Effects of integrating legumes or trees on soil C stock and organic matter dynamics in tropical grasslands
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2024 |
Other Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Download full: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2024.105560 https://hdl.handle.net/11449/298684 |
Summary: | The utilization of integrated systems in livestock production has been implemented as a practice aimed at intensifying pasture area utilization while maintaining sustainable soil management to enhance total organic carbon (TOC) storage. However, the dynamics of organic carbon in the soil of integrated systems, involving the inclusion of legumes or tree components in pastures, are not fully understood. Our research assessed soils from pastures composed of grass-legume consortia (GLS), silvopastoral systems (SPS), and monoculture grass pastures (MP), comparing them to native forest soil (NF) in the Cerrado biome, at different evaluation depths: 0–5 cm, 5–10 cm, 10–20 cm, and 20–30 cm. The objective was to evaluate the potential of each system to store carbon in the soil in contrast to native forest soil by determining the labile carbon, water-soluble organic carbon, microbial biomass carbon, total carbon, total nitrogen, carbon management index, and soil carbon stock. No differences were observed for TOC and soil carbon stock between GLS and SPS, but both were demonstrated to be lesser than in the NF soil (p < 0.05). SPS, MP, and NF did not differ in terms of labile carbon, water-soluble carbon, and microbial biomass carbon content (p > 0.05), while GLS did not show similarity to NF in any of the analyzed variables (p < 0.05). Only the SPS achieved a CMI >100 in all soil depth ranges evaluated. Our study demonstrated that the association among labile carbon fractions dynamics and the relationship between CMI and soil biological attributes can be used as a proxy for TOC dynamics and indicators of a production system's potential to sequester carbon in the soil. Collectively, the studied variables indicate that the silvopastoral system exhibited greater potential for carbon recovery compared to the grass-legume integration system or monoculture grass pasture. |
id |
UNSP_63d9b4fdd39e84a874631fcaaf90089c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/298684 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Effects of integrating legumes or trees on soil C stock and organic matter dynamics in tropical grasslandsCarbon stockIntegrated systemsOrganic matterThe utilization of integrated systems in livestock production has been implemented as a practice aimed at intensifying pasture area utilization while maintaining sustainable soil management to enhance total organic carbon (TOC) storage. However, the dynamics of organic carbon in the soil of integrated systems, involving the inclusion of legumes or tree components in pastures, are not fully understood. Our research assessed soils from pastures composed of grass-legume consortia (GLS), silvopastoral systems (SPS), and monoculture grass pastures (MP), comparing them to native forest soil (NF) in the Cerrado biome, at different evaluation depths: 0–5 cm, 5–10 cm, 10–20 cm, and 20–30 cm. The objective was to evaluate the potential of each system to store carbon in the soil in contrast to native forest soil by determining the labile carbon, water-soluble organic carbon, microbial biomass carbon, total carbon, total nitrogen, carbon management index, and soil carbon stock. No differences were observed for TOC and soil carbon stock between GLS and SPS, but both were demonstrated to be lesser than in the NF soil (p < 0.05). SPS, MP, and NF did not differ in terms of labile carbon, water-soluble carbon, and microbial biomass carbon content (p > 0.05), while GLS did not show similarity to NF in any of the analyzed variables (p < 0.05). Only the SPS achieved a CMI >100 in all soil depth ranges evaluated. Our study demonstrated that the association among labile carbon fractions dynamics and the relationship between CMI and soil biological attributes can be used as a proxy for TOC dynamics and indicators of a production system's potential to sequester carbon in the soil. Collectively, the studied variables indicate that the silvopastoral system exhibited greater potential for carbon recovery compared to the grass-legume integration system or monoculture grass pasture.Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro UFRRJ, BR-465, Km 7 s/n, Rio de JaneiroCollege of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences UNESP – São Paulo State University, Access Way Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane s/n, SPUniversity of Florida Ona Range Cattle and Education Center, 3401 Experimental StationCenter for Nuclear Energy in Agriculture University of São Paulo, 313 Centenário AvenueFederal Institute of Rio de Janeiro IFRJ, José Breves Street 550, Rio de JaneiroCollege of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences UNESP – São Paulo State University, Access Way Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane s/n, SPUFRRJUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Ona Range Cattle and Education CenterUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)IFRJSouza de Sousa, Camila EduardaAmaral Júnior, Francisco Paulo [UNESP]Cardoso, Abmael da SilvaRuggieri, Ana Cláudia [UNESP]van Cleef, Flavia de Oliveira Scarpinode Pádua, Fábio TeixeiraAlmeida, João Carlos de Carvalho2025-04-29T18:37:51Z2024-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2024.105560Applied Soil Ecology, v. 202.0929-1393https://hdl.handle.net/11449/29868410.1016/j.apsoil.2024.1055602-s2.0-85200628669Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengApplied Soil Ecologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2025-04-30T14:23:54Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/298684Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462025-04-30T14:23:54Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Effects of integrating legumes or trees on soil C stock and organic matter dynamics in tropical grasslands |
title |
Effects of integrating legumes or trees on soil C stock and organic matter dynamics in tropical grasslands |
spellingShingle |
Effects of integrating legumes or trees on soil C stock and organic matter dynamics in tropical grasslands Souza de Sousa, Camila Eduarda Carbon stock Integrated systems Organic matter |
title_short |
Effects of integrating legumes or trees on soil C stock and organic matter dynamics in tropical grasslands |
title_full |
Effects of integrating legumes or trees on soil C stock and organic matter dynamics in tropical grasslands |
title_fullStr |
Effects of integrating legumes or trees on soil C stock and organic matter dynamics in tropical grasslands |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effects of integrating legumes or trees on soil C stock and organic matter dynamics in tropical grasslands |
title_sort |
Effects of integrating legumes or trees on soil C stock and organic matter dynamics in tropical grasslands |
author |
Souza de Sousa, Camila Eduarda |
author_facet |
Souza de Sousa, Camila Eduarda Amaral Júnior, Francisco Paulo [UNESP] Cardoso, Abmael da Silva Ruggieri, Ana Cláudia [UNESP] van Cleef, Flavia de Oliveira Scarpino de Pádua, Fábio Teixeira Almeida, João Carlos de Carvalho |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Amaral Júnior, Francisco Paulo [UNESP] Cardoso, Abmael da Silva Ruggieri, Ana Cláudia [UNESP] van Cleef, Flavia de Oliveira Scarpino de Pádua, Fábio Teixeira Almeida, João Carlos de Carvalho |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
UFRRJ Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Ona Range Cattle and Education Center Universidade de São Paulo (USP) IFRJ |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Souza de Sousa, Camila Eduarda Amaral Júnior, Francisco Paulo [UNESP] Cardoso, Abmael da Silva Ruggieri, Ana Cláudia [UNESP] van Cleef, Flavia de Oliveira Scarpino de Pádua, Fábio Teixeira Almeida, João Carlos de Carvalho |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Carbon stock Integrated systems Organic matter |
topic |
Carbon stock Integrated systems Organic matter |
description |
The utilization of integrated systems in livestock production has been implemented as a practice aimed at intensifying pasture area utilization while maintaining sustainable soil management to enhance total organic carbon (TOC) storage. However, the dynamics of organic carbon in the soil of integrated systems, involving the inclusion of legumes or tree components in pastures, are not fully understood. Our research assessed soils from pastures composed of grass-legume consortia (GLS), silvopastoral systems (SPS), and monoculture grass pastures (MP), comparing them to native forest soil (NF) in the Cerrado biome, at different evaluation depths: 0–5 cm, 5–10 cm, 10–20 cm, and 20–30 cm. The objective was to evaluate the potential of each system to store carbon in the soil in contrast to native forest soil by determining the labile carbon, water-soluble organic carbon, microbial biomass carbon, total carbon, total nitrogen, carbon management index, and soil carbon stock. No differences were observed for TOC and soil carbon stock between GLS and SPS, but both were demonstrated to be lesser than in the NF soil (p < 0.05). SPS, MP, and NF did not differ in terms of labile carbon, water-soluble carbon, and microbial biomass carbon content (p > 0.05), while GLS did not show similarity to NF in any of the analyzed variables (p < 0.05). Only the SPS achieved a CMI >100 in all soil depth ranges evaluated. Our study demonstrated that the association among labile carbon fractions dynamics and the relationship between CMI and soil biological attributes can be used as a proxy for TOC dynamics and indicators of a production system's potential to sequester carbon in the soil. Collectively, the studied variables indicate that the silvopastoral system exhibited greater potential for carbon recovery compared to the grass-legume integration system or monoculture grass pasture. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-10-01 2025-04-29T18:37:51Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2024.105560 Applied Soil Ecology, v. 202. 0929-1393 https://hdl.handle.net/11449/298684 10.1016/j.apsoil.2024.105560 2-s2.0-85200628669 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2024.105560 https://hdl.handle.net/11449/298684 |
identifier_str_mv |
Applied Soil Ecology, v. 202. 0929-1393 10.1016/j.apsoil.2024.105560 2-s2.0-85200628669 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Applied Soil Ecology |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1834482906330824704 |