Epiphyte-phorophyte relationships: assessing the differences between Seasonal Semideciduous and Swamp Forests in Southeastern Brazil1
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2236-8906-23/2018 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/183837 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Vascular epiphytes are responsible for a considerable portion of tropical biodiversity; however, the variation of epiphytes-phorophytes relationships in different vegetation types are still poorly understood. In this study, we aimed to assess the presence, abundance, vertical distribution, and life cycle (holoepiphyte and hemiepiphyte) of vascular epiphytes in two vegetation types [Seasonal Semideciduous Forest (- SSF), and Swamp Forest (- SF)] in order to determine any correlation with phorophyte size (diameter and height) and the specificity of phorophyte species to the epiphytic colonization. There was a higher number of phorophytes in SF; however, epiphytes density did not differ between the vegetation types. The recorded vertical distribution also showed different patterns: in the SSF, most epiphytes were found in the canopy, while in the SF they occurred mainly on the trunks of the trees. The abundance of epiphytes was positively correlated with the phorophyte size in the two vegetation types. In the SSF, colonization of phorophytes by epiphytes appeared to be less species-specific than in the SF, where trees density is likely to be a more significant factor to epiphytic colonization. The results showed the importance of the forest heterogeneity in the conservation and maintenance of vascular epiphytes assemblage, demonstrated by differences in the abundance and distribution of the epiphytes, even in contiguous forests. |
id |
UNSP_6bc13d0fe5714742873e67f7daff00f1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/183837 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Epiphyte-phorophyte relationships: assessing the differences between Seasonal Semideciduous and Swamp Forests in Southeastern Brazil1Relações epífita-forófito: avaliando as diferenças entre florestas estacional semidecidual e paludosa no Sudeste do Brasilatlantic foresthemiepiphytesholoepiphyteshost treevertical distributionárvore hospedeiradistribuição verticalfloresta atlânticahemiepífitasholoepífitasABSTRACT Vascular epiphytes are responsible for a considerable portion of tropical biodiversity; however, the variation of epiphytes-phorophytes relationships in different vegetation types are still poorly understood. In this study, we aimed to assess the presence, abundance, vertical distribution, and life cycle (holoepiphyte and hemiepiphyte) of vascular epiphytes in two vegetation types [Seasonal Semideciduous Forest (- SSF), and Swamp Forest (- SF)] in order to determine any correlation with phorophyte size (diameter and height) and the specificity of phorophyte species to the epiphytic colonization. There was a higher number of phorophytes in SF; however, epiphytes density did not differ between the vegetation types. The recorded vertical distribution also showed different patterns: in the SSF, most epiphytes were found in the canopy, while in the SF they occurred mainly on the trunks of the trees. The abundance of epiphytes was positively correlated with the phorophyte size in the two vegetation types. In the SSF, colonization of phorophytes by epiphytes appeared to be less species-specific than in the SF, where trees density is likely to be a more significant factor to epiphytic colonization. The results showed the importance of the forest heterogeneity in the conservation and maintenance of vascular epiphytes assemblage, demonstrated by differences in the abundance and distribution of the epiphytes, even in contiguous forests.RESUMO As epífitas vasculares são responsáveis por uma parcela considerável da biodiversidade tropical; no entanto, suas relações com os forófitos entre diferentes tipos de vegetação em que ocorrem ainda são pouco compreendidas. Neste trabalho, objetivamos avaliar a presença, a abundância, a distribuição vertical e a categoria ecológica (holoepífita e hemiepífita) das epífitas vasculares em dois tipos de vegetação [Floresta Estacional Semidecídua (- FES) e Floresta Paludosa (- FP)], com o intuito de investigar se há correlação com o tamanho dos forófitos (diâmetro e altura) e possíveis especificidades na colonização destes pelas epífitas. Na FP foi registrado um maior número de forófitos; no entanto, a abundância de epífitas não apresentou diferenças entre os dois tipos de vegetação. A distribuição vertical apresentou diferença entre os tipos de vegetação, com mais epífitas no fuste na FP, enquanto na FES a copa apresentou mais epífitas. Houve relação positiva da abundância de epífitas com o porte dos forófitos em ambas as fitofisionomias. Por outro lado, a densidade das espécies de árvores é provavelmente mais importante na FP para a colonização das epífitas. Os resultados mostraram a importância da heterogeneidade florestal na conservação e manutenção da assembleia de epífitos vasculares, demonstrada pelas diferenças na abundância e distribuição das epífitas, mesmo em florestas contíguas.Universidade Estadual Paulista Instituto de Biologia Departamento de BotânicaUniversidade Estadual Paulista Instituto de Biologia Departamento de BotânicaInstituto de BotânicaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Marcusso, Gabriel MendesKamimura, Vitor De AndradeMonteiro, Reinaldo2019-10-03T17:31:51Z2019-10-03T17:31:51Z2019info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2236-8906-23/2018Hoehnea. Instituto de Botânica, v. 46, n. 2, p. -, 2019.2236-8906http://hdl.handle.net/11449/18383710.1590/2236-8906-23/2018S2236-89062019000200203S2236-89062019000200203.pdfSciELOreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengHoehneainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-10-27T06:11:33Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/183837Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462023-10-27T06:11:33Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Epiphyte-phorophyte relationships: assessing the differences between Seasonal Semideciduous and Swamp Forests in Southeastern Brazil1 Relações epífita-forófito: avaliando as diferenças entre florestas estacional semidecidual e paludosa no Sudeste do Brasil |
title |
Epiphyte-phorophyte relationships: assessing the differences between Seasonal Semideciduous and Swamp Forests in Southeastern Brazil1 |
spellingShingle |
Epiphyte-phorophyte relationships: assessing the differences between Seasonal Semideciduous and Swamp Forests in Southeastern Brazil1 Marcusso, Gabriel Mendes atlantic forest hemiepiphytes holoepiphytes host tree vertical distribution árvore hospedeira distribuição vertical floresta atlântica hemiepífitas holoepífitas |
title_short |
Epiphyte-phorophyte relationships: assessing the differences between Seasonal Semideciduous and Swamp Forests in Southeastern Brazil1 |
title_full |
Epiphyte-phorophyte relationships: assessing the differences between Seasonal Semideciduous and Swamp Forests in Southeastern Brazil1 |
title_fullStr |
Epiphyte-phorophyte relationships: assessing the differences between Seasonal Semideciduous and Swamp Forests in Southeastern Brazil1 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Epiphyte-phorophyte relationships: assessing the differences between Seasonal Semideciduous and Swamp Forests in Southeastern Brazil1 |
title_sort |
Epiphyte-phorophyte relationships: assessing the differences between Seasonal Semideciduous and Swamp Forests in Southeastern Brazil1 |
author |
Marcusso, Gabriel Mendes |
author_facet |
Marcusso, Gabriel Mendes Kamimura, Vitor De Andrade Monteiro, Reinaldo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Kamimura, Vitor De Andrade Monteiro, Reinaldo |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Marcusso, Gabriel Mendes Kamimura, Vitor De Andrade Monteiro, Reinaldo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
atlantic forest hemiepiphytes holoepiphytes host tree vertical distribution árvore hospedeira distribuição vertical floresta atlântica hemiepífitas holoepífitas |
topic |
atlantic forest hemiepiphytes holoepiphytes host tree vertical distribution árvore hospedeira distribuição vertical floresta atlântica hemiepífitas holoepífitas |
description |
ABSTRACT Vascular epiphytes are responsible for a considerable portion of tropical biodiversity; however, the variation of epiphytes-phorophytes relationships in different vegetation types are still poorly understood. In this study, we aimed to assess the presence, abundance, vertical distribution, and life cycle (holoepiphyte and hemiepiphyte) of vascular epiphytes in two vegetation types [Seasonal Semideciduous Forest (- SSF), and Swamp Forest (- SF)] in order to determine any correlation with phorophyte size (diameter and height) and the specificity of phorophyte species to the epiphytic colonization. There was a higher number of phorophytes in SF; however, epiphytes density did not differ between the vegetation types. The recorded vertical distribution also showed different patterns: in the SSF, most epiphytes were found in the canopy, while in the SF they occurred mainly on the trunks of the trees. The abundance of epiphytes was positively correlated with the phorophyte size in the two vegetation types. In the SSF, colonization of phorophytes by epiphytes appeared to be less species-specific than in the SF, where trees density is likely to be a more significant factor to epiphytic colonization. The results showed the importance of the forest heterogeneity in the conservation and maintenance of vascular epiphytes assemblage, demonstrated by differences in the abundance and distribution of the epiphytes, even in contiguous forests. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-10-03T17:31:51Z 2019-10-03T17:31:51Z 2019 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2236-8906-23/2018 Hoehnea. Instituto de Botânica, v. 46, n. 2, p. -, 2019. 2236-8906 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/183837 10.1590/2236-8906-23/2018 S2236-89062019000200203 S2236-89062019000200203.pdf |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2236-8906-23/2018 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/183837 |
identifier_str_mv |
Hoehnea. Instituto de Botânica, v. 46, n. 2, p. -, 2019. 2236-8906 10.1590/2236-8906-23/2018 S2236-89062019000200203 S2236-89062019000200203.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Hoehnea |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
- application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Botânica |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Botânica |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
SciELO reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1834484173499269120 |