AC.RankA: Rule Ranking Method via Aggregation of Objective Measures for Associative Classifiers

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Dall'agnol, Maicon [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2024
Outros Autores: Carvalho, Veronica Oliveira De [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3419130
https://hdl.handle.net/11449/297096
Resumo: Among the inherently interpretable learning algorithms are associative classifiers, which are induced in steps. Regarding the ranking step, it is carried out using objective measures in order to sort the rules. Generally, the CSC method is used based on the two standard measures of association rules (support and confidence). However, several measures are available in the literature, leading to a secondary problem, as there is no measure that is suitable for all explorations. In this context, new proposals have emerged, one of which aims to aggregate a set of measures in order to use them simultaneously. The idea is to reduce the need to choose a single measure, also considering different aspects (semantics) for ranking the rules. Works in this context have been proposed. However, they present problems in relation to the performance and/or interpretability of the generated models. In them it is possible to observe an inverse relationship between performance and interpretability, i.e., when model performance is high, interpretability is low (and vice versa). Therefore, this work presents a rule ranking method via aggregation of objective measures, named AC.RankA , to be incorporated into associative classifiers induction flows, aiming to obtain models that present a better balance between performance and interpretability. The method was evaluated by comparing several induction flows when ranking takes place via CSC (baseline) and via AC.RankA. The results demonstrate that AC.RankA can maintain the performance of the models, but with better interpretability.
id UNSP_585558f1fd5b1edfeab5eddeff3bbb37
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/297096
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling AC.RankA: Rule Ranking Method via Aggregation of Objective Measures for Associative ClassifiersaggregationAssociative classifiersinterpretabilityobjective measuresperformancerule rankingAmong the inherently interpretable learning algorithms are associative classifiers, which are induced in steps. Regarding the ranking step, it is carried out using objective measures in order to sort the rules. Generally, the CSC method is used based on the two standard measures of association rules (support and confidence). However, several measures are available in the literature, leading to a secondary problem, as there is no measure that is suitable for all explorations. In this context, new proposals have emerged, one of which aims to aggregate a set of measures in order to use them simultaneously. The idea is to reduce the need to choose a single measure, also considering different aspects (semantics) for ranking the rules. Works in this context have been proposed. However, they present problems in relation to the performance and/or interpretability of the generated models. In them it is possible to observe an inverse relationship between performance and interpretability, i.e., when model performance is high, interpretability is low (and vice versa). Therefore, this work presents a rule ranking method via aggregation of objective measures, named AC.RankA , to be incorporated into associative classifiers induction flows, aiming to obtain models that present a better balance between performance and interpretability. The method was evaluated by comparing several induction flows when ranking takes place via CSC (baseline) and via AC.RankA. The results demonstrate that AC.RankA can maintain the performance of the models, but with better interpretability.Instituto de Geociências e Ciências Exatas Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), São PauloInstituto de Geociências e Ciências Exatas Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), São PauloUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Dall'agnol, Maicon [UNESP]Carvalho, Veronica Oliveira De [UNESP]2025-04-29T18:05:34Z2024-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article88862-88882http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3419130IEEE Access, v. 12, p. 88862-88882.2169-3536https://hdl.handle.net/11449/29709610.1109/ACCESS.2024.34191302-s2.0-85197099833Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengIEEE Accessinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2025-04-30T14:28:23Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/297096Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462025-04-30T14:28:23Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv AC.RankA: Rule Ranking Method via Aggregation of Objective Measures for Associative Classifiers
title AC.RankA: Rule Ranking Method via Aggregation of Objective Measures for Associative Classifiers
spellingShingle AC.RankA: Rule Ranking Method via Aggregation of Objective Measures for Associative Classifiers
Dall'agnol, Maicon [UNESP]
aggregation
Associative classifiers
interpretability
objective measures
performance
rule ranking
title_short AC.RankA: Rule Ranking Method via Aggregation of Objective Measures for Associative Classifiers
title_full AC.RankA: Rule Ranking Method via Aggregation of Objective Measures for Associative Classifiers
title_fullStr AC.RankA: Rule Ranking Method via Aggregation of Objective Measures for Associative Classifiers
title_full_unstemmed AC.RankA: Rule Ranking Method via Aggregation of Objective Measures for Associative Classifiers
title_sort AC.RankA: Rule Ranking Method via Aggregation of Objective Measures for Associative Classifiers
author Dall'agnol, Maicon [UNESP]
author_facet Dall'agnol, Maicon [UNESP]
Carvalho, Veronica Oliveira De [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Carvalho, Veronica Oliveira De [UNESP]
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Dall'agnol, Maicon [UNESP]
Carvalho, Veronica Oliveira De [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv aggregation
Associative classifiers
interpretability
objective measures
performance
rule ranking
topic aggregation
Associative classifiers
interpretability
objective measures
performance
rule ranking
description Among the inherently interpretable learning algorithms are associative classifiers, which are induced in steps. Regarding the ranking step, it is carried out using objective measures in order to sort the rules. Generally, the CSC method is used based on the two standard measures of association rules (support and confidence). However, several measures are available in the literature, leading to a secondary problem, as there is no measure that is suitable for all explorations. In this context, new proposals have emerged, one of which aims to aggregate a set of measures in order to use them simultaneously. The idea is to reduce the need to choose a single measure, also considering different aspects (semantics) for ranking the rules. Works in this context have been proposed. However, they present problems in relation to the performance and/or interpretability of the generated models. In them it is possible to observe an inverse relationship between performance and interpretability, i.e., when model performance is high, interpretability is low (and vice versa). Therefore, this work presents a rule ranking method via aggregation of objective measures, named AC.RankA , to be incorporated into associative classifiers induction flows, aiming to obtain models that present a better balance between performance and interpretability. The method was evaluated by comparing several induction flows when ranking takes place via CSC (baseline) and via AC.RankA. The results demonstrate that AC.RankA can maintain the performance of the models, but with better interpretability.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-01-01
2025-04-29T18:05:34Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3419130
IEEE Access, v. 12, p. 88862-88882.
2169-3536
https://hdl.handle.net/11449/297096
10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3419130
2-s2.0-85197099833
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3419130
https://hdl.handle.net/11449/297096
identifier_str_mv IEEE Access, v. 12, p. 88862-88882.
2169-3536
10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3419130
2-s2.0-85197099833
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv IEEE Access
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 88862-88882
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1854948052461158400