Effect of glyphosate management, formulations and rates on the agronomic performance of maize with the cp4epsps gene
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2024 |
Other Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Download full: | http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1806-6690.20240013 https://hdl.handle.net/11449/298448 |
Summary: | Second-generation glyphosate-tolerant maize (Roundup Ready 2, RR2) is characterised by the expression of the cp4epsps gene. Despite some studies suggesting possible undesirable effects from the application of glyphosate in RR2 maize, other reports have demonstrated glyphosate selectivity for RR2 plants, with minor damage symptoms, if any, and with no negative effects on the chlorophyll indices. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different types of glyphosate management, formulations and rates of application on chlorophyll indices and the agronomic performance of an RR2 maize genotype expressing the cp4epsps gene. Five experiments were conducted in a full factorial design (2 x 5 x 5) to evaluate two types of management, two formulations and five rates of glyphosate. Damage symptoms, chlorophyll indices and variables related to agronomic performance (plant height, stem diameter, yield and 100-grain weight) were evaluated. Similar crop responses were found for each of the glyphosate formulations (potassium salt and isopropylamine salt) and types of management (single application and sequential application) under test, indicating that the use of glyphosate-based commercial products affords flexibility in terms of formulation and frequency of application. Glyphosate formulated as potassium salt or isopropylamine salt and applied to RR2 maize either in a single application (full rate) or in two sequential applications (each at half rate) has a similar effect and may therefore be used without distinction. However, it is important to consider the rate of application since high rates of glyphosate (especially greater than 1, 440 g ae ha-1) may affect the development and production of RR2 maize. |
id |
UNSP_58e57be9182f48c97b729acb69524e6b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/298448 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Effect of glyphosate management, formulations and rates on the agronomic performance of maize with the cp4epsps geneEPSPs inhibitorsGlyphosate-tolerant maizeHerbicide selectivityMaize yieldZea mays LSecond-generation glyphosate-tolerant maize (Roundup Ready 2, RR2) is characterised by the expression of the cp4epsps gene. Despite some studies suggesting possible undesirable effects from the application of glyphosate in RR2 maize, other reports have demonstrated glyphosate selectivity for RR2 plants, with minor damage symptoms, if any, and with no negative effects on the chlorophyll indices. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different types of glyphosate management, formulations and rates of application on chlorophyll indices and the agronomic performance of an RR2 maize genotype expressing the cp4epsps gene. Five experiments were conducted in a full factorial design (2 x 5 x 5) to evaluate two types of management, two formulations and five rates of glyphosate. Damage symptoms, chlorophyll indices and variables related to agronomic performance (plant height, stem diameter, yield and 100-grain weight) were evaluated. Similar crop responses were found for each of the glyphosate formulations (potassium salt and isopropylamine salt) and types of management (single application and sequential application) under test, indicating that the use of glyphosate-based commercial products affords flexibility in terms of formulation and frequency of application. Glyphosate formulated as potassium salt or isopropylamine salt and applied to RR2 maize either in a single application (full rate) or in two sequential applications (each at half rate) has a similar effect and may therefore be used without distinction. However, it is important to consider the rate of application since high rates of glyphosate (especially greater than 1, 440 g ae ha-1) may affect the development and production of RR2 maize.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Department of Agronomic Sciences Federal University of Paraná, Palotina-PRDepartment of Crop Science and Plant Health Federal University of Paraná, PRCrop Science Pesquisa e Consultoria Agronômica Ltda. (Crop Pesquisa), Maripá-PRAgronomy – Agriculture Graduate Program São Paulo State University Faculty of Agronomic Sciences, SPAgronomy – Plant Production Graduate Program Federal University of Paraná, PRDepartment of Crop Science University of São Paulo “Luiz de Queiroz” College of Agriculture, Piracicaba, SPAgronomy – Agriculture Graduate Program São Paulo State University Faculty of Agronomic Sciences, SPFederal University of ParanáCrop Science Pesquisa e Consultoria Agronômica Ltda. (Crop Pesquisa)Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Universidade de São Paulo (USP)Albrecht, Alfredo Junior PaiolaAlbrecht, Leandro PaiolaBarroso, Arthur Arrobas MartinsSilva, André Felipe MoreiraKrenchinski, Fábio Henrique [UNESP]Larini, Willian FelipeFilho, Ricardo Victoria2025-04-29T18:37:12Z2024-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1806-6690.20240013Revista Ciencia Agronomica, v. 55.1806-66900045-6888https://hdl.handle.net/11449/29844810.5935/1806-6690.202400132-s2.0-85197185541Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengRevista Ciencia Agronomicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2025-04-30T14:05:24Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/298448Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462025-04-30T14:05:24Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Effect of glyphosate management, formulations and rates on the agronomic performance of maize with the cp4epsps gene |
title |
Effect of glyphosate management, formulations and rates on the agronomic performance of maize with the cp4epsps gene |
spellingShingle |
Effect of glyphosate management, formulations and rates on the agronomic performance of maize with the cp4epsps gene Albrecht, Alfredo Junior Paiola EPSPs inhibitors Glyphosate-tolerant maize Herbicide selectivity Maize yield Zea mays L |
title_short |
Effect of glyphosate management, formulations and rates on the agronomic performance of maize with the cp4epsps gene |
title_full |
Effect of glyphosate management, formulations and rates on the agronomic performance of maize with the cp4epsps gene |
title_fullStr |
Effect of glyphosate management, formulations and rates on the agronomic performance of maize with the cp4epsps gene |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effect of glyphosate management, formulations and rates on the agronomic performance of maize with the cp4epsps gene |
title_sort |
Effect of glyphosate management, formulations and rates on the agronomic performance of maize with the cp4epsps gene |
author |
Albrecht, Alfredo Junior Paiola |
author_facet |
Albrecht, Alfredo Junior Paiola Albrecht, Leandro Paiola Barroso, Arthur Arrobas Martins Silva, André Felipe Moreira Krenchinski, Fábio Henrique [UNESP] Larini, Willian Felipe Filho, Ricardo Victoria |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Albrecht, Leandro Paiola Barroso, Arthur Arrobas Martins Silva, André Felipe Moreira Krenchinski, Fábio Henrique [UNESP] Larini, Willian Felipe Filho, Ricardo Victoria |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Federal University of Paraná Crop Science Pesquisa e Consultoria Agronômica Ltda. (Crop Pesquisa) Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Albrecht, Alfredo Junior Paiola Albrecht, Leandro Paiola Barroso, Arthur Arrobas Martins Silva, André Felipe Moreira Krenchinski, Fábio Henrique [UNESP] Larini, Willian Felipe Filho, Ricardo Victoria |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
EPSPs inhibitors Glyphosate-tolerant maize Herbicide selectivity Maize yield Zea mays L |
topic |
EPSPs inhibitors Glyphosate-tolerant maize Herbicide selectivity Maize yield Zea mays L |
description |
Second-generation glyphosate-tolerant maize (Roundup Ready 2, RR2) is characterised by the expression of the cp4epsps gene. Despite some studies suggesting possible undesirable effects from the application of glyphosate in RR2 maize, other reports have demonstrated glyphosate selectivity for RR2 plants, with minor damage symptoms, if any, and with no negative effects on the chlorophyll indices. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different types of glyphosate management, formulations and rates of application on chlorophyll indices and the agronomic performance of an RR2 maize genotype expressing the cp4epsps gene. Five experiments were conducted in a full factorial design (2 x 5 x 5) to evaluate two types of management, two formulations and five rates of glyphosate. Damage symptoms, chlorophyll indices and variables related to agronomic performance (plant height, stem diameter, yield and 100-grain weight) were evaluated. Similar crop responses were found for each of the glyphosate formulations (potassium salt and isopropylamine salt) and types of management (single application and sequential application) under test, indicating that the use of glyphosate-based commercial products affords flexibility in terms of formulation and frequency of application. Glyphosate formulated as potassium salt or isopropylamine salt and applied to RR2 maize either in a single application (full rate) or in two sequential applications (each at half rate) has a similar effect and may therefore be used without distinction. However, it is important to consider the rate of application since high rates of glyphosate (especially greater than 1, 440 g ae ha-1) may affect the development and production of RR2 maize. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-01-01 2025-04-29T18:37:12Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1806-6690.20240013 Revista Ciencia Agronomica, v. 55. 1806-6690 0045-6888 https://hdl.handle.net/11449/298448 10.5935/1806-6690.20240013 2-s2.0-85197185541 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1806-6690.20240013 https://hdl.handle.net/11449/298448 |
identifier_str_mv |
Revista Ciencia Agronomica, v. 55. 1806-6690 0045-6888 10.5935/1806-6690.20240013 2-s2.0-85197185541 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Ciencia Agronomica |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1834482668428853248 |