Export Ready — 

Post-exercise Hypotension Following a Single Bout of High Intensity Interval Exercise vs. a Single Bout of Moderate Intensity Continuous Exercise in Adults With or Without Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Marçal, Isabela Roque [UNESP]
Publication Date: 2021
Other Authors: Goessler, Karla Fabiana, Buys, Roselien, Casonatto, Juliano, Ciolac, Emmanuel Gomes [UNESP], Cornelissen, Véronique A.
Format: Other
Language: eng
Source: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Download full: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.675289
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/233258
Summary: Background: Post-exercise hypotension (PEH) is an important tool in the daily management of patients with hypertension. Varying the exercise parameters is likely to change the blood pressure (BP) response following a bout of exercise. In recent years, high-intensity interval exercise (HIIE) has gained significant popularity in exercise-based prevention and rehabilitation of clinical populations. Yet, to date, it is not known whether a single session of HIIE maximizes PEH more than a bout of moderate-intensity continuous exercise (MICE). Objective: To compare the effect of HIIE vs. MICE on PEH by means of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: A systematic search in the electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, and SPORTDiscus was conducted from the earliest date available until February 24, 2020. Randomized clinical trials comparing the transient effect of a single bout of HIIE to MICE on office and/or ambulatory BP in humans (≥18 years) were included. Data were pooled using random effects models with summary data reported as weighted means and 95% confidence interval (CIs). Results: Data from 14 trials were included, involving 18 comparisons between HIIE and MICE and 276 (193 males) participants. The immediate effects, measured as office BP at 30- and 60-min post-exercise, was similar for a bout of HIIE and MICE (p > 0.05 for systolic and diastolic BP). However, HIIE elicited a more pronounced BP reduction than MICE [(−5.3 mmHg (−7.3 to −3.3)/ −1.63 mmHg (−3.00 to −0.26)] during the subsequent hours of ambulatory daytime monitoring. No differences were observed for ambulatory nighttime BP (p > 0.05). Conclusion: HIIE promoted a larger PEH than MICE on ambulatory daytime BP. However, the number of studies was low, patients were mostly young to middle-aged individuals, and only a few studies included patients with hypertension. Therefore, there is a need for studies that involve older individuals with hypertension and use ambulatory BP monitoring to confirm HIIE's superiority as a safe BP lowering intervention in today's clinical practice. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42020171640).
id UNSP_fbeaee0e86ccc3e3b92fa94da8c67fe8
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/233258
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Post-exercise Hypotension Following a Single Bout of High Intensity Interval Exercise vs. a Single Bout of Moderate Intensity Continuous Exercise in Adults With or Without Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trialsambulatory blood pressurehigh intensity interval exercisehypotensionmoderate intensity aerobic exerciseoffice blood pressurepost-exercicesystematic review & meta-analysisBackground: Post-exercise hypotension (PEH) is an important tool in the daily management of patients with hypertension. Varying the exercise parameters is likely to change the blood pressure (BP) response following a bout of exercise. In recent years, high-intensity interval exercise (HIIE) has gained significant popularity in exercise-based prevention and rehabilitation of clinical populations. Yet, to date, it is not known whether a single session of HIIE maximizes PEH more than a bout of moderate-intensity continuous exercise (MICE). Objective: To compare the effect of HIIE vs. MICE on PEH by means of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: A systematic search in the electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, and SPORTDiscus was conducted from the earliest date available until February 24, 2020. Randomized clinical trials comparing the transient effect of a single bout of HIIE to MICE on office and/or ambulatory BP in humans (≥18 years) were included. Data were pooled using random effects models with summary data reported as weighted means and 95% confidence interval (CIs). Results: Data from 14 trials were included, involving 18 comparisons between HIIE and MICE and 276 (193 males) participants. The immediate effects, measured as office BP at 30- and 60-min post-exercise, was similar for a bout of HIIE and MICE (p > 0.05 for systolic and diastolic BP). However, HIIE elicited a more pronounced BP reduction than MICE [(−5.3 mmHg (−7.3 to −3.3)/ −1.63 mmHg (−3.00 to −0.26)] during the subsequent hours of ambulatory daytime monitoring. No differences were observed for ambulatory nighttime BP (p > 0.05). Conclusion: HIIE promoted a larger PEH than MICE on ambulatory daytime BP. However, the number of studies was low, patients were mostly young to middle-aged individuals, and only a few studies included patients with hypertension. Therefore, there is a need for studies that involve older individuals with hypertension and use ambulatory BP monitoring to confirm HIIE's superiority as a safe BP lowering intervention in today's clinical practice. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42020171640).Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Exercise and Chronic Disease Research Laboratory Department of Physical Education School of Sciences São Paulo State University (UNESP)Research Group for Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Department of Rehabilitation Sciences University of Leuven KU LeuvenApplied Physiology and Nutrition Research Group School of Physical Education and Sport Faculty of Medicine (FMUSP) University of Saõ PauloResearch Group in Physiology and Physical Activity University of Northern ParanáExercise and Chronic Disease Research Laboratory Department of Physical Education School of Sciences São Paulo State University (UNESP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)KU LeuvenUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)University of Northern ParanáMarçal, Isabela Roque [UNESP]Goessler, Karla FabianaBuys, RoselienCasonatto, JulianoCiolac, Emmanuel Gomes [UNESP]Cornelissen, Véronique A.2022-05-01T06:02:18Z2022-05-01T06:02:18Z2021-06-28info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.675289Frontiers in Physiology, v. 12.1664-042Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/23325810.3389/fphys.2021.6752892-s2.0-85109938571Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengFrontiers in Physiologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-24T18:53:45Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/233258Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-04-24T18:53:45Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Post-exercise Hypotension Following a Single Bout of High Intensity Interval Exercise vs. a Single Bout of Moderate Intensity Continuous Exercise in Adults With or Without Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
title Post-exercise Hypotension Following a Single Bout of High Intensity Interval Exercise vs. a Single Bout of Moderate Intensity Continuous Exercise in Adults With or Without Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
spellingShingle Post-exercise Hypotension Following a Single Bout of High Intensity Interval Exercise vs. a Single Bout of Moderate Intensity Continuous Exercise in Adults With or Without Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
Marçal, Isabela Roque [UNESP]
ambulatory blood pressure
high intensity interval exercise
hypotension
moderate intensity aerobic exercise
office blood pressure
post-exercice
systematic review & meta-analysis
title_short Post-exercise Hypotension Following a Single Bout of High Intensity Interval Exercise vs. a Single Bout of Moderate Intensity Continuous Exercise in Adults With or Without Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
title_full Post-exercise Hypotension Following a Single Bout of High Intensity Interval Exercise vs. a Single Bout of Moderate Intensity Continuous Exercise in Adults With or Without Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
title_fullStr Post-exercise Hypotension Following a Single Bout of High Intensity Interval Exercise vs. a Single Bout of Moderate Intensity Continuous Exercise in Adults With or Without Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
title_full_unstemmed Post-exercise Hypotension Following a Single Bout of High Intensity Interval Exercise vs. a Single Bout of Moderate Intensity Continuous Exercise in Adults With or Without Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
title_sort Post-exercise Hypotension Following a Single Bout of High Intensity Interval Exercise vs. a Single Bout of Moderate Intensity Continuous Exercise in Adults With or Without Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
author Marçal, Isabela Roque [UNESP]
author_facet Marçal, Isabela Roque [UNESP]
Goessler, Karla Fabiana
Buys, Roselien
Casonatto, Juliano
Ciolac, Emmanuel Gomes [UNESP]
Cornelissen, Véronique A.
author_role author
author2 Goessler, Karla Fabiana
Buys, Roselien
Casonatto, Juliano
Ciolac, Emmanuel Gomes [UNESP]
Cornelissen, Véronique A.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
KU Leuven
Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
University of Northern Paraná
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Marçal, Isabela Roque [UNESP]
Goessler, Karla Fabiana
Buys, Roselien
Casonatto, Juliano
Ciolac, Emmanuel Gomes [UNESP]
Cornelissen, Véronique A.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv ambulatory blood pressure
high intensity interval exercise
hypotension
moderate intensity aerobic exercise
office blood pressure
post-exercice
systematic review & meta-analysis
topic ambulatory blood pressure
high intensity interval exercise
hypotension
moderate intensity aerobic exercise
office blood pressure
post-exercice
systematic review & meta-analysis
description Background: Post-exercise hypotension (PEH) is an important tool in the daily management of patients with hypertension. Varying the exercise parameters is likely to change the blood pressure (BP) response following a bout of exercise. In recent years, high-intensity interval exercise (HIIE) has gained significant popularity in exercise-based prevention and rehabilitation of clinical populations. Yet, to date, it is not known whether a single session of HIIE maximizes PEH more than a bout of moderate-intensity continuous exercise (MICE). Objective: To compare the effect of HIIE vs. MICE on PEH by means of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: A systematic search in the electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, and SPORTDiscus was conducted from the earliest date available until February 24, 2020. Randomized clinical trials comparing the transient effect of a single bout of HIIE to MICE on office and/or ambulatory BP in humans (≥18 years) were included. Data were pooled using random effects models with summary data reported as weighted means and 95% confidence interval (CIs). Results: Data from 14 trials were included, involving 18 comparisons between HIIE and MICE and 276 (193 males) participants. The immediate effects, measured as office BP at 30- and 60-min post-exercise, was similar for a bout of HIIE and MICE (p > 0.05 for systolic and diastolic BP). However, HIIE elicited a more pronounced BP reduction than MICE [(−5.3 mmHg (−7.3 to −3.3)/ −1.63 mmHg (−3.00 to −0.26)] during the subsequent hours of ambulatory daytime monitoring. No differences were observed for ambulatory nighttime BP (p > 0.05). Conclusion: HIIE promoted a larger PEH than MICE on ambulatory daytime BP. However, the number of studies was low, patients were mostly young to middle-aged individuals, and only a few studies included patients with hypertension. Therefore, there is a need for studies that involve older individuals with hypertension and use ambulatory BP monitoring to confirm HIIE's superiority as a safe BP lowering intervention in today's clinical practice. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42020171640).
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-28
2022-05-01T06:02:18Z
2022-05-01T06:02:18Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format other
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.675289
Frontiers in Physiology, v. 12.
1664-042X
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/233258
10.3389/fphys.2021.675289
2-s2.0-85109938571
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.675289
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/233258
identifier_str_mv Frontiers in Physiology, v. 12.
1664-042X
10.3389/fphys.2021.675289
2-s2.0-85109938571
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Frontiers in Physiology
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1834483580577775616