Periodized Training in Mice: Comparisons between Constant and Undulating Load Models
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2020 |
Other Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Download full: | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/207930 |
Summary: | Carvalho CD, Kalva-Filho CA, Milioni F, Loures JP, Serrano VS, Silva ASR, Papoti M. Periodized Training in Mice: Comparisons between Constant and Undulating Load Models. JEPonline 2020;23(4):15-24. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of undulating (UL) and constant load (CL) training models applied in Swiss mice. Twenty male mice were divided into 3 groups: (a) Control Group [CON; n=6]; (b) Undulating Group [ULG; n=7]; and (c) Constant Load Group [CLG; n=7]. Both training periods lasted 8 wks, 5 d∙wk-1, as prescribed in accordance with maximal speed reached during the incremental test (MaxS). The ULG trained through sessions classified as Endurance 1 (60 min at 40% MaxS), Endurance 2 (30 min at 60% MaxS), Endurance 3 (4 x 5 min at 100% MaxS), and Anaerobic (10 x 1 min at 120% MaxS). All sessions for CLG consisted of a 60-min duration at 60% of MaxS. Both training models induced positive adaptations until the 4th wk of training. However, these adaptations were not maintained during the last 4 wks, declining MaxS in relation to baseline. The CLG was able to accomplish only 69% of proposed training volume. However, the ULG was able to accomplish 94% of the proposed volume. Comparing the reasons for sessions failure, CLG presented higher number of dropouts related to unsatisfactory running (P-value = 0.008) and exhaustion (P-value = 0.001), while the ULG quit the sessions mainly due to injuries (P-value = 0.003). These results demonstrate that independently of the training model used, positive adaptations were induced up to the 4th-wk of training with high intensity sessions producing the larger amount of dropouts due primarily to injuries. |
id |
UNSP_72e8e9e01c7a373f46ed0c870522ac17 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/207930 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Periodized Training in Mice: Comparisons between Constant and Undulating Load ModelsAerobic TrainingMaximal SpeedMiceRunningCarvalho CD, Kalva-Filho CA, Milioni F, Loures JP, Serrano VS, Silva ASR, Papoti M. Periodized Training in Mice: Comparisons between Constant and Undulating Load Models. JEPonline 2020;23(4):15-24. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of undulating (UL) and constant load (CL) training models applied in Swiss mice. Twenty male mice were divided into 3 groups: (a) Control Group [CON; n=6]; (b) Undulating Group [ULG; n=7]; and (c) Constant Load Group [CLG; n=7]. Both training periods lasted 8 wks, 5 d∙wk-1, as prescribed in accordance with maximal speed reached during the incremental test (MaxS). The ULG trained through sessions classified as Endurance 1 (60 min at 40% MaxS), Endurance 2 (30 min at 60% MaxS), Endurance 3 (4 x 5 min at 100% MaxS), and Anaerobic (10 x 1 min at 120% MaxS). All sessions for CLG consisted of a 60-min duration at 60% of MaxS. Both training models induced positive adaptations until the 4th wk of training. However, these adaptations were not maintained during the last 4 wks, declining MaxS in relation to baseline. The CLG was able to accomplish only 69% of proposed training volume. However, the ULG was able to accomplish 94% of the proposed volume. Comparing the reasons for sessions failure, CLG presented higher number of dropouts related to unsatisfactory running (P-value = 0.008) and exhaustion (P-value = 0.001), while the ULG quit the sessions mainly due to injuries (P-value = 0.003). These results demonstrate that independently of the training model used, positive adaptations were induced up to the 4th-wk of training with high intensity sessions producing the larger amount of dropouts due primarily to injuries.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)School of Physical Education and Sport of Ribeirão Preto University of São PauloPhysical Education School of Sciences São Paulo State University (Unesp)Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation and Functional Performance Ribeirão Preto Medical School University of São Paulo (USP)Physical Education School of Sciences São Paulo State University (Unesp)FAPESP: FAPESP/n◦2014/19627-6Universidade de São Paulo (USP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)de Carvalho, Carlos DellavechiaKalva-Filho, Carlos Augusto [UNESP]Milioni, Fabio [UNESP]Loures, João PauloSerrano, Vitor SiqueiraSilva, Adelino Sanchez RamosPapoti, Marcelo2021-06-25T11:03:25Z2021-06-25T11:03:25Z2020-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article15-24Journal of Exercise Physiology Online, v. 23, n. 4, p. 15-24, 2020.1097-9751http://hdl.handle.net/11449/2079302-s2.0-85104089288Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Exercise Physiology Onlineinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-08-14T17:23:43Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/207930Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-08-14T17:23:43Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Periodized Training in Mice: Comparisons between Constant and Undulating Load Models |
title |
Periodized Training in Mice: Comparisons between Constant and Undulating Load Models |
spellingShingle |
Periodized Training in Mice: Comparisons between Constant and Undulating Load Models de Carvalho, Carlos Dellavechia Aerobic Training Maximal Speed Mice Running |
title_short |
Periodized Training in Mice: Comparisons between Constant and Undulating Load Models |
title_full |
Periodized Training in Mice: Comparisons between Constant and Undulating Load Models |
title_fullStr |
Periodized Training in Mice: Comparisons between Constant and Undulating Load Models |
title_full_unstemmed |
Periodized Training in Mice: Comparisons between Constant and Undulating Load Models |
title_sort |
Periodized Training in Mice: Comparisons between Constant and Undulating Load Models |
author |
de Carvalho, Carlos Dellavechia |
author_facet |
de Carvalho, Carlos Dellavechia Kalva-Filho, Carlos Augusto [UNESP] Milioni, Fabio [UNESP] Loures, João Paulo Serrano, Vitor Siqueira Silva, Adelino Sanchez Ramos Papoti, Marcelo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Kalva-Filho, Carlos Augusto [UNESP] Milioni, Fabio [UNESP] Loures, João Paulo Serrano, Vitor Siqueira Silva, Adelino Sanchez Ramos Papoti, Marcelo |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
de Carvalho, Carlos Dellavechia Kalva-Filho, Carlos Augusto [UNESP] Milioni, Fabio [UNESP] Loures, João Paulo Serrano, Vitor Siqueira Silva, Adelino Sanchez Ramos Papoti, Marcelo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Aerobic Training Maximal Speed Mice Running |
topic |
Aerobic Training Maximal Speed Mice Running |
description |
Carvalho CD, Kalva-Filho CA, Milioni F, Loures JP, Serrano VS, Silva ASR, Papoti M. Periodized Training in Mice: Comparisons between Constant and Undulating Load Models. JEPonline 2020;23(4):15-24. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of undulating (UL) and constant load (CL) training models applied in Swiss mice. Twenty male mice were divided into 3 groups: (a) Control Group [CON; n=6]; (b) Undulating Group [ULG; n=7]; and (c) Constant Load Group [CLG; n=7]. Both training periods lasted 8 wks, 5 d∙wk-1, as prescribed in accordance with maximal speed reached during the incremental test (MaxS). The ULG trained through sessions classified as Endurance 1 (60 min at 40% MaxS), Endurance 2 (30 min at 60% MaxS), Endurance 3 (4 x 5 min at 100% MaxS), and Anaerobic (10 x 1 min at 120% MaxS). All sessions for CLG consisted of a 60-min duration at 60% of MaxS. Both training models induced positive adaptations until the 4th wk of training. However, these adaptations were not maintained during the last 4 wks, declining MaxS in relation to baseline. The CLG was able to accomplish only 69% of proposed training volume. However, the ULG was able to accomplish 94% of the proposed volume. Comparing the reasons for sessions failure, CLG presented higher number of dropouts related to unsatisfactory running (P-value = 0.008) and exhaustion (P-value = 0.001), while the ULG quit the sessions mainly due to injuries (P-value = 0.003). These results demonstrate that independently of the training model used, positive adaptations were induced up to the 4th-wk of training with high intensity sessions producing the larger amount of dropouts due primarily to injuries. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-08-01 2021-06-25T11:03:25Z 2021-06-25T11:03:25Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Exercise Physiology Online, v. 23, n. 4, p. 15-24, 2020. 1097-9751 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/207930 2-s2.0-85104089288 |
identifier_str_mv |
Journal of Exercise Physiology Online, v. 23, n. 4, p. 15-24, 2020. 1097-9751 2-s2.0-85104089288 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/207930 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Exercise Physiology Online |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
15-24 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1834484516936220672 |