Genetic and genomic evaluation for resistance to white spot syndrome virus in post-larvae of Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei)

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Campos-Montes, Gabriel R.
Publication Date: 2023
Other Authors: Garcia, Baltasar F., Medrano-Mendoza, Thania, Caballero-Zamora, Alejandra, Montoya-Rodríguez, Leobardo, Quintana-Casares, Juan C., Yáñez, José M.
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Download full: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2023.739745
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/247540
Summary: The objective of the present study was to compare genetic evaluations with pedigree- and genomic-based for the time of death of post-inoculation (TD) and survival considered as a binary variable (1 = survivor, 0 = dead) (BS) to white spot syndrome obtained in a controlled experimental challenge. In seven tanks were seed a total 6132 shrimps, of which the genotypes of 1685 were obtained using a commercial 50 K SNP panel. A total of 176 families were formed from a Sire: Dam ratio of 1:2. In the challenge test, the organisms were inoculated per os with macerated shrimp tissue with a viral load of 1 × 106 copies/g of tissue. The inoculum was supplied in two doses (first of 6% and second of 4% of the biomass in each tank) whit 12 h of difference. Four approaches were used for estimating variance components and calculating genetic or genomic estimated breeding values: 1) PBLUP-1 is an animal model fitted using a pedigree-based kinship matrix using only parent-progeny relationships from individuals from the latest generation; 2) PBLUP-All is the same as above but using the genealogy from 19 generations; 3) GBLUP is an animal model fitted using a genomic-based relationship matrix including genotyped animals only, and 4) ssGBLUP is an animal model fitted using a blend between the pedigree and genomic relationship matrix. The heritability values obtained for TD and BS with the four approaches ranged from 0.072 to 0.105 and 0.069 to 0.095, respectively. The heritability estimators obtained with genomic information were slightly higher than those obtained with only pedigree information. PBLUP-All and ssGBLUP present proportionally lower standard errors than PBLUP-1 and GBLUP. The use of genomic information (GBLUP and ssGBLUP) increased the mean accuracy of estimated breeding values by an average of 38% and 54% concerning methods that only used phenotypic information (PBLUP-1 and PBLUP-ALL). Using a 50 K SNP genotyping panel and deep pedigree information increased heritability estimation of traits associated with resistance to white spot syndrome virus in Pacific white shrimp. Using genomic information substantially improves the accuracy of estimated breeding values when using ssGBLUP compared to pedigree-based methods. Genomic selection will allow individual selection within-family by predicting the genetic values of animals not exposed to the white spot syndrome virus.
id UNSP_8b72ea834a299ad8b3de0befc673b785
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/247540
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Genetic and genomic evaluation for resistance to white spot syndrome virus in post-larvae of Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei)Accuracy of predictionGenomic evaluationShrimpWhite spot syndromeThe objective of the present study was to compare genetic evaluations with pedigree- and genomic-based for the time of death of post-inoculation (TD) and survival considered as a binary variable (1 = survivor, 0 = dead) (BS) to white spot syndrome obtained in a controlled experimental challenge. In seven tanks were seed a total 6132 shrimps, of which the genotypes of 1685 were obtained using a commercial 50 K SNP panel. A total of 176 families were formed from a Sire: Dam ratio of 1:2. In the challenge test, the organisms were inoculated per os with macerated shrimp tissue with a viral load of 1 × 106 copies/g of tissue. The inoculum was supplied in two doses (first of 6% and second of 4% of the biomass in each tank) whit 12 h of difference. Four approaches were used for estimating variance components and calculating genetic or genomic estimated breeding values: 1) PBLUP-1 is an animal model fitted using a pedigree-based kinship matrix using only parent-progeny relationships from individuals from the latest generation; 2) PBLUP-All is the same as above but using the genealogy from 19 generations; 3) GBLUP is an animal model fitted using a genomic-based relationship matrix including genotyped animals only, and 4) ssGBLUP is an animal model fitted using a blend between the pedigree and genomic relationship matrix. The heritability values obtained for TD and BS with the four approaches ranged from 0.072 to 0.105 and 0.069 to 0.095, respectively. The heritability estimators obtained with genomic information were slightly higher than those obtained with only pedigree information. PBLUP-All and ssGBLUP present proportionally lower standard errors than PBLUP-1 and GBLUP. The use of genomic information (GBLUP and ssGBLUP) increased the mean accuracy of estimated breeding values by an average of 38% and 54% concerning methods that only used phenotypic information (PBLUP-1 and PBLUP-ALL). Using a 50 K SNP genotyping panel and deep pedigree information increased heritability estimation of traits associated with resistance to white spot syndrome virus in Pacific white shrimp. Using genomic information substantially improves the accuracy of estimated breeding values when using ssGBLUP compared to pedigree-based methods. Genomic selection will allow individual selection within-family by predicting the genetic values of animals not exposed to the white spot syndrome virus.Departamento de El Hombre y su Ambiente Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana Unidad Xochimilco, Calzada del Hueso 1100, CDMXFacultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia Universidad Estatal Paulista Universidad del Estado de São PauloFacultad de Ciencias Veterinarias y Pecuarias Universidad de ChileUniversidad Autónoma Metropolitana Unidad Xochimilco, Calzada del Hueso 1100, CDMXDepartamento de Producción Agrícola y Animal Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana Unidad Xochimilco, Calzada del Hueso 1100, CDMXCentro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrolllo A.C., Av. Sábalo Cerritoss/n, Colonia Cerritos, SinaloaMaricultura del Pacífico S.A. de C.V., Av. Dr. Carlos Canseco 5994, Colonia El Cid, SinaloaUnidad XochimilcoUniversidad del Estado de São PauloUniversidad de ChileCentro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrolllo A.C.Maricultura del Pacífico S.A. de C.V.Campos-Montes, Gabriel R.Garcia, Baltasar F.Medrano-Mendoza, ThaniaCaballero-Zamora, AlejandraMontoya-Rodríguez, LeobardoQuintana-Casares, Juan C.Yáñez, José M.2023-07-29T13:18:53Z2023-07-29T13:18:53Z2023-10-15info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2023.739745Aquaculture, v. 575.0044-8486http://hdl.handle.net/11449/24754010.1016/j.aquaculture.2023.7397452-s2.0-85161303529Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengAquacultureinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-07-29T13:18:53Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/247540Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462023-07-29T13:18:53Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Genetic and genomic evaluation for resistance to white spot syndrome virus in post-larvae of Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei)
title Genetic and genomic evaluation for resistance to white spot syndrome virus in post-larvae of Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei)
spellingShingle Genetic and genomic evaluation for resistance to white spot syndrome virus in post-larvae of Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei)
Campos-Montes, Gabriel R.
Accuracy of prediction
Genomic evaluation
Shrimp
White spot syndrome
title_short Genetic and genomic evaluation for resistance to white spot syndrome virus in post-larvae of Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei)
title_full Genetic and genomic evaluation for resistance to white spot syndrome virus in post-larvae of Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei)
title_fullStr Genetic and genomic evaluation for resistance to white spot syndrome virus in post-larvae of Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei)
title_full_unstemmed Genetic and genomic evaluation for resistance to white spot syndrome virus in post-larvae of Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei)
title_sort Genetic and genomic evaluation for resistance to white spot syndrome virus in post-larvae of Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei)
author Campos-Montes, Gabriel R.
author_facet Campos-Montes, Gabriel R.
Garcia, Baltasar F.
Medrano-Mendoza, Thania
Caballero-Zamora, Alejandra
Montoya-Rodríguez, Leobardo
Quintana-Casares, Juan C.
Yáñez, José M.
author_role author
author2 Garcia, Baltasar F.
Medrano-Mendoza, Thania
Caballero-Zamora, Alejandra
Montoya-Rodríguez, Leobardo
Quintana-Casares, Juan C.
Yáñez, José M.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Unidad Xochimilco
Universidad del Estado de São Paulo
Universidad de Chile
Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrolllo A.C.
Maricultura del Pacífico S.A. de C.V.
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Campos-Montes, Gabriel R.
Garcia, Baltasar F.
Medrano-Mendoza, Thania
Caballero-Zamora, Alejandra
Montoya-Rodríguez, Leobardo
Quintana-Casares, Juan C.
Yáñez, José M.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Accuracy of prediction
Genomic evaluation
Shrimp
White spot syndrome
topic Accuracy of prediction
Genomic evaluation
Shrimp
White spot syndrome
description The objective of the present study was to compare genetic evaluations with pedigree- and genomic-based for the time of death of post-inoculation (TD) and survival considered as a binary variable (1 = survivor, 0 = dead) (BS) to white spot syndrome obtained in a controlled experimental challenge. In seven tanks were seed a total 6132 shrimps, of which the genotypes of 1685 were obtained using a commercial 50 K SNP panel. A total of 176 families were formed from a Sire: Dam ratio of 1:2. In the challenge test, the organisms were inoculated per os with macerated shrimp tissue with a viral load of 1 × 106 copies/g of tissue. The inoculum was supplied in two doses (first of 6% and second of 4% of the biomass in each tank) whit 12 h of difference. Four approaches were used for estimating variance components and calculating genetic or genomic estimated breeding values: 1) PBLUP-1 is an animal model fitted using a pedigree-based kinship matrix using only parent-progeny relationships from individuals from the latest generation; 2) PBLUP-All is the same as above but using the genealogy from 19 generations; 3) GBLUP is an animal model fitted using a genomic-based relationship matrix including genotyped animals only, and 4) ssGBLUP is an animal model fitted using a blend between the pedigree and genomic relationship matrix. The heritability values obtained for TD and BS with the four approaches ranged from 0.072 to 0.105 and 0.069 to 0.095, respectively. The heritability estimators obtained with genomic information were slightly higher than those obtained with only pedigree information. PBLUP-All and ssGBLUP present proportionally lower standard errors than PBLUP-1 and GBLUP. The use of genomic information (GBLUP and ssGBLUP) increased the mean accuracy of estimated breeding values by an average of 38% and 54% concerning methods that only used phenotypic information (PBLUP-1 and PBLUP-ALL). Using a 50 K SNP genotyping panel and deep pedigree information increased heritability estimation of traits associated with resistance to white spot syndrome virus in Pacific white shrimp. Using genomic information substantially improves the accuracy of estimated breeding values when using ssGBLUP compared to pedigree-based methods. Genomic selection will allow individual selection within-family by predicting the genetic values of animals not exposed to the white spot syndrome virus.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-07-29T13:18:53Z
2023-07-29T13:18:53Z
2023-10-15
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2023.739745
Aquaculture, v. 575.
0044-8486
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/247540
10.1016/j.aquaculture.2023.739745
2-s2.0-85161303529
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2023.739745
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/247540
identifier_str_mv Aquaculture, v. 575.
0044-8486
10.1016/j.aquaculture.2023.739745
2-s2.0-85161303529
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Aquaculture
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1834483308484886528