Exportação concluída — 

Epiphyte-phorophyte relationships: assessing the differences between Seasonal Semideciduous and Swamp Forests in Southeastern Brazil1

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Marcusso, Gabriel Mendes
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Kamimura, Vitor De Andrade, Monteiro, Reinaldo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2236-8906-23/2018
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/183837
Resumo: ABSTRACT Vascular epiphytes are responsible for a considerable portion of tropical biodiversity; however, the variation of epiphytes-phorophytes relationships in different vegetation types are still poorly understood. In this study, we aimed to assess the presence, abundance, vertical distribution, and life cycle (holoepiphyte and hemiepiphyte) of vascular epiphytes in two vegetation types [Seasonal Semideciduous Forest (- SSF), and Swamp Forest (- SF)] in order to determine any correlation with phorophyte size (diameter and height) and the specificity of phorophyte species to the epiphytic colonization. There was a higher number of phorophytes in SF; however, epiphytes density did not differ between the vegetation types. The recorded vertical distribution also showed different patterns: in the SSF, most epiphytes were found in the canopy, while in the SF they occurred mainly on the trunks of the trees. The abundance of epiphytes was positively correlated with the phorophyte size in the two vegetation types. In the SSF, colonization of phorophytes by epiphytes appeared to be less species-specific than in the SF, where trees density is likely to be a more significant factor to epiphytic colonization. The results showed the importance of the forest heterogeneity in the conservation and maintenance of vascular epiphytes assemblage, demonstrated by differences in the abundance and distribution of the epiphytes, even in contiguous forests.
id UNSP_6bc13d0fe5714742873e67f7daff00f1
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/183837
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Epiphyte-phorophyte relationships: assessing the differences between Seasonal Semideciduous and Swamp Forests in Southeastern Brazil1Relações epífita-forófito: avaliando as diferenças entre florestas estacional semidecidual e paludosa no Sudeste do Brasilatlantic foresthemiepiphytesholoepiphyteshost treevertical distributionárvore hospedeiradistribuição verticalfloresta atlânticahemiepífitasholoepífitasABSTRACT Vascular epiphytes are responsible for a considerable portion of tropical biodiversity; however, the variation of epiphytes-phorophytes relationships in different vegetation types are still poorly understood. In this study, we aimed to assess the presence, abundance, vertical distribution, and life cycle (holoepiphyte and hemiepiphyte) of vascular epiphytes in two vegetation types [Seasonal Semideciduous Forest (- SSF), and Swamp Forest (- SF)] in order to determine any correlation with phorophyte size (diameter and height) and the specificity of phorophyte species to the epiphytic colonization. There was a higher number of phorophytes in SF; however, epiphytes density did not differ between the vegetation types. The recorded vertical distribution also showed different patterns: in the SSF, most epiphytes were found in the canopy, while in the SF they occurred mainly on the trunks of the trees. The abundance of epiphytes was positively correlated with the phorophyte size in the two vegetation types. In the SSF, colonization of phorophytes by epiphytes appeared to be less species-specific than in the SF, where trees density is likely to be a more significant factor to epiphytic colonization. The results showed the importance of the forest heterogeneity in the conservation and maintenance of vascular epiphytes assemblage, demonstrated by differences in the abundance and distribution of the epiphytes, even in contiguous forests.RESUMO As epífitas vasculares são responsáveis por uma parcela considerável da biodiversidade tropical; no entanto, suas relações com os forófitos entre diferentes tipos de vegetação em que ocorrem ainda são pouco compreendidas. Neste trabalho, objetivamos avaliar a presença, a abundância, a distribuição vertical e a categoria ecológica (holoepífita e hemiepífita) das epífitas vasculares em dois tipos de vegetação [Floresta Estacional Semidecídua (- FES) e Floresta Paludosa (- FP)], com o intuito de investigar se há correlação com o tamanho dos forófitos (diâmetro e altura) e possíveis especificidades na colonização destes pelas epífitas. Na FP foi registrado um maior número de forófitos; no entanto, a abundância de epífitas não apresentou diferenças entre os dois tipos de vegetação. A distribuição vertical apresentou diferença entre os tipos de vegetação, com mais epífitas no fuste na FP, enquanto na FES a copa apresentou mais epífitas. Houve relação positiva da abundância de epífitas com o porte dos forófitos em ambas as fitofisionomias. Por outro lado, a densidade das espécies de árvores é provavelmente mais importante na FP para a colonização das epífitas. Os resultados mostraram a importância da heterogeneidade florestal na conservação e manutenção da assembleia de epífitos vasculares, demonstrada pelas diferenças na abundância e distribuição das epífitas, mesmo em florestas contíguas.Universidade Estadual Paulista Instituto de Biologia Departamento de BotânicaUniversidade Estadual Paulista Instituto de Biologia Departamento de BotânicaInstituto de BotânicaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Marcusso, Gabriel MendesKamimura, Vitor De AndradeMonteiro, Reinaldo2019-10-03T17:31:51Z2019-10-03T17:31:51Z2019info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2236-8906-23/2018Hoehnea. Instituto de Botânica, v. 46, n. 2, p. -, 2019.2236-8906http://hdl.handle.net/11449/18383710.1590/2236-8906-23/2018S2236-89062019000200203S2236-89062019000200203.pdfSciELOreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengHoehneainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-10-27T06:11:33Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/183837Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462023-10-27T06:11:33Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Epiphyte-phorophyte relationships: assessing the differences between Seasonal Semideciduous and Swamp Forests in Southeastern Brazil1
Relações epífita-forófito: avaliando as diferenças entre florestas estacional semidecidual e paludosa no Sudeste do Brasil
title Epiphyte-phorophyte relationships: assessing the differences between Seasonal Semideciduous and Swamp Forests in Southeastern Brazil1
spellingShingle Epiphyte-phorophyte relationships: assessing the differences between Seasonal Semideciduous and Swamp Forests in Southeastern Brazil1
Marcusso, Gabriel Mendes
atlantic forest
hemiepiphytes
holoepiphytes
host tree
vertical distribution
árvore hospedeira
distribuição vertical
floresta atlântica
hemiepífitas
holoepífitas
title_short Epiphyte-phorophyte relationships: assessing the differences between Seasonal Semideciduous and Swamp Forests in Southeastern Brazil1
title_full Epiphyte-phorophyte relationships: assessing the differences between Seasonal Semideciduous and Swamp Forests in Southeastern Brazil1
title_fullStr Epiphyte-phorophyte relationships: assessing the differences between Seasonal Semideciduous and Swamp Forests in Southeastern Brazil1
title_full_unstemmed Epiphyte-phorophyte relationships: assessing the differences between Seasonal Semideciduous and Swamp Forests in Southeastern Brazil1
title_sort Epiphyte-phorophyte relationships: assessing the differences between Seasonal Semideciduous and Swamp Forests in Southeastern Brazil1
author Marcusso, Gabriel Mendes
author_facet Marcusso, Gabriel Mendes
Kamimura, Vitor De Andrade
Monteiro, Reinaldo
author_role author
author2 Kamimura, Vitor De Andrade
Monteiro, Reinaldo
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Marcusso, Gabriel Mendes
Kamimura, Vitor De Andrade
Monteiro, Reinaldo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv atlantic forest
hemiepiphytes
holoepiphytes
host tree
vertical distribution
árvore hospedeira
distribuição vertical
floresta atlântica
hemiepífitas
holoepífitas
topic atlantic forest
hemiepiphytes
holoepiphytes
host tree
vertical distribution
árvore hospedeira
distribuição vertical
floresta atlântica
hemiepífitas
holoepífitas
description ABSTRACT Vascular epiphytes are responsible for a considerable portion of tropical biodiversity; however, the variation of epiphytes-phorophytes relationships in different vegetation types are still poorly understood. In this study, we aimed to assess the presence, abundance, vertical distribution, and life cycle (holoepiphyte and hemiepiphyte) of vascular epiphytes in two vegetation types [Seasonal Semideciduous Forest (- SSF), and Swamp Forest (- SF)] in order to determine any correlation with phorophyte size (diameter and height) and the specificity of phorophyte species to the epiphytic colonization. There was a higher number of phorophytes in SF; however, epiphytes density did not differ between the vegetation types. The recorded vertical distribution also showed different patterns: in the SSF, most epiphytes were found in the canopy, while in the SF they occurred mainly on the trunks of the trees. The abundance of epiphytes was positively correlated with the phorophyte size in the two vegetation types. In the SSF, colonization of phorophytes by epiphytes appeared to be less species-specific than in the SF, where trees density is likely to be a more significant factor to epiphytic colonization. The results showed the importance of the forest heterogeneity in the conservation and maintenance of vascular epiphytes assemblage, demonstrated by differences in the abundance and distribution of the epiphytes, even in contiguous forests.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-10-03T17:31:51Z
2019-10-03T17:31:51Z
2019
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2236-8906-23/2018
Hoehnea. Instituto de Botânica, v. 46, n. 2, p. -, 2019.
2236-8906
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/183837
10.1590/2236-8906-23/2018
S2236-89062019000200203
S2236-89062019000200203.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2236-8906-23/2018
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/183837
identifier_str_mv Hoehnea. Instituto de Botânica, v. 46, n. 2, p. -, 2019.
2236-8906
10.1590/2236-8906-23/2018
S2236-89062019000200203
S2236-89062019000200203.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Hoehnea
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv -
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Botânica
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Botânica
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv SciELO
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1834484173499269120