Effect of glyphosate management, formulations and rates on the agronomic performance of maize with the cp4epsps gene

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Albrecht, Alfredo Junior Paiola
Publication Date: 2024
Other Authors: Albrecht, Leandro Paiola, Barroso, Arthur Arrobas Martins, Silva, André Felipe Moreira, Krenchinski, Fábio Henrique [UNESP], Larini, Willian Felipe, Filho, Ricardo Victoria
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Download full: http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1806-6690.20240013
https://hdl.handle.net/11449/298448
Summary: Second-generation glyphosate-tolerant maize (Roundup Ready 2, RR2) is characterised by the expression of the cp4epsps gene. Despite some studies suggesting possible undesirable effects from the application of glyphosate in RR2 maize, other reports have demonstrated glyphosate selectivity for RR2 plants, with minor damage symptoms, if any, and with no negative effects on the chlorophyll indices. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different types of glyphosate management, formulations and rates of application on chlorophyll indices and the agronomic performance of an RR2 maize genotype expressing the cp4epsps gene. Five experiments were conducted in a full factorial design (2 x 5 x 5) to evaluate two types of management, two formulations and five rates of glyphosate. Damage symptoms, chlorophyll indices and variables related to agronomic performance (plant height, stem diameter, yield and 100-grain weight) were evaluated. Similar crop responses were found for each of the glyphosate formulations (potassium salt and isopropylamine salt) and types of management (single application and sequential application) under test, indicating that the use of glyphosate-based commercial products affords flexibility in terms of formulation and frequency of application. Glyphosate formulated as potassium salt or isopropylamine salt and applied to RR2 maize either in a single application (full rate) or in two sequential applications (each at half rate) has a similar effect and may therefore be used without distinction. However, it is important to consider the rate of application since high rates of glyphosate (especially greater than 1, 440 g ae ha-1) may affect the development and production of RR2 maize.
id UNSP_58e57be9182f48c97b729acb69524e6b
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/298448
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Effect of glyphosate management, formulations and rates on the agronomic performance of maize with the cp4epsps geneEPSPs inhibitorsGlyphosate-tolerant maizeHerbicide selectivityMaize yieldZea mays LSecond-generation glyphosate-tolerant maize (Roundup Ready 2, RR2) is characterised by the expression of the cp4epsps gene. Despite some studies suggesting possible undesirable effects from the application of glyphosate in RR2 maize, other reports have demonstrated glyphosate selectivity for RR2 plants, with minor damage symptoms, if any, and with no negative effects on the chlorophyll indices. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different types of glyphosate management, formulations and rates of application on chlorophyll indices and the agronomic performance of an RR2 maize genotype expressing the cp4epsps gene. Five experiments were conducted in a full factorial design (2 x 5 x 5) to evaluate two types of management, two formulations and five rates of glyphosate. Damage symptoms, chlorophyll indices and variables related to agronomic performance (plant height, stem diameter, yield and 100-grain weight) were evaluated. Similar crop responses were found for each of the glyphosate formulations (potassium salt and isopropylamine salt) and types of management (single application and sequential application) under test, indicating that the use of glyphosate-based commercial products affords flexibility in terms of formulation and frequency of application. Glyphosate formulated as potassium salt or isopropylamine salt and applied to RR2 maize either in a single application (full rate) or in two sequential applications (each at half rate) has a similar effect and may therefore be used without distinction. However, it is important to consider the rate of application since high rates of glyphosate (especially greater than 1, 440 g ae ha-1) may affect the development and production of RR2 maize.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Department of Agronomic Sciences Federal University of Paraná, Palotina-PRDepartment of Crop Science and Plant Health Federal University of Paraná, PRCrop Science Pesquisa e Consultoria Agronômica Ltda. (Crop Pesquisa), Maripá-PRAgronomy – Agriculture Graduate Program São Paulo State University Faculty of Agronomic Sciences, SPAgronomy – Plant Production Graduate Program Federal University of Paraná, PRDepartment of Crop Science University of São Paulo “Luiz de Queiroz” College of Agriculture, Piracicaba, SPAgronomy – Agriculture Graduate Program São Paulo State University Faculty of Agronomic Sciences, SPFederal University of ParanáCrop Science Pesquisa e Consultoria Agronômica Ltda. (Crop Pesquisa)Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Universidade de São Paulo (USP)Albrecht, Alfredo Junior PaiolaAlbrecht, Leandro PaiolaBarroso, Arthur Arrobas MartinsSilva, André Felipe MoreiraKrenchinski, Fábio Henrique [UNESP]Larini, Willian FelipeFilho, Ricardo Victoria2025-04-29T18:37:12Z2024-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1806-6690.20240013Revista Ciencia Agronomica, v. 55.1806-66900045-6888https://hdl.handle.net/11449/29844810.5935/1806-6690.202400132-s2.0-85197185541Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengRevista Ciencia Agronomicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2025-04-30T14:05:24Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/298448Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462025-04-30T14:05:24Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effect of glyphosate management, formulations and rates on the agronomic performance of maize with the cp4epsps gene
title Effect of glyphosate management, formulations and rates on the agronomic performance of maize with the cp4epsps gene
spellingShingle Effect of glyphosate management, formulations and rates on the agronomic performance of maize with the cp4epsps gene
Albrecht, Alfredo Junior Paiola
EPSPs inhibitors
Glyphosate-tolerant maize
Herbicide selectivity
Maize yield
Zea mays L
title_short Effect of glyphosate management, formulations and rates on the agronomic performance of maize with the cp4epsps gene
title_full Effect of glyphosate management, formulations and rates on the agronomic performance of maize with the cp4epsps gene
title_fullStr Effect of glyphosate management, formulations and rates on the agronomic performance of maize with the cp4epsps gene
title_full_unstemmed Effect of glyphosate management, formulations and rates on the agronomic performance of maize with the cp4epsps gene
title_sort Effect of glyphosate management, formulations and rates on the agronomic performance of maize with the cp4epsps gene
author Albrecht, Alfredo Junior Paiola
author_facet Albrecht, Alfredo Junior Paiola
Albrecht, Leandro Paiola
Barroso, Arthur Arrobas Martins
Silva, André Felipe Moreira
Krenchinski, Fábio Henrique [UNESP]
Larini, Willian Felipe
Filho, Ricardo Victoria
author_role author
author2 Albrecht, Leandro Paiola
Barroso, Arthur Arrobas Martins
Silva, André Felipe Moreira
Krenchinski, Fábio Henrique [UNESP]
Larini, Willian Felipe
Filho, Ricardo Victoria
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Federal University of Paraná
Crop Science Pesquisa e Consultoria Agronômica Ltda. (Crop Pesquisa)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Albrecht, Alfredo Junior Paiola
Albrecht, Leandro Paiola
Barroso, Arthur Arrobas Martins
Silva, André Felipe Moreira
Krenchinski, Fábio Henrique [UNESP]
Larini, Willian Felipe
Filho, Ricardo Victoria
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv EPSPs inhibitors
Glyphosate-tolerant maize
Herbicide selectivity
Maize yield
Zea mays L
topic EPSPs inhibitors
Glyphosate-tolerant maize
Herbicide selectivity
Maize yield
Zea mays L
description Second-generation glyphosate-tolerant maize (Roundup Ready 2, RR2) is characterised by the expression of the cp4epsps gene. Despite some studies suggesting possible undesirable effects from the application of glyphosate in RR2 maize, other reports have demonstrated glyphosate selectivity for RR2 plants, with minor damage symptoms, if any, and with no negative effects on the chlorophyll indices. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different types of glyphosate management, formulations and rates of application on chlorophyll indices and the agronomic performance of an RR2 maize genotype expressing the cp4epsps gene. Five experiments were conducted in a full factorial design (2 x 5 x 5) to evaluate two types of management, two formulations and five rates of glyphosate. Damage symptoms, chlorophyll indices and variables related to agronomic performance (plant height, stem diameter, yield and 100-grain weight) were evaluated. Similar crop responses were found for each of the glyphosate formulations (potassium salt and isopropylamine salt) and types of management (single application and sequential application) under test, indicating that the use of glyphosate-based commercial products affords flexibility in terms of formulation and frequency of application. Glyphosate formulated as potassium salt or isopropylamine salt and applied to RR2 maize either in a single application (full rate) or in two sequential applications (each at half rate) has a similar effect and may therefore be used without distinction. However, it is important to consider the rate of application since high rates of glyphosate (especially greater than 1, 440 g ae ha-1) may affect the development and production of RR2 maize.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-01-01
2025-04-29T18:37:12Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1806-6690.20240013
Revista Ciencia Agronomica, v. 55.
1806-6690
0045-6888
https://hdl.handle.net/11449/298448
10.5935/1806-6690.20240013
2-s2.0-85197185541
url http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1806-6690.20240013
https://hdl.handle.net/11449/298448
identifier_str_mv Revista Ciencia Agronomica, v. 55.
1806-6690
0045-6888
10.5935/1806-6690.20240013
2-s2.0-85197185541
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Revista Ciencia Agronomica
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1834482668428853248