Frequency, types, and potential clinical significance of medication-dispensing errors

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bohand, Xavier
Data de Publicação: 2009
Outros Autores: Simon, Laurent, Perrier, Eric, Mullot, Hélène, Lefeuvre, Leslie, Plotton, Christian
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Clinics
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/17870
Resumo: INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Many dispensing errors occur in the hospital, and these can endanger patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the rate of dispensing errors by a unit dose drug dispensing system, to categorize the most frequent types of errors, and to evaluate their potential clinical significance. METHODS: A prospective study using a direct observation method to detect medication-dispensing errors was used. From March 2007 to April 2007, "errors detected by pharmacists" and "errors detected by nurses" were recorded under six categories: unauthorized drug, incorrect form of drug, improper dose, omission, incorrect time, and deteriorated drug errors. The potential clinical significance of the "errors detected by nurses" was evaluated. RESULTS: Among the 734 filled medication cassettes, 179 errors were detected corresponding to a total of 7249 correctly fulfilled and omitted unit doses. An overall error rate of 2.5% was found. Errors detected by pharmacists and nurses represented 155 (86.6%) and 24 (13.4%) of the 179 errors, respectively. The most frequent types of errors were improper dose (n = 57, 31.8%) and omission (n = 54, 30.2%). Nearly 45% of the 24 errors detected by nurses had the potential to cause a significant (n = 7, 29.2%) or serious (n = 4, 16.6%) adverse drug event. CONCLUSIONS: Even if none of the errors reached the patients in this study, a 2.5% error rate indicates the need for improving the unit dose drug-dispensing system. Furthermore, it is almost certain that this study failed to detect some medication errors, further arguing for strategies to prevent their recurrence.
id USP-19_2be2bf08c6eda9f03a2f4e35bf5e2c72
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/17870
network_acronym_str USP-19
network_name_str Clinics
repository_id_str
spelling Frequency, types, and potential clinical significance of medication-dispensing errors Adverse EventDrug ErrorPatient securityRisk ManagementUnit Dose INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Many dispensing errors occur in the hospital, and these can endanger patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the rate of dispensing errors by a unit dose drug dispensing system, to categorize the most frequent types of errors, and to evaluate their potential clinical significance. METHODS: A prospective study using a direct observation method to detect medication-dispensing errors was used. From March 2007 to April 2007, "errors detected by pharmacists" and "errors detected by nurses" were recorded under six categories: unauthorized drug, incorrect form of drug, improper dose, omission, incorrect time, and deteriorated drug errors. The potential clinical significance of the "errors detected by nurses" was evaluated. RESULTS: Among the 734 filled medication cassettes, 179 errors were detected corresponding to a total of 7249 correctly fulfilled and omitted unit doses. An overall error rate of 2.5% was found. Errors detected by pharmacists and nurses represented 155 (86.6%) and 24 (13.4%) of the 179 errors, respectively. The most frequent types of errors were improper dose (n = 57, 31.8%) and omission (n = 54, 30.2%). Nearly 45% of the 24 errors detected by nurses had the potential to cause a significant (n = 7, 29.2%) or serious (n = 4, 16.6%) adverse drug event. CONCLUSIONS: Even if none of the errors reached the patients in this study, a 2.5% error rate indicates the need for improving the unit dose drug-dispensing system. Furthermore, it is almost certain that this study failed to detect some medication errors, further arguing for strategies to prevent their recurrence. Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2009-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/1787010.1590/S1807-59322009000100003Clinics; Vol. 64 No. 1 (2009); 11-16 Clinics; v. 64 n. 1 (2009); 11-16 Clinics; Vol. 64 Núm. 1 (2009); 11-16 1980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/17870/19935Bohand, XavierSimon, LaurentPerrier, EricMullot, HélèneLefeuvre, LesliePlotton, Christianinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2012-05-22T18:41:05Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/17870Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2012-05-22T18:41:05Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Frequency, types, and potential clinical significance of medication-dispensing errors
title Frequency, types, and potential clinical significance of medication-dispensing errors
spellingShingle Frequency, types, and potential clinical significance of medication-dispensing errors
Bohand, Xavier
Adverse Event
Drug Error
Patient security
Risk Management
Unit Dose
title_short Frequency, types, and potential clinical significance of medication-dispensing errors
title_full Frequency, types, and potential clinical significance of medication-dispensing errors
title_fullStr Frequency, types, and potential clinical significance of medication-dispensing errors
title_full_unstemmed Frequency, types, and potential clinical significance of medication-dispensing errors
title_sort Frequency, types, and potential clinical significance of medication-dispensing errors
author Bohand, Xavier
author_facet Bohand, Xavier
Simon, Laurent
Perrier, Eric
Mullot, Hélène
Lefeuvre, Leslie
Plotton, Christian
author_role author
author2 Simon, Laurent
Perrier, Eric
Mullot, Hélène
Lefeuvre, Leslie
Plotton, Christian
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bohand, Xavier
Simon, Laurent
Perrier, Eric
Mullot, Hélène
Lefeuvre, Leslie
Plotton, Christian
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Adverse Event
Drug Error
Patient security
Risk Management
Unit Dose
topic Adverse Event
Drug Error
Patient security
Risk Management
Unit Dose
description INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Many dispensing errors occur in the hospital, and these can endanger patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the rate of dispensing errors by a unit dose drug dispensing system, to categorize the most frequent types of errors, and to evaluate their potential clinical significance. METHODS: A prospective study using a direct observation method to detect medication-dispensing errors was used. From March 2007 to April 2007, "errors detected by pharmacists" and "errors detected by nurses" were recorded under six categories: unauthorized drug, incorrect form of drug, improper dose, omission, incorrect time, and deteriorated drug errors. The potential clinical significance of the "errors detected by nurses" was evaluated. RESULTS: Among the 734 filled medication cassettes, 179 errors were detected corresponding to a total of 7249 correctly fulfilled and omitted unit doses. An overall error rate of 2.5% was found. Errors detected by pharmacists and nurses represented 155 (86.6%) and 24 (13.4%) of the 179 errors, respectively. The most frequent types of errors were improper dose (n = 57, 31.8%) and omission (n = 54, 30.2%). Nearly 45% of the 24 errors detected by nurses had the potential to cause a significant (n = 7, 29.2%) or serious (n = 4, 16.6%) adverse drug event. CONCLUSIONS: Even if none of the errors reached the patients in this study, a 2.5% error rate indicates the need for improving the unit dose drug-dispensing system. Furthermore, it is almost certain that this study failed to detect some medication errors, further arguing for strategies to prevent their recurrence.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/17870
10.1590/S1807-59322009000100003
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/17870
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S1807-59322009000100003
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/17870/19935
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Clinics; Vol. 64 No. 1 (2009); 11-16
Clinics; v. 64 n. 1 (2009); 11-16
Clinics; Vol. 64 Núm. 1 (2009); 11-16
1980-5322
1807-5932
reponame:Clinics
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Clinics
collection Clinics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br
_version_ 1824324333414121472