Exportação concluída — 

Assessment of inbreeding coefficients and inbreeding depression on complex traits from genomic and pedigree data in Nelore cattle

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mota, Lucio F. M. [UNESP]
Publication Date: 2024
Other Authors: Carvajal, Alejandro B. [UNESP], Silva Neto, João B. [UNESP], Díaz, Clara, Carabaño, Maria J., Baldi, Fernando [UNESP], Munari, Danísio P. [UNESP]
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Download full: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-024-10842-w
https://hdl.handle.net/11449/299440
Summary: Background: Nelore cattle play a key role in tropical production systems due to their resilience to harsh conditions, such as heat stress and seasonally poor nutrition. Monitoring their genetic diversity is essential to manage the negative impacts of inbreeding. Traditionally, inbreeding and inbreeding depression are assessed by pedigree-based coefficients (F), but recently, genetic markers have been preferred for their precision in capturing the inbreeding level and identifying animals at risk of reduced productive and reproductive performance. Hence, we compared the inbreeding and inbreeding depression for productive and reproductive performance traits in Nelore cattle using different inbreeding coefficient estimation methods from pedigree information (FPed), the genomic relationship matrix (FGRM), runs of homozygosity (FROH) of different lengths (> 1 Mb (genome), between 1 and 2 Mb - FROH 1−2; 2–4 Mb FROH 2−4 or > 8 Mb FROH >8) and excess homozygosity (FSNP). Results: The correlation between FPed and FROH was lower when the latter was based on shorter segments (r = 0.15 with FROH 1−2, r = 0.20 with FROH 2−4 and r = 0.28 with FROH 4−8). Meanwhile, the FPed had a moderate correlation with FSNP (r = 0.47) and high correlation with FROH >8 (r = 0.58) and FROH−genome (r = 0.60). The FROH−genome was highly correlated with inbreeding based on FROH>8 (r = 0.93) and FSNP (r = 0.88). The FGRM exhibited a high correlation with FROH−genome (r = 0.55) and FROH >8 (r = 0.51) and a lower correlation with other inbreeding estimators varying from 0.30 for FROH 2−4 to 0.37 for FROH 1−2. Increased levels of inbreeding had a negative impact on the productive and reproductive performance of Nelore cattle. The unfavorable inbreeding effect on productive and reproductive traits ranged from 0.12 to 0.51 for FPed, 0.19–0.59 for FGRM, 0.21–0.58 for FROH−genome, and 0.19–0.54 for FSNP per 1% of inbreeding scaled on the percentage of the mean. When scaling the linear regression coefficients on the standard deviation, the unfavorable inbreeding effect varied from 0.43 to 1.56% for FPed, 0.49–1.97% for FGRM, 0.34–2.2% for FROH−genome, and 0.50–1.62% for FSNP per 1% of inbreeding. The impact of the homozygous segments on reproductive and performance traits varied based on the chromosomes. This shows that specific homozygous chromosome segments can be signs of positive selection due to their beneficial effects on the traits. Conclusions: The low correlation observed between FPed and genomic-based inbreeding estimates suggests that the presence of animals with one unknown parent (sire or dam) in the pedigree does not account for ancient inbreeding. The ROH hotspots surround genes related to reproduction, growth, meat quality, and adaptation to environmental stress. Inbreeding depression has adverse effects on productive and reproductive traits in Nelore cattle, particularly on age at puberty in young bulls and heifer calving at 30 months, as well as on scrotal circumference and body weight when scaled on the standard deviation of the trait.
id UNSP_a9cf9d99ca4cdb3181f33c6098bba8cb
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/299440
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Assessment of inbreeding coefficients and inbreeding depression on complex traits from genomic and pedigree data in Nelore cattleGene ontologyInbreeding coefficientsInbreeding depressionProductive traitsReproductive traitsROH islandsBackground: Nelore cattle play a key role in tropical production systems due to their resilience to harsh conditions, such as heat stress and seasonally poor nutrition. Monitoring their genetic diversity is essential to manage the negative impacts of inbreeding. Traditionally, inbreeding and inbreeding depression are assessed by pedigree-based coefficients (F), but recently, genetic markers have been preferred for their precision in capturing the inbreeding level and identifying animals at risk of reduced productive and reproductive performance. Hence, we compared the inbreeding and inbreeding depression for productive and reproductive performance traits in Nelore cattle using different inbreeding coefficient estimation methods from pedigree information (FPed), the genomic relationship matrix (FGRM), runs of homozygosity (FROH) of different lengths (> 1 Mb (genome), between 1 and 2 Mb - FROH 1−2; 2–4 Mb FROH 2−4 or > 8 Mb FROH >8) and excess homozygosity (FSNP). Results: The correlation between FPed and FROH was lower when the latter was based on shorter segments (r = 0.15 with FROH 1−2, r = 0.20 with FROH 2−4 and r = 0.28 with FROH 4−8). Meanwhile, the FPed had a moderate correlation with FSNP (r = 0.47) and high correlation with FROH >8 (r = 0.58) and FROH−genome (r = 0.60). The FROH−genome was highly correlated with inbreeding based on FROH>8 (r = 0.93) and FSNP (r = 0.88). The FGRM exhibited a high correlation with FROH−genome (r = 0.55) and FROH >8 (r = 0.51) and a lower correlation with other inbreeding estimators varying from 0.30 for FROH 2−4 to 0.37 for FROH 1−2. Increased levels of inbreeding had a negative impact on the productive and reproductive performance of Nelore cattle. The unfavorable inbreeding effect on productive and reproductive traits ranged from 0.12 to 0.51 for FPed, 0.19–0.59 for FGRM, 0.21–0.58 for FROH−genome, and 0.19–0.54 for FSNP per 1% of inbreeding scaled on the percentage of the mean. When scaling the linear regression coefficients on the standard deviation, the unfavorable inbreeding effect varied from 0.43 to 1.56% for FPed, 0.49–1.97% for FGRM, 0.34–2.2% for FROH−genome, and 0.50–1.62% for FSNP per 1% of inbreeding. The impact of the homozygous segments on reproductive and performance traits varied based on the chromosomes. This shows that specific homozygous chromosome segments can be signs of positive selection due to their beneficial effects on the traits. Conclusions: The low correlation observed between FPed and genomic-based inbreeding estimates suggests that the presence of animals with one unknown parent (sire or dam) in the pedigree does not account for ancient inbreeding. The ROH hotspots surround genes related to reproduction, growth, meat quality, and adaptation to environmental stress. Inbreeding depression has adverse effects on productive and reproductive traits in Nelore cattle, particularly on age at puberty in young bulls and heifer calving at 30 months, as well as on scrotal circumference and body weight when scaled on the standard deviation of the trait.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences São Paulo State University (UNESP), Via de Acesso Prof. Paulo Donato Castelane, SPInstituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA-C SIC)National Association of Breeders and Researchers, Rua João Godoy 463, SPNational Council for Science and Technological Development (CNPq), DFSchool of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences São Paulo State University (UNESP), Via de Acesso Prof. Paulo Donato Castelane, SPUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA-C SIC)National Association of Breeders and ResearchersNational Council for Science and Technological Development (CNPq)Mota, Lucio F. M. [UNESP]Carvajal, Alejandro B. [UNESP]Silva Neto, João B. [UNESP]Díaz, ClaraCarabaño, Maria J.Baldi, Fernando [UNESP]Munari, Danísio P. [UNESP]2025-04-29T18:42:24Z2024-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-024-10842-wBMC Genomics, v. 25, n. 1, 2024.1471-2164https://hdl.handle.net/11449/29944010.1186/s12864-024-10842-w2-s2.0-85205943348Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengBMC Genomicsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2025-04-30T13:24:42Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/299440Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462025-04-30T13:24:42Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Assessment of inbreeding coefficients and inbreeding depression on complex traits from genomic and pedigree data in Nelore cattle
title Assessment of inbreeding coefficients and inbreeding depression on complex traits from genomic and pedigree data in Nelore cattle
spellingShingle Assessment of inbreeding coefficients and inbreeding depression on complex traits from genomic and pedigree data in Nelore cattle
Mota, Lucio F. M. [UNESP]
Gene ontology
Inbreeding coefficients
Inbreeding depression
Productive traits
Reproductive traits
ROH islands
title_short Assessment of inbreeding coefficients and inbreeding depression on complex traits from genomic and pedigree data in Nelore cattle
title_full Assessment of inbreeding coefficients and inbreeding depression on complex traits from genomic and pedigree data in Nelore cattle
title_fullStr Assessment of inbreeding coefficients and inbreeding depression on complex traits from genomic and pedigree data in Nelore cattle
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of inbreeding coefficients and inbreeding depression on complex traits from genomic and pedigree data in Nelore cattle
title_sort Assessment of inbreeding coefficients and inbreeding depression on complex traits from genomic and pedigree data in Nelore cattle
author Mota, Lucio F. M. [UNESP]
author_facet Mota, Lucio F. M. [UNESP]
Carvajal, Alejandro B. [UNESP]
Silva Neto, João B. [UNESP]
Díaz, Clara
Carabaño, Maria J.
Baldi, Fernando [UNESP]
Munari, Danísio P. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Carvajal, Alejandro B. [UNESP]
Silva Neto, João B. [UNESP]
Díaz, Clara
Carabaño, Maria J.
Baldi, Fernando [UNESP]
Munari, Danísio P. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA-C SIC)
National Association of Breeders and Researchers
National Council for Science and Technological Development (CNPq)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mota, Lucio F. M. [UNESP]
Carvajal, Alejandro B. [UNESP]
Silva Neto, João B. [UNESP]
Díaz, Clara
Carabaño, Maria J.
Baldi, Fernando [UNESP]
Munari, Danísio P. [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Gene ontology
Inbreeding coefficients
Inbreeding depression
Productive traits
Reproductive traits
ROH islands
topic Gene ontology
Inbreeding coefficients
Inbreeding depression
Productive traits
Reproductive traits
ROH islands
description Background: Nelore cattle play a key role in tropical production systems due to their resilience to harsh conditions, such as heat stress and seasonally poor nutrition. Monitoring their genetic diversity is essential to manage the negative impacts of inbreeding. Traditionally, inbreeding and inbreeding depression are assessed by pedigree-based coefficients (F), but recently, genetic markers have been preferred for their precision in capturing the inbreeding level and identifying animals at risk of reduced productive and reproductive performance. Hence, we compared the inbreeding and inbreeding depression for productive and reproductive performance traits in Nelore cattle using different inbreeding coefficient estimation methods from pedigree information (FPed), the genomic relationship matrix (FGRM), runs of homozygosity (FROH) of different lengths (> 1 Mb (genome), between 1 and 2 Mb - FROH 1−2; 2–4 Mb FROH 2−4 or > 8 Mb FROH >8) and excess homozygosity (FSNP). Results: The correlation between FPed and FROH was lower when the latter was based on shorter segments (r = 0.15 with FROH 1−2, r = 0.20 with FROH 2−4 and r = 0.28 with FROH 4−8). Meanwhile, the FPed had a moderate correlation with FSNP (r = 0.47) and high correlation with FROH >8 (r = 0.58) and FROH−genome (r = 0.60). The FROH−genome was highly correlated with inbreeding based on FROH>8 (r = 0.93) and FSNP (r = 0.88). The FGRM exhibited a high correlation with FROH−genome (r = 0.55) and FROH >8 (r = 0.51) and a lower correlation with other inbreeding estimators varying from 0.30 for FROH 2−4 to 0.37 for FROH 1−2. Increased levels of inbreeding had a negative impact on the productive and reproductive performance of Nelore cattle. The unfavorable inbreeding effect on productive and reproductive traits ranged from 0.12 to 0.51 for FPed, 0.19–0.59 for FGRM, 0.21–0.58 for FROH−genome, and 0.19–0.54 for FSNP per 1% of inbreeding scaled on the percentage of the mean. When scaling the linear regression coefficients on the standard deviation, the unfavorable inbreeding effect varied from 0.43 to 1.56% for FPed, 0.49–1.97% for FGRM, 0.34–2.2% for FROH−genome, and 0.50–1.62% for FSNP per 1% of inbreeding. The impact of the homozygous segments on reproductive and performance traits varied based on the chromosomes. This shows that specific homozygous chromosome segments can be signs of positive selection due to their beneficial effects on the traits. Conclusions: The low correlation observed between FPed and genomic-based inbreeding estimates suggests that the presence of animals with one unknown parent (sire or dam) in the pedigree does not account for ancient inbreeding. The ROH hotspots surround genes related to reproduction, growth, meat quality, and adaptation to environmental stress. Inbreeding depression has adverse effects on productive and reproductive traits in Nelore cattle, particularly on age at puberty in young bulls and heifer calving at 30 months, as well as on scrotal circumference and body weight when scaled on the standard deviation of the trait.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-12-01
2025-04-29T18:42:24Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-024-10842-w
BMC Genomics, v. 25, n. 1, 2024.
1471-2164
https://hdl.handle.net/11449/299440
10.1186/s12864-024-10842-w
2-s2.0-85205943348
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-024-10842-w
https://hdl.handle.net/11449/299440
identifier_str_mv BMC Genomics, v. 25, n. 1, 2024.
1471-2164
10.1186/s12864-024-10842-w
2-s2.0-85205943348
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv BMC Genomics
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1834482695601651712