiba, 2016.
http://repositorio.utfpr.edu.br/jspui/handle/1/8080
identifier_str_mv LARA, Bruna Stocco; PILONETTO, Camila Vandresen. Comparação entre os sistemas construtivos de alvenaria estrutural e paredes de concreto monolíticas moldadas in loco. 2016. 179 f. Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso (Graduação em Engenharia Civil) - Universidade Tecnológica do Paraná, Curitiba, 2016.
url http://repositorio.utfpr.edu.br/jspui/handle/1/8080
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná
Curitiba
Brasil
Graduação em Engenharia Civil
UTFPR
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná
Curitiba
Brasil
Graduação em Engenharia Civil
UTFPR
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UTFPR (da Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (RIUT))
instname:Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR)
instacron:UTFPR
instname_str Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR)
instacron_str UTFPR
institution UTFPR
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UTFPR (da Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (RIUT))
collection Repositório Institucional da UTFPR (da Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (RIUT))
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UTFPR (da Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (RIUT)) - Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv riut@utfpr.edu.br
_version_ 1834836327931052032