Export Ready — 

MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: SOIL COVER AND COMPACTION, LONGITUDINAL DISTRIBUTION, AND YIELD OF SOYBEAN CROP

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cortez, Jorge W.
Publication Date: 2019
Other Authors: Pusch, Maiara, Silva, Rouverson P. da [UNESP], Rufino, Mauricio, Anghinoni, Matheus
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Download full: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v39n4p490-497/2019
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/186823
Summary: The way the soil is managed can influence its structuring and, consequently, crop yield. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the effect caused by the management systems plowing followed by two intermediate harrowing operations, intermediate harrowing, chiseling, chiseling followed by intermediate harrowing, cross chiseling followed by intermediate harrowing, and non-tillage on soil and agronomic attributes of the soybean crop. A randomized block design with four replications was used. The percentage of soil cover, soil resistance to penetration, number of plants per meter, longitudinal distribution of seedlings, and soybean yield were evaluated. The data were submitted to analysis of variance by the Tukey test at 5% probability, and use of geostatistics for soil resistance to penetration. The system without soil tillage provides the best straw preservation but affects the longitudinal distribution of soybean seedlings. The use of intermediate harrowing for managing crop residues or soil tillage leads to the greatest compaction problems. Chiseling is efficient in maintaining compaction values below critical values up to a depth of 0.20 m when working at 0.35 m. Soil yield is not affected by soil management systems when the pluviometric regime is adequate to crop requirements.
id UNSP_d95aa184276754186893dba871937e7c
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/186823
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: SOIL COVER AND COMPACTION, LONGITUDINAL DISTRIBUTION, AND YIELD OF SOYBEAN CROPresistance to penetrationgeostatisticssoil tillageThe way the soil is managed can influence its structuring and, consequently, crop yield. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the effect caused by the management systems plowing followed by two intermediate harrowing operations, intermediate harrowing, chiseling, chiseling followed by intermediate harrowing, cross chiseling followed by intermediate harrowing, and non-tillage on soil and agronomic attributes of the soybean crop. A randomized block design with four replications was used. The percentage of soil cover, soil resistance to penetration, number of plants per meter, longitudinal distribution of seedlings, and soybean yield were evaluated. The data were submitted to analysis of variance by the Tukey test at 5% probability, and use of geostatistics for soil resistance to penetration. The system without soil tillage provides the best straw preservation but affects the longitudinal distribution of soybean seedlings. The use of intermediate harrowing for managing crop residues or soil tillage leads to the greatest compaction problems. Chiseling is efficient in maintaining compaction values below critical values up to a depth of 0.20 m when working at 0.35 m. Soil yield is not affected by soil management systems when the pluviometric regime is adequate to crop requirements.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Fundacao Univ Fed Grande Dourados, Dourados, MS, BrazilUniv Estadual Campinas, Campinas, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal, SP, BrazilSoc Brasil Engenharia AgricolaFundacao Univ Fed Grande DouradosUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Cortez, Jorge W.Pusch, MaiaraSilva, Rouverson P. da [UNESP]Rufino, MauricioAnghinoni, Matheus2019-10-06T07:12:28Z2019-10-06T07:12:28Z2019-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article490-497application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v39n4p490-497/2019Engenharia Agricola. Jaboticabal: Soc Brasil Engenharia Agricola, v. 39, n. 4, p. 490-497, 2019.0100-6916http://hdl.handle.net/11449/18682310.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v39n4p490-497/2019S0100-69162019000400490WOS:000480439500010S0100-69162019000400490.pdfWeb of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengEngenharia Agricolainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-06T15:17:55Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/186823Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462025-03-28T14:15:06.361078Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: SOIL COVER AND COMPACTION, LONGITUDINAL DISTRIBUTION, AND YIELD OF SOYBEAN CROP
title MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: SOIL COVER AND COMPACTION, LONGITUDINAL DISTRIBUTION, AND YIELD OF SOYBEAN CROP
spellingShingle MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: SOIL COVER AND COMPACTION, LONGITUDINAL DISTRIBUTION, AND YIELD OF SOYBEAN CROP
Cortez, Jorge W.
resistance to penetration
geostatistics
soil tillage
title_short MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: SOIL COVER AND COMPACTION, LONGITUDINAL DISTRIBUTION, AND YIELD OF SOYBEAN CROP
title_full MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: SOIL COVER AND COMPACTION, LONGITUDINAL DISTRIBUTION, AND YIELD OF SOYBEAN CROP
title_fullStr MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: SOIL COVER AND COMPACTION, LONGITUDINAL DISTRIBUTION, AND YIELD OF SOYBEAN CROP
title_full_unstemmed MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: SOIL COVER AND COMPACTION, LONGITUDINAL DISTRIBUTION, AND YIELD OF SOYBEAN CROP
title_sort MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: SOIL COVER AND COMPACTION, LONGITUDINAL DISTRIBUTION, AND YIELD OF SOYBEAN CROP
author Cortez, Jorge W.
author_facet Cortez, Jorge W.
Pusch, Maiara
Silva, Rouverson P. da [UNESP]
Rufino, Mauricio
Anghinoni, Matheus
author_role author
author2 Pusch, Maiara
Silva, Rouverson P. da [UNESP]
Rufino, Mauricio
Anghinoni, Matheus
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Fundacao Univ Fed Grande Dourados
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cortez, Jorge W.
Pusch, Maiara
Silva, Rouverson P. da [UNESP]
Rufino, Mauricio
Anghinoni, Matheus
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv resistance to penetration
geostatistics
soil tillage
topic resistance to penetration
geostatistics
soil tillage
description The way the soil is managed can influence its structuring and, consequently, crop yield. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the effect caused by the management systems plowing followed by two intermediate harrowing operations, intermediate harrowing, chiseling, chiseling followed by intermediate harrowing, cross chiseling followed by intermediate harrowing, and non-tillage on soil and agronomic attributes of the soybean crop. A randomized block design with four replications was used. The percentage of soil cover, soil resistance to penetration, number of plants per meter, longitudinal distribution of seedlings, and soybean yield were evaluated. The data were submitted to analysis of variance by the Tukey test at 5% probability, and use of geostatistics for soil resistance to penetration. The system without soil tillage provides the best straw preservation but affects the longitudinal distribution of soybean seedlings. The use of intermediate harrowing for managing crop residues or soil tillage leads to the greatest compaction problems. Chiseling is efficient in maintaining compaction values below critical values up to a depth of 0.20 m when working at 0.35 m. Soil yield is not affected by soil management systems when the pluviometric regime is adequate to crop requirements.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-10-06T07:12:28Z
2019-10-06T07:12:28Z
2019-07-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v39n4p490-497/2019
Engenharia Agricola. Jaboticabal: Soc Brasil Engenharia Agricola, v. 39, n. 4, p. 490-497, 2019.
0100-6916
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/186823
10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v39n4p490-497/2019
S0100-69162019000400490
WOS:000480439500010
S0100-69162019000400490.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v39n4p490-497/2019
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/186823
identifier_str_mv Engenharia Agricola. Jaboticabal: Soc Brasil Engenharia Agricola, v. 39, n. 4, p. 490-497, 2019.
0100-6916
10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v39n4p490-497/2019
S0100-69162019000400490
WOS:000480439500010
S0100-69162019000400490.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Engenharia Agricola
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 490-497
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Soc Brasil Engenharia Agricola
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Soc Brasil Engenharia Agricola
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1834483013892702208