Frequency, types, and potential clinical significance of medication-dispensing errors
| Autor(a) principal: | |
|---|---|
| Data de Publicação: | 2009 |
| Outros Autores: | , , , , |
| Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
| Idioma: | eng |
| Título da fonte: | Clinics |
| Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/17870 |
Resumo: | INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Many dispensing errors occur in the hospital, and these can endanger patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the rate of dispensing errors by a unit dose drug dispensing system, to categorize the most frequent types of errors, and to evaluate their potential clinical significance. METHODS: A prospective study using a direct observation method to detect medication-dispensing errors was used. From March 2007 to April 2007, "errors detected by pharmacists" and "errors detected by nurses" were recorded under six categories: unauthorized drug, incorrect form of drug, improper dose, omission, incorrect time, and deteriorated drug errors. The potential clinical significance of the "errors detected by nurses" was evaluated. RESULTS: Among the 734 filled medication cassettes, 179 errors were detected corresponding to a total of 7249 correctly fulfilled and omitted unit doses. An overall error rate of 2.5% was found. Errors detected by pharmacists and nurses represented 155 (86.6%) and 24 (13.4%) of the 179 errors, respectively. The most frequent types of errors were improper dose (n = 57, 31.8%) and omission (n = 54, 30.2%). Nearly 45% of the 24 errors detected by nurses had the potential to cause a significant (n = 7, 29.2%) or serious (n = 4, 16.6%) adverse drug event. CONCLUSIONS: Even if none of the errors reached the patients in this study, a 2.5% error rate indicates the need for improving the unit dose drug-dispensing system. Furthermore, it is almost certain that this study failed to detect some medication errors, further arguing for strategies to prevent their recurrence. |
| id |
USP-19_2be2bf08c6eda9f03a2f4e35bf5e2c72 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/17870 |
| network_acronym_str |
USP-19 |
| network_name_str |
Clinics |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Frequency, types, and potential clinical significance of medication-dispensing errors Adverse EventDrug ErrorPatient securityRisk ManagementUnit Dose INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Many dispensing errors occur in the hospital, and these can endanger patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the rate of dispensing errors by a unit dose drug dispensing system, to categorize the most frequent types of errors, and to evaluate their potential clinical significance. METHODS: A prospective study using a direct observation method to detect medication-dispensing errors was used. From March 2007 to April 2007, "errors detected by pharmacists" and "errors detected by nurses" were recorded under six categories: unauthorized drug, incorrect form of drug, improper dose, omission, incorrect time, and deteriorated drug errors. The potential clinical significance of the "errors detected by nurses" was evaluated. RESULTS: Among the 734 filled medication cassettes, 179 errors were detected corresponding to a total of 7249 correctly fulfilled and omitted unit doses. An overall error rate of 2.5% was found. Errors detected by pharmacists and nurses represented 155 (86.6%) and 24 (13.4%) of the 179 errors, respectively. The most frequent types of errors were improper dose (n = 57, 31.8%) and omission (n = 54, 30.2%). Nearly 45% of the 24 errors detected by nurses had the potential to cause a significant (n = 7, 29.2%) or serious (n = 4, 16.6%) adverse drug event. CONCLUSIONS: Even if none of the errors reached the patients in this study, a 2.5% error rate indicates the need for improving the unit dose drug-dispensing system. Furthermore, it is almost certain that this study failed to detect some medication errors, further arguing for strategies to prevent their recurrence. Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2009-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/1787010.1590/S1807-59322009000100003Clinics; Vol. 64 No. 1 (2009); 11-16 Clinics; v. 64 n. 1 (2009); 11-16 Clinics; Vol. 64 Núm. 1 (2009); 11-16 1980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/17870/19935Bohand, XavierSimon, LaurentPerrier, EricMullot, HélèneLefeuvre, LesliePlotton, Christianinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2012-05-22T18:41:05Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/17870Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2012-05-22T18:41:05Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Frequency, types, and potential clinical significance of medication-dispensing errors |
| title |
Frequency, types, and potential clinical significance of medication-dispensing errors |
| spellingShingle |
Frequency, types, and potential clinical significance of medication-dispensing errors Bohand, Xavier Adverse Event Drug Error Patient security Risk Management Unit Dose |
| title_short |
Frequency, types, and potential clinical significance of medication-dispensing errors |
| title_full |
Frequency, types, and potential clinical significance of medication-dispensing errors |
| title_fullStr |
Frequency, types, and potential clinical significance of medication-dispensing errors |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Frequency, types, and potential clinical significance of medication-dispensing errors |
| title_sort |
Frequency, types, and potential clinical significance of medication-dispensing errors |
| author |
Bohand, Xavier |
| author_facet |
Bohand, Xavier Simon, Laurent Perrier, Eric Mullot, Hélène Lefeuvre, Leslie Plotton, Christian |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Simon, Laurent Perrier, Eric Mullot, Hélène Lefeuvre, Leslie Plotton, Christian |
| author2_role |
author author author author author |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bohand, Xavier Simon, Laurent Perrier, Eric Mullot, Hélène Lefeuvre, Leslie Plotton, Christian |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Adverse Event Drug Error Patient security Risk Management Unit Dose |
| topic |
Adverse Event Drug Error Patient security Risk Management Unit Dose |
| description |
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Many dispensing errors occur in the hospital, and these can endanger patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the rate of dispensing errors by a unit dose drug dispensing system, to categorize the most frequent types of errors, and to evaluate their potential clinical significance. METHODS: A prospective study using a direct observation method to detect medication-dispensing errors was used. From March 2007 to April 2007, "errors detected by pharmacists" and "errors detected by nurses" were recorded under six categories: unauthorized drug, incorrect form of drug, improper dose, omission, incorrect time, and deteriorated drug errors. The potential clinical significance of the "errors detected by nurses" was evaluated. RESULTS: Among the 734 filled medication cassettes, 179 errors were detected corresponding to a total of 7249 correctly fulfilled and omitted unit doses. An overall error rate of 2.5% was found. Errors detected by pharmacists and nurses represented 155 (86.6%) and 24 (13.4%) of the 179 errors, respectively. The most frequent types of errors were improper dose (n = 57, 31.8%) and omission (n = 54, 30.2%). Nearly 45% of the 24 errors detected by nurses had the potential to cause a significant (n = 7, 29.2%) or serious (n = 4, 16.6%) adverse drug event. CONCLUSIONS: Even if none of the errors reached the patients in this study, a 2.5% error rate indicates the need for improving the unit dose drug-dispensing system. Furthermore, it is almost certain that this study failed to detect some medication errors, further arguing for strategies to prevent their recurrence. |
| publishDate |
2009 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2009-01-01 |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/17870 10.1590/S1807-59322009000100003 |
| url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/17870 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/S1807-59322009000100003 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/17870/19935 |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Clinics; Vol. 64 No. 1 (2009); 11-16 Clinics; v. 64 n. 1 (2009); 11-16 Clinics; Vol. 64 Núm. 1 (2009); 11-16 1980-5322 1807-5932 reponame:Clinics instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
| instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
| instacron_str |
USP |
| institution |
USP |
| reponame_str |
Clinics |
| collection |
Clinics |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br |
| _version_ |
1824324333414121472 |