MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: SOIL COVER AND COMPACTION, LONGITUDINAL DISTRIBUTION, AND YIELD OF SOYBEAN CROP
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2019 |
Other Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Download full: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v39n4p490-497/2019 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/186823 |
Summary: | The way the soil is managed can influence its structuring and, consequently, crop yield. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the effect caused by the management systems plowing followed by two intermediate harrowing operations, intermediate harrowing, chiseling, chiseling followed by intermediate harrowing, cross chiseling followed by intermediate harrowing, and non-tillage on soil and agronomic attributes of the soybean crop. A randomized block design with four replications was used. The percentage of soil cover, soil resistance to penetration, number of plants per meter, longitudinal distribution of seedlings, and soybean yield were evaluated. The data were submitted to analysis of variance by the Tukey test at 5% probability, and use of geostatistics for soil resistance to penetration. The system without soil tillage provides the best straw preservation but affects the longitudinal distribution of soybean seedlings. The use of intermediate harrowing for managing crop residues or soil tillage leads to the greatest compaction problems. Chiseling is efficient in maintaining compaction values below critical values up to a depth of 0.20 m when working at 0.35 m. Soil yield is not affected by soil management systems when the pluviometric regime is adequate to crop requirements. |
id |
UNSP_d95aa184276754186893dba871937e7c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/186823 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: SOIL COVER AND COMPACTION, LONGITUDINAL DISTRIBUTION, AND YIELD OF SOYBEAN CROPresistance to penetrationgeostatisticssoil tillageThe way the soil is managed can influence its structuring and, consequently, crop yield. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the effect caused by the management systems plowing followed by two intermediate harrowing operations, intermediate harrowing, chiseling, chiseling followed by intermediate harrowing, cross chiseling followed by intermediate harrowing, and non-tillage on soil and agronomic attributes of the soybean crop. A randomized block design with four replications was used. The percentage of soil cover, soil resistance to penetration, number of plants per meter, longitudinal distribution of seedlings, and soybean yield were evaluated. The data were submitted to analysis of variance by the Tukey test at 5% probability, and use of geostatistics for soil resistance to penetration. The system without soil tillage provides the best straw preservation but affects the longitudinal distribution of soybean seedlings. The use of intermediate harrowing for managing crop residues or soil tillage leads to the greatest compaction problems. Chiseling is efficient in maintaining compaction values below critical values up to a depth of 0.20 m when working at 0.35 m. Soil yield is not affected by soil management systems when the pluviometric regime is adequate to crop requirements.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Fundacao Univ Fed Grande Dourados, Dourados, MS, BrazilUniv Estadual Campinas, Campinas, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal, SP, BrazilSoc Brasil Engenharia AgricolaFundacao Univ Fed Grande DouradosUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Cortez, Jorge W.Pusch, MaiaraSilva, Rouverson P. da [UNESP]Rufino, MauricioAnghinoni, Matheus2019-10-06T07:12:28Z2019-10-06T07:12:28Z2019-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article490-497application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v39n4p490-497/2019Engenharia Agricola. Jaboticabal: Soc Brasil Engenharia Agricola, v. 39, n. 4, p. 490-497, 2019.0100-6916http://hdl.handle.net/11449/18682310.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v39n4p490-497/2019S0100-69162019000400490WOS:000480439500010S0100-69162019000400490.pdfWeb of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengEngenharia Agricolainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-06T15:17:55Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/186823Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462025-03-28T14:15:06.361078Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: SOIL COVER AND COMPACTION, LONGITUDINAL DISTRIBUTION, AND YIELD OF SOYBEAN CROP |
title |
MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: SOIL COVER AND COMPACTION, LONGITUDINAL DISTRIBUTION, AND YIELD OF SOYBEAN CROP |
spellingShingle |
MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: SOIL COVER AND COMPACTION, LONGITUDINAL DISTRIBUTION, AND YIELD OF SOYBEAN CROP Cortez, Jorge W. resistance to penetration geostatistics soil tillage |
title_short |
MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: SOIL COVER AND COMPACTION, LONGITUDINAL DISTRIBUTION, AND YIELD OF SOYBEAN CROP |
title_full |
MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: SOIL COVER AND COMPACTION, LONGITUDINAL DISTRIBUTION, AND YIELD OF SOYBEAN CROP |
title_fullStr |
MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: SOIL COVER AND COMPACTION, LONGITUDINAL DISTRIBUTION, AND YIELD OF SOYBEAN CROP |
title_full_unstemmed |
MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: SOIL COVER AND COMPACTION, LONGITUDINAL DISTRIBUTION, AND YIELD OF SOYBEAN CROP |
title_sort |
MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: SOIL COVER AND COMPACTION, LONGITUDINAL DISTRIBUTION, AND YIELD OF SOYBEAN CROP |
author |
Cortez, Jorge W. |
author_facet |
Cortez, Jorge W. Pusch, Maiara Silva, Rouverson P. da [UNESP] Rufino, Mauricio Anghinoni, Matheus |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pusch, Maiara Silva, Rouverson P. da [UNESP] Rufino, Mauricio Anghinoni, Matheus |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundacao Univ Fed Grande Dourados Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cortez, Jorge W. Pusch, Maiara Silva, Rouverson P. da [UNESP] Rufino, Mauricio Anghinoni, Matheus |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
resistance to penetration geostatistics soil tillage |
topic |
resistance to penetration geostatistics soil tillage |
description |
The way the soil is managed can influence its structuring and, consequently, crop yield. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the effect caused by the management systems plowing followed by two intermediate harrowing operations, intermediate harrowing, chiseling, chiseling followed by intermediate harrowing, cross chiseling followed by intermediate harrowing, and non-tillage on soil and agronomic attributes of the soybean crop. A randomized block design with four replications was used. The percentage of soil cover, soil resistance to penetration, number of plants per meter, longitudinal distribution of seedlings, and soybean yield were evaluated. The data were submitted to analysis of variance by the Tukey test at 5% probability, and use of geostatistics for soil resistance to penetration. The system without soil tillage provides the best straw preservation but affects the longitudinal distribution of soybean seedlings. The use of intermediate harrowing for managing crop residues or soil tillage leads to the greatest compaction problems. Chiseling is efficient in maintaining compaction values below critical values up to a depth of 0.20 m when working at 0.35 m. Soil yield is not affected by soil management systems when the pluviometric regime is adequate to crop requirements. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-10-06T07:12:28Z 2019-10-06T07:12:28Z 2019-07-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v39n4p490-497/2019 Engenharia Agricola. Jaboticabal: Soc Brasil Engenharia Agricola, v. 39, n. 4, p. 490-497, 2019. 0100-6916 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/186823 10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v39n4p490-497/2019 S0100-69162019000400490 WOS:000480439500010 S0100-69162019000400490.pdf |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v39n4p490-497/2019 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/186823 |
identifier_str_mv |
Engenharia Agricola. Jaboticabal: Soc Brasil Engenharia Agricola, v. 39, n. 4, p. 490-497, 2019. 0100-6916 10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v39n4p490-497/2019 S0100-69162019000400490 WOS:000480439500010 S0100-69162019000400490.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Engenharia Agricola |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
490-497 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Soc Brasil Engenharia Agricola |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Soc Brasil Engenharia Agricola |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Web of Science reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1834483013892702208 |