Effects of integrating legumes or trees on soil C stock and organic matter dynamics in tropical grasslands

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Souza de Sousa, Camila Eduarda
Publication Date: 2024
Other Authors: Amaral Júnior, Francisco Paulo [UNESP], Cardoso, Abmael da Silva, Ruggieri, Ana Cláudia [UNESP], van Cleef, Flavia de Oliveira Scarpino, de Pádua, Fábio Teixeira, Almeida, João Carlos de Carvalho
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Download full: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2024.105560
https://hdl.handle.net/11449/298684
Summary: The utilization of integrated systems in livestock production has been implemented as a practice aimed at intensifying pasture area utilization while maintaining sustainable soil management to enhance total organic carbon (TOC) storage. However, the dynamics of organic carbon in the soil of integrated systems, involving the inclusion of legumes or tree components in pastures, are not fully understood. Our research assessed soils from pastures composed of grass-legume consortia (GLS), silvopastoral systems (SPS), and monoculture grass pastures (MP), comparing them to native forest soil (NF) in the Cerrado biome, at different evaluation depths: 0–5 cm, 5–10 cm, 10–20 cm, and 20–30 cm. The objective was to evaluate the potential of each system to store carbon in the soil in contrast to native forest soil by determining the labile carbon, water-soluble organic carbon, microbial biomass carbon, total carbon, total nitrogen, carbon management index, and soil carbon stock. No differences were observed for TOC and soil carbon stock between GLS and SPS, but both were demonstrated to be lesser than in the NF soil (p < 0.05). SPS, MP, and NF did not differ in terms of labile carbon, water-soluble carbon, and microbial biomass carbon content (p > 0.05), while GLS did not show similarity to NF in any of the analyzed variables (p < 0.05). Only the SPS achieved a CMI >100 in all soil depth ranges evaluated. Our study demonstrated that the association among labile carbon fractions dynamics and the relationship between CMI and soil biological attributes can be used as a proxy for TOC dynamics and indicators of a production system's potential to sequester carbon in the soil. Collectively, the studied variables indicate that the silvopastoral system exhibited greater potential for carbon recovery compared to the grass-legume integration system or monoculture grass pasture.
id UNSP_63d9b4fdd39e84a874631fcaaf90089c
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/298684
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Effects of integrating legumes or trees on soil C stock and organic matter dynamics in tropical grasslandsCarbon stockIntegrated systemsOrganic matterThe utilization of integrated systems in livestock production has been implemented as a practice aimed at intensifying pasture area utilization while maintaining sustainable soil management to enhance total organic carbon (TOC) storage. However, the dynamics of organic carbon in the soil of integrated systems, involving the inclusion of legumes or tree components in pastures, are not fully understood. Our research assessed soils from pastures composed of grass-legume consortia (GLS), silvopastoral systems (SPS), and monoculture grass pastures (MP), comparing them to native forest soil (NF) in the Cerrado biome, at different evaluation depths: 0–5 cm, 5–10 cm, 10–20 cm, and 20–30 cm. The objective was to evaluate the potential of each system to store carbon in the soil in contrast to native forest soil by determining the labile carbon, water-soluble organic carbon, microbial biomass carbon, total carbon, total nitrogen, carbon management index, and soil carbon stock. No differences were observed for TOC and soil carbon stock between GLS and SPS, but both were demonstrated to be lesser than in the NF soil (p < 0.05). SPS, MP, and NF did not differ in terms of labile carbon, water-soluble carbon, and microbial biomass carbon content (p > 0.05), while GLS did not show similarity to NF in any of the analyzed variables (p < 0.05). Only the SPS achieved a CMI >100 in all soil depth ranges evaluated. Our study demonstrated that the association among labile carbon fractions dynamics and the relationship between CMI and soil biological attributes can be used as a proxy for TOC dynamics and indicators of a production system's potential to sequester carbon in the soil. Collectively, the studied variables indicate that the silvopastoral system exhibited greater potential for carbon recovery compared to the grass-legume integration system or monoculture grass pasture.Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro UFRRJ, BR-465, Km 7 s/n, Rio de JaneiroCollege of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences UNESP – São Paulo State University, Access Way Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane s/n, SPUniversity of Florida Ona Range Cattle and Education Center, 3401 Experimental StationCenter for Nuclear Energy in Agriculture University of São Paulo, 313 Centenário AvenueFederal Institute of Rio de Janeiro IFRJ, José Breves Street 550, Rio de JaneiroCollege of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences UNESP – São Paulo State University, Access Way Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane s/n, SPUFRRJUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Ona Range Cattle and Education CenterUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)IFRJSouza de Sousa, Camila EduardaAmaral Júnior, Francisco Paulo [UNESP]Cardoso, Abmael da SilvaRuggieri, Ana Cláudia [UNESP]van Cleef, Flavia de Oliveira Scarpinode Pádua, Fábio TeixeiraAlmeida, João Carlos de Carvalho2025-04-29T18:37:51Z2024-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2024.105560Applied Soil Ecology, v. 202.0929-1393https://hdl.handle.net/11449/29868410.1016/j.apsoil.2024.1055602-s2.0-85200628669Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengApplied Soil Ecologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2025-04-30T14:23:54Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/298684Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462025-04-30T14:23:54Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effects of integrating legumes or trees on soil C stock and organic matter dynamics in tropical grasslands
title Effects of integrating legumes or trees on soil C stock and organic matter dynamics in tropical grasslands
spellingShingle Effects of integrating legumes or trees on soil C stock and organic matter dynamics in tropical grasslands
Souza de Sousa, Camila Eduarda
Carbon stock
Integrated systems
Organic matter
title_short Effects of integrating legumes or trees on soil C stock and organic matter dynamics in tropical grasslands
title_full Effects of integrating legumes or trees on soil C stock and organic matter dynamics in tropical grasslands
title_fullStr Effects of integrating legumes or trees on soil C stock and organic matter dynamics in tropical grasslands
title_full_unstemmed Effects of integrating legumes or trees on soil C stock and organic matter dynamics in tropical grasslands
title_sort Effects of integrating legumes or trees on soil C stock and organic matter dynamics in tropical grasslands
author Souza de Sousa, Camila Eduarda
author_facet Souza de Sousa, Camila Eduarda
Amaral Júnior, Francisco Paulo [UNESP]
Cardoso, Abmael da Silva
Ruggieri, Ana Cláudia [UNESP]
van Cleef, Flavia de Oliveira Scarpino
de Pádua, Fábio Teixeira
Almeida, João Carlos de Carvalho
author_role author
author2 Amaral Júnior, Francisco Paulo [UNESP]
Cardoso, Abmael da Silva
Ruggieri, Ana Cláudia [UNESP]
van Cleef, Flavia de Oliveira Scarpino
de Pádua, Fábio Teixeira
Almeida, João Carlos de Carvalho
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv UFRRJ
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Ona Range Cattle and Education Center
Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
IFRJ
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Souza de Sousa, Camila Eduarda
Amaral Júnior, Francisco Paulo [UNESP]
Cardoso, Abmael da Silva
Ruggieri, Ana Cláudia [UNESP]
van Cleef, Flavia de Oliveira Scarpino
de Pádua, Fábio Teixeira
Almeida, João Carlos de Carvalho
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Carbon stock
Integrated systems
Organic matter
topic Carbon stock
Integrated systems
Organic matter
description The utilization of integrated systems in livestock production has been implemented as a practice aimed at intensifying pasture area utilization while maintaining sustainable soil management to enhance total organic carbon (TOC) storage. However, the dynamics of organic carbon in the soil of integrated systems, involving the inclusion of legumes or tree components in pastures, are not fully understood. Our research assessed soils from pastures composed of grass-legume consortia (GLS), silvopastoral systems (SPS), and monoculture grass pastures (MP), comparing them to native forest soil (NF) in the Cerrado biome, at different evaluation depths: 0–5 cm, 5–10 cm, 10–20 cm, and 20–30 cm. The objective was to evaluate the potential of each system to store carbon in the soil in contrast to native forest soil by determining the labile carbon, water-soluble organic carbon, microbial biomass carbon, total carbon, total nitrogen, carbon management index, and soil carbon stock. No differences were observed for TOC and soil carbon stock between GLS and SPS, but both were demonstrated to be lesser than in the NF soil (p < 0.05). SPS, MP, and NF did not differ in terms of labile carbon, water-soluble carbon, and microbial biomass carbon content (p > 0.05), while GLS did not show similarity to NF in any of the analyzed variables (p < 0.05). Only the SPS achieved a CMI >100 in all soil depth ranges evaluated. Our study demonstrated that the association among labile carbon fractions dynamics and the relationship between CMI and soil biological attributes can be used as a proxy for TOC dynamics and indicators of a production system's potential to sequester carbon in the soil. Collectively, the studied variables indicate that the silvopastoral system exhibited greater potential for carbon recovery compared to the grass-legume integration system or monoculture grass pasture.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-10-01
2025-04-29T18:37:51Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2024.105560
Applied Soil Ecology, v. 202.
0929-1393
https://hdl.handle.net/11449/298684
10.1016/j.apsoil.2024.105560
2-s2.0-85200628669
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2024.105560
https://hdl.handle.net/11449/298684
identifier_str_mv Applied Soil Ecology, v. 202.
0929-1393
10.1016/j.apsoil.2024.105560
2-s2.0-85200628669
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Applied Soil Ecology
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1834482906330824704