PERFORMANCE OF AIR INDUCTION SPRAY NOZZLE MODELS UNDER DIFFERENT OPERATING CONDITIONS
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2020 |
Other Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Download full: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v40n6p711-718/2020 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/208955 |
Summary: | For the successful application of phytosanitary products, it is essential to understand the spraying process well. The present work aims to evaluate the spectrum and speed of the droplets produced by different spray nozzle models with air induction, working under different operating conditions. The experiment was conducted using an entirely randomized design with five repetitions in a 3 x 3 x 3 factor scheme that incorporates three nozzle models (ADIA, AIXR, and GA), three nominal flows (0.76, 1.14, and 1.51 L min(-1)), and three operating pressures (200, 300, and 400 kPa). The spectrum and speed of the droplets were determined directly using a real-time droplet analyzer based on high-resolution image analysis. The spray nozzle model interfered with the results. The ADIA promoted Dv(0.5) (VMD) higher than AIXR and GA, reaching differences of up to 90%. The increase in pressure promoted a reduction in the droplet size; however, there was no well-defined behavior for the relationship between the flow rate and droplet size. The ADIA and AIXR gave rise to greater uniformity of the droplets in most of the evaluated conditions. The increase in pressure promoted an increase in the speed of the droplets. However, the effect of the nozzle model on this parameter was dependent on the flow. |
id |
UNSP_5efa714429cf0bb99a9a2ecb7e012cde |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/208955 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
PERFORMANCE OF AIR INDUCTION SPRAY NOZZLE MODELS UNDER DIFFERENT OPERATING CONDITIONSspray tipdroplet spectrumsprayerapplication technologyFor the successful application of phytosanitary products, it is essential to understand the spraying process well. The present work aims to evaluate the spectrum and speed of the droplets produced by different spray nozzle models with air induction, working under different operating conditions. The experiment was conducted using an entirely randomized design with five repetitions in a 3 x 3 x 3 factor scheme that incorporates three nozzle models (ADIA, AIXR, and GA), three nominal flows (0.76, 1.14, and 1.51 L min(-1)), and three operating pressures (200, 300, and 400 kPa). The spectrum and speed of the droplets were determined directly using a real-time droplet analyzer based on high-resolution image analysis. The spray nozzle model interfered with the results. The ADIA promoted Dv(0.5) (VMD) higher than AIXR and GA, reaching differences of up to 90%. The increase in pressure promoted a reduction in the droplet size; however, there was no well-defined behavior for the relationship between the flow rate and droplet size. The ADIA and AIXR gave rise to greater uniformity of the droplets in most of the evaluated conditions. The increase in pressure promoted an increase in the speed of the droplets. However, the effect of the nozzle model on this parameter was dependent on the flow.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG)Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Univ Fed Uberlandia, Uberlandia, MG, BrazilUniv Fed Uberlandia, Monte Carmelo, MG, BrazilUniv Nebraska Lincoln, North Platte, NE USASao Paulo State Univ, Botucatu, SP, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ, Botucatu, SP, BrazilSoc Brasil Engenharia AgricolaUniversidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)Univ Nebraska LincolnUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Cunha, Joao P. A. R. daFranca, Jorge A. L.Alvarenga, Cleyton B. deAlves, Guilherme S.Antuniassi, Ulisses R. [UNESP]2021-06-25T11:44:16Z2021-06-25T11:44:16Z2020-11-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article711-718application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v40n6p711-718/2020Engenharia Agricola. Jaboticabal: Soc Brasil Engenharia Agricola, v. 40, n. 6, p. 711-718, 2020.0100-6916http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20895510.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v40n6p711-718/2020S0100-69162020000600711WOS:000593005800007S0100-69162020000600711.pdfWeb of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengEngenharia Agricolainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-10-12T06:07:19Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/208955Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462025-03-28T15:28:58.142242Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
PERFORMANCE OF AIR INDUCTION SPRAY NOZZLE MODELS UNDER DIFFERENT OPERATING CONDITIONS |
title |
PERFORMANCE OF AIR INDUCTION SPRAY NOZZLE MODELS UNDER DIFFERENT OPERATING CONDITIONS |
spellingShingle |
PERFORMANCE OF AIR INDUCTION SPRAY NOZZLE MODELS UNDER DIFFERENT OPERATING CONDITIONS Cunha, Joao P. A. R. da spray tip droplet spectrum sprayer application technology |
title_short |
PERFORMANCE OF AIR INDUCTION SPRAY NOZZLE MODELS UNDER DIFFERENT OPERATING CONDITIONS |
title_full |
PERFORMANCE OF AIR INDUCTION SPRAY NOZZLE MODELS UNDER DIFFERENT OPERATING CONDITIONS |
title_fullStr |
PERFORMANCE OF AIR INDUCTION SPRAY NOZZLE MODELS UNDER DIFFERENT OPERATING CONDITIONS |
title_full_unstemmed |
PERFORMANCE OF AIR INDUCTION SPRAY NOZZLE MODELS UNDER DIFFERENT OPERATING CONDITIONS |
title_sort |
PERFORMANCE OF AIR INDUCTION SPRAY NOZZLE MODELS UNDER DIFFERENT OPERATING CONDITIONS |
author |
Cunha, Joao P. A. R. da |
author_facet |
Cunha, Joao P. A. R. da Franca, Jorge A. L. Alvarenga, Cleyton B. de Alves, Guilherme S. Antuniassi, Ulisses R. [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Franca, Jorge A. L. Alvarenga, Cleyton B. de Alves, Guilherme S. Antuniassi, Ulisses R. [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU) Univ Nebraska Lincoln Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cunha, Joao P. A. R. da Franca, Jorge A. L. Alvarenga, Cleyton B. de Alves, Guilherme S. Antuniassi, Ulisses R. [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
spray tip droplet spectrum sprayer application technology |
topic |
spray tip droplet spectrum sprayer application technology |
description |
For the successful application of phytosanitary products, it is essential to understand the spraying process well. The present work aims to evaluate the spectrum and speed of the droplets produced by different spray nozzle models with air induction, working under different operating conditions. The experiment was conducted using an entirely randomized design with five repetitions in a 3 x 3 x 3 factor scheme that incorporates three nozzle models (ADIA, AIXR, and GA), three nominal flows (0.76, 1.14, and 1.51 L min(-1)), and three operating pressures (200, 300, and 400 kPa). The spectrum and speed of the droplets were determined directly using a real-time droplet analyzer based on high-resolution image analysis. The spray nozzle model interfered with the results. The ADIA promoted Dv(0.5) (VMD) higher than AIXR and GA, reaching differences of up to 90%. The increase in pressure promoted a reduction in the droplet size; however, there was no well-defined behavior for the relationship between the flow rate and droplet size. The ADIA and AIXR gave rise to greater uniformity of the droplets in most of the evaluated conditions. The increase in pressure promoted an increase in the speed of the droplets. However, the effect of the nozzle model on this parameter was dependent on the flow. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-11-01 2021-06-25T11:44:16Z 2021-06-25T11:44:16Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v40n6p711-718/2020 Engenharia Agricola. Jaboticabal: Soc Brasil Engenharia Agricola, v. 40, n. 6, p. 711-718, 2020. 0100-6916 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/208955 10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v40n6p711-718/2020 S0100-69162020000600711 WOS:000593005800007 S0100-69162020000600711.pdf |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v40n6p711-718/2020 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/208955 |
identifier_str_mv |
Engenharia Agricola. Jaboticabal: Soc Brasil Engenharia Agricola, v. 40, n. 6, p. 711-718, 2020. 0100-6916 10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v40n6p711-718/2020 S0100-69162020000600711 WOS:000593005800007 S0100-69162020000600711.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Engenharia Agricola |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
711-718 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Soc Brasil Engenharia Agricola |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Soc Brasil Engenharia Agricola |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Web of Science reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1834483070511611904 |