Influence of the dental implant number and load direction on stress distribution in a 3-unit implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Silveira, Marcos Paulo Motta [UNESP]
Publication Date: 2021
Other Authors: Campaner, Larissa Mendes [UNESP], Bottino, Marco Antonio [UNESP], Nishioka, Renato Sussumu [UNESP], Borges, Alexandre Luiz Souto [UNESP], Tribst, João Paulo Mendes [UNESP]
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Download full: http://dx.doi.org/10.17219/dmp/130847
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/208586
Summary: Background. The choice between 2 or 3 implants to support a 3-unit implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) still generates doubt in clinical practice. Objectives. The aim of this study was to evaluate stress distribution in 3-unit implant-supported FDPs according to the implant number and load direction. Material and methods. A numerical simulation was performed to analyze stress and strain according to the implant number (2 or 3) and load direction (axial or oblique). A model of a jaw was created by means of the modeling software Rhinoceros, v. 5.0 SR8. External hexagon implants, micro-conical abutments and screws were also modeled. The final geometries were exported to the computer-aided engineering (CAE) software Ansys, v. 17.2, and all materials were considered homogeneous, isotropic and elastic. Different load directions were applied for each model (300 N) at the center of the prosthesis. Results. The von Mises stress and strain values were obtained for the titanium structures and the bone, respectively. The implant number influenced the prosthesis biomechanics, with higher stress and strain concentrations when 2 implants were simulated. The oblique load also affected the mechanical response, showing higher stress and strain in comparison with the axial load, regardless of the implant number. Conclusions. It was concluded that for a 3-unit implant-supported FDP, a greater number of implants associated with axial loads can result in a better mechanical response during chewing.
id UNSP_c2d76c5a3d9cc2328f02932a67d1c9d0
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/208586
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Influence of the dental implant number and load direction on stress distribution in a 3-unit implant-supported fixed dental prosthesisBiomechanicsDental implantsFinite element analysisFixed denturesStress distributionBackground. The choice between 2 or 3 implants to support a 3-unit implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) still generates doubt in clinical practice. Objectives. The aim of this study was to evaluate stress distribution in 3-unit implant-supported FDPs according to the implant number and load direction. Material and methods. A numerical simulation was performed to analyze stress and strain according to the implant number (2 or 3) and load direction (axial or oblique). A model of a jaw was created by means of the modeling software Rhinoceros, v. 5.0 SR8. External hexagon implants, micro-conical abutments and screws were also modeled. The final geometries were exported to the computer-aided engineering (CAE) software Ansys, v. 17.2, and all materials were considered homogeneous, isotropic and elastic. Different load directions were applied for each model (300 N) at the center of the prosthesis. Results. The von Mises stress and strain values were obtained for the titanium structures and the bone, respectively. The implant number influenced the prosthesis biomechanics, with higher stress and strain concentrations when 2 implants were simulated. The oblique load also affected the mechanical response, showing higher stress and strain in comparison with the axial load, regardless of the implant number. Conclusions. It was concluded that for a 3-unit implant-supported FDP, a greater number of implants associated with axial loads can result in a better mechanical response during chewing.Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University (UNESP)Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University (UNESP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Silveira, Marcos Paulo Motta [UNESP]Campaner, Larissa Mendes [UNESP]Bottino, Marco Antonio [UNESP]Nishioka, Renato Sussumu [UNESP]Borges, Alexandre Luiz Souto [UNESP]Tribst, João Paulo Mendes [UNESP]2021-06-25T11:14:37Z2021-06-25T11:14:37Z2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article69-74http://dx.doi.org/10.17219/dmp/130847Dental and Medical Problems, v. 58, n. 1, p. 69-74, 2021.2300-90201644-387Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/20858610.17219/dmp/1308472-s2.0-85104209916Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengDental and Medical Problemsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-11-18T13:34:34Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/208586Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-11-18T13:34:34Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Influence of the dental implant number and load direction on stress distribution in a 3-unit implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis
title Influence of the dental implant number and load direction on stress distribution in a 3-unit implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis
spellingShingle Influence of the dental implant number and load direction on stress distribution in a 3-unit implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis
Silveira, Marcos Paulo Motta [UNESP]
Biomechanics
Dental implants
Finite element analysis
Fixed dentures
Stress distribution
title_short Influence of the dental implant number and load direction on stress distribution in a 3-unit implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis
title_full Influence of the dental implant number and load direction on stress distribution in a 3-unit implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis
title_fullStr Influence of the dental implant number and load direction on stress distribution in a 3-unit implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis
title_full_unstemmed Influence of the dental implant number and load direction on stress distribution in a 3-unit implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis
title_sort Influence of the dental implant number and load direction on stress distribution in a 3-unit implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis
author Silveira, Marcos Paulo Motta [UNESP]
author_facet Silveira, Marcos Paulo Motta [UNESP]
Campaner, Larissa Mendes [UNESP]
Bottino, Marco Antonio [UNESP]
Nishioka, Renato Sussumu [UNESP]
Borges, Alexandre Luiz Souto [UNESP]
Tribst, João Paulo Mendes [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Campaner, Larissa Mendes [UNESP]
Bottino, Marco Antonio [UNESP]
Nishioka, Renato Sussumu [UNESP]
Borges, Alexandre Luiz Souto [UNESP]
Tribst, João Paulo Mendes [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silveira, Marcos Paulo Motta [UNESP]
Campaner, Larissa Mendes [UNESP]
Bottino, Marco Antonio [UNESP]
Nishioka, Renato Sussumu [UNESP]
Borges, Alexandre Luiz Souto [UNESP]
Tribst, João Paulo Mendes [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Biomechanics
Dental implants
Finite element analysis
Fixed dentures
Stress distribution
topic Biomechanics
Dental implants
Finite element analysis
Fixed dentures
Stress distribution
description Background. The choice between 2 or 3 implants to support a 3-unit implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) still generates doubt in clinical practice. Objectives. The aim of this study was to evaluate stress distribution in 3-unit implant-supported FDPs according to the implant number and load direction. Material and methods. A numerical simulation was performed to analyze stress and strain according to the implant number (2 or 3) and load direction (axial or oblique). A model of a jaw was created by means of the modeling software Rhinoceros, v. 5.0 SR8. External hexagon implants, micro-conical abutments and screws were also modeled. The final geometries were exported to the computer-aided engineering (CAE) software Ansys, v. 17.2, and all materials were considered homogeneous, isotropic and elastic. Different load directions were applied for each model (300 N) at the center of the prosthesis. Results. The von Mises stress and strain values were obtained for the titanium structures and the bone, respectively. The implant number influenced the prosthesis biomechanics, with higher stress and strain concentrations when 2 implants were simulated. The oblique load also affected the mechanical response, showing higher stress and strain in comparison with the axial load, regardless of the implant number. Conclusions. It was concluded that for a 3-unit implant-supported FDP, a greater number of implants associated with axial loads can result in a better mechanical response during chewing.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-25T11:14:37Z
2021-06-25T11:14:37Z
2021-01-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.17219/dmp/130847
Dental and Medical Problems, v. 58, n. 1, p. 69-74, 2021.
2300-9020
1644-387X
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/208586
10.17219/dmp/130847
2-s2.0-85104209916
url http://dx.doi.org/10.17219/dmp/130847
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/208586
identifier_str_mv Dental and Medical Problems, v. 58, n. 1, p. 69-74, 2021.
2300-9020
1644-387X
10.17219/dmp/130847
2-s2.0-85104209916
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Dental and Medical Problems
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 69-74
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1834484669337305088