Export Ready — 

Bond and topography evaluation of a Y-TZP ceramic with a superficial low-fusing porcelain glass layer after different hydrofluoric acid etching protocols

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: SimÕes, Arthur Chaves
Publication Date: 2018
Other Authors: Miranda, Jean Soares, Souza, Rodrigo Othávio De Assunção E, Kimpara, Estevão Tomomitsu, Leite, Fabíola Pessôa Pereira
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Download full: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-2577.10118
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/183791
Summary: AbstractIntroductionDespite being one of the most studied ceramics today, zirconia still does not have a well-defined adhesion protocol.ObjectiveEvaluate the influence of different etching times and hydrofluoric acid (HF) concentrations on the zirconia surface and bond strength between a vitrified Y-TZP ceramic and a resin cement.Materials and methodThe zirconia surface treatments were: sandblasting with silica-coated alumina (Co); glaze application + 5% HF etching for 5s (G5-5s), 10s (G5-10s) or 20s (G5-20s); glaze application + 10% HF etching for 5s (G10-5s), 10 (G10-10s) or 20s (G10-20s) . Then, cement cylinders (3.3 × 3.3 mm) were built up for shear bond test on all specimens. The specimens were subjected to 6000 thermal cycling before the test. Fractures were analyzed by stereomicroscope. Data were statistically analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn statistical tests (5%). Extra samples of each group were made to obtain profilometry and scanning electron microscopy (SEM).ResultZirconia-cement bond strength was affected by the ceramic surface treatments (p = 0.001). G10-5s (2.71 MPa) recorded the highest bond strength values, followed by the Co (2.05 MPa) while G5 groups had the lowest bond value. Adhesive failure of the samples predominated. The image analysis revealed G5 groups seem to have a lower roughness when compared to groups treated by 10% HF. The creation of pores in the low-fusing porcelain glass layer surface occurred only when 10% HF was used.ConclusionThe low-fusing porcelain glass layer application was able to overcome the sandblasting and obtain a greater adhesive bond to the resinous cement, however, only when 10% HF was used for an interval of 5 seconds.
id UNSP_683b15e11ee95086d17112097b4e8703
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/183791
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Bond and topography evaluation of a Y-TZP ceramic with a superficial low-fusing porcelain glass layer after different hydrofluoric acid etching protocolsAvaliação da adesão e topografia de uma zircônia Y-TZP com uma camada de glaze após diferentes protocolos de condicionamento com ácido fluorídricoZirconiaglazeadhesionsurface treatmentZirconiaglazeadesãotratamento de superfícieAbstractIntroductionDespite being one of the most studied ceramics today, zirconia still does not have a well-defined adhesion protocol.ObjectiveEvaluate the influence of different etching times and hydrofluoric acid (HF) concentrations on the zirconia surface and bond strength between a vitrified Y-TZP ceramic and a resin cement.Materials and methodThe zirconia surface treatments were: sandblasting with silica-coated alumina (Co); glaze application + 5% HF etching for 5s (G5-5s), 10s (G5-10s) or 20s (G5-20s); glaze application + 10% HF etching for 5s (G10-5s), 10 (G10-10s) or 20s (G10-20s) . Then, cement cylinders (3.3 × 3.3 mm) were built up for shear bond test on all specimens. The specimens were subjected to 6000 thermal cycling before the test. Fractures were analyzed by stereomicroscope. Data were statistically analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn statistical tests (5%). Extra samples of each group were made to obtain profilometry and scanning electron microscopy (SEM).ResultZirconia-cement bond strength was affected by the ceramic surface treatments (p = 0.001). G10-5s (2.71 MPa) recorded the highest bond strength values, followed by the Co (2.05 MPa) while G5 groups had the lowest bond value. Adhesive failure of the samples predominated. The image analysis revealed G5 groups seem to have a lower roughness when compared to groups treated by 10% HF. The creation of pores in the low-fusing porcelain glass layer surface occurred only when 10% HF was used.ConclusionThe low-fusing porcelain glass layer application was able to overcome the sandblasting and obtain a greater adhesive bond to the resinous cement, however, only when 10% HF was used for an interval of 5 seconds.ResumoIntroduçãoApesar de ser uma das cerâmicas mais estudadas atualmente, a zircônia ainda não possui um protocolo bem definido para uma cimentação adesiva.ObjetivoAvaliar a influência de diferentes tempos de condicionamento e concentrações do ácido fluorídrico (AF) na superfície da zirconia e na resistência de união entre uma cerâmica Y-TZP vitrificada e um cimento resinoso.Material e métodoOs tratamentos de superfície foram: jateamento com óxido de alumínio revestido com sílica (Co); aplicação de glaze + condicionamento com AF 5% por 5s (G5-5s), 10s (G5-10s) ou 20s (G5-20s); aplicação de glaze + condicionamento com AF 10% por 5s (G10-5s), 10 (G10-10s) ou 20s (G10-20s). Em seguida, cilindros de cimento (3,3 × 3,3mm) para teste de cisalhamento foram feitos em todos os espécimes. Os espécimes foram submetidos a 6000 ciclos térmicos antes do teste de adesão. As fraturas foram analisadas por estereomicroscópio. Os dados foram analisados ​​estatisticamente por Kruskal-Wallis e Dunn (5%). Amostras extra de cada grupo foram feitas para realização de perfilometria e microscopia eletrônica de varredura (MEV).ResultadoA resistência de união zircônia-cimento foi afetada pelos tratamentos de superfície (p = 0,001). Os grupos G10-5s (2,71 MPa) registraram os maiores valores de resistência de união, seguidos pelos Co (2,05 MPa), enquanto os grupos G5 apresentaram o menor valor de união. Falhas adesivas foram predominantes. As análises por imagem revelaram que os grupos G5 parecem ser menos rugosos quando comparados aos grupos tratados com AF 10%. A criação de poros na superfície vítrea (glaze) ocorreu apenas quando foi utilizado AF 10%.ConclusãoA aplicação de camada de vidro de porcelana de baixa fusão foi capaz de superar o jateamento e obter uma maior adesão adesiva ao cimento resinoso, no entanto, somente quando foi utilizado 10% de HF por um intervalo de 5 segundos.Universidade Federal de Juiz de ForaUniversidade Estadual Paulista Instituto de Ciência e TecnologiaUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do NorteUniversidade Estadual Paulista Instituto de Ciência e TecnologiaUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita FilhoUniversidade Federal de Juiz de ForaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do NorteSimÕes, Arthur ChavesMiranda, Jean SoaresSouza, Rodrigo Othávio De Assunção EKimpara, Estevão TomomitsuLeite, Fabíola Pessôa Pereira2019-10-03T17:31:39Z2019-10-03T17:31:39Z2018-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article348-353application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-2577.10118Revista de Odontologia da UNESP. Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, v. 47, n. 6, p. 348-353, 2018.1807-2577http://hdl.handle.net/11449/18379110.1590/1807-2577.10118S1807-25772018000600348S1807-25772018000600348.pdf9679163886657540000-0003-0586-4644SciELOreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengRevista de Odontologia da UNESPinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-12-17T06:16:16Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/183791Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462023-12-17T06:16:16Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Bond and topography evaluation of a Y-TZP ceramic with a superficial low-fusing porcelain glass layer after different hydrofluoric acid etching protocols
Avaliação da adesão e topografia de uma zircônia Y-TZP com uma camada de glaze após diferentes protocolos de condicionamento com ácido fluorídrico
title Bond and topography evaluation of a Y-TZP ceramic with a superficial low-fusing porcelain glass layer after different hydrofluoric acid etching protocols
spellingShingle Bond and topography evaluation of a Y-TZP ceramic with a superficial low-fusing porcelain glass layer after different hydrofluoric acid etching protocols
SimÕes, Arthur Chaves
Zirconia
glaze
adhesion
surface treatment
Zirconia
glaze
adesão
tratamento de superfície
title_short Bond and topography evaluation of a Y-TZP ceramic with a superficial low-fusing porcelain glass layer after different hydrofluoric acid etching protocols
title_full Bond and topography evaluation of a Y-TZP ceramic with a superficial low-fusing porcelain glass layer after different hydrofluoric acid etching protocols
title_fullStr Bond and topography evaluation of a Y-TZP ceramic with a superficial low-fusing porcelain glass layer after different hydrofluoric acid etching protocols
title_full_unstemmed Bond and topography evaluation of a Y-TZP ceramic with a superficial low-fusing porcelain glass layer after different hydrofluoric acid etching protocols
title_sort Bond and topography evaluation of a Y-TZP ceramic with a superficial low-fusing porcelain glass layer after different hydrofluoric acid etching protocols
author SimÕes, Arthur Chaves
author_facet SimÕes, Arthur Chaves
Miranda, Jean Soares
Souza, Rodrigo Othávio De Assunção E
Kimpara, Estevão Tomomitsu
Leite, Fabíola Pessôa Pereira
author_role author
author2 Miranda, Jean Soares
Souza, Rodrigo Othávio De Assunção E
Kimpara, Estevão Tomomitsu
Leite, Fabíola Pessôa Pereira
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv SimÕes, Arthur Chaves
Miranda, Jean Soares
Souza, Rodrigo Othávio De Assunção E
Kimpara, Estevão Tomomitsu
Leite, Fabíola Pessôa Pereira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Zirconia
glaze
adhesion
surface treatment
Zirconia
glaze
adesão
tratamento de superfície
topic Zirconia
glaze
adhesion
surface treatment
Zirconia
glaze
adesão
tratamento de superfície
description AbstractIntroductionDespite being one of the most studied ceramics today, zirconia still does not have a well-defined adhesion protocol.ObjectiveEvaluate the influence of different etching times and hydrofluoric acid (HF) concentrations on the zirconia surface and bond strength between a vitrified Y-TZP ceramic and a resin cement.Materials and methodThe zirconia surface treatments were: sandblasting with silica-coated alumina (Co); glaze application + 5% HF etching for 5s (G5-5s), 10s (G5-10s) or 20s (G5-20s); glaze application + 10% HF etching for 5s (G10-5s), 10 (G10-10s) or 20s (G10-20s) . Then, cement cylinders (3.3 × 3.3 mm) were built up for shear bond test on all specimens. The specimens were subjected to 6000 thermal cycling before the test. Fractures were analyzed by stereomicroscope. Data were statistically analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn statistical tests (5%). Extra samples of each group were made to obtain profilometry and scanning electron microscopy (SEM).ResultZirconia-cement bond strength was affected by the ceramic surface treatments (p = 0.001). G10-5s (2.71 MPa) recorded the highest bond strength values, followed by the Co (2.05 MPa) while G5 groups had the lowest bond value. Adhesive failure of the samples predominated. The image analysis revealed G5 groups seem to have a lower roughness when compared to groups treated by 10% HF. The creation of pores in the low-fusing porcelain glass layer surface occurred only when 10% HF was used.ConclusionThe low-fusing porcelain glass layer application was able to overcome the sandblasting and obtain a greater adhesive bond to the resinous cement, however, only when 10% HF was used for an interval of 5 seconds.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-01
2019-10-03T17:31:39Z
2019-10-03T17:31:39Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-2577.10118
Revista de Odontologia da UNESP. Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, v. 47, n. 6, p. 348-353, 2018.
1807-2577
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/183791
10.1590/1807-2577.10118
S1807-25772018000600348
S1807-25772018000600348.pdf
967916388665754
0000-0003-0586-4644
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-2577.10118
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/183791
identifier_str_mv Revista de Odontologia da UNESP. Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, v. 47, n. 6, p. 348-353, 2018.
1807-2577
10.1590/1807-2577.10118
S1807-25772018000600348
S1807-25772018000600348.pdf
967916388665754
0000-0003-0586-4644
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Odontologia da UNESP
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 348-353
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv SciELO
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1834484544232751104