Performance of spray nozzles and droplet size on glufosinate deposition and weed biological efficacy

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Prado, Evandro P. [UNESP]
Publication Date: 2024
Other Authors: Guerreiro, Júlio C., Ferreira-Filho, Pedro J., do Nascimento, Vagner [UNESP], Ferrari, Samuel [UNESP], Galindo, Fernando S. [UNESP], Funichello, Marina, Raetano, Carlos G. [UNESP], Pagliari, Paulo H., Chechetto, Rodolfo G., Rodrigues Neto, Arthur D. [UNESP]
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Download full: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2023.106560
https://hdl.handle.net/11449/301189
Summary: Nozzle type and droplet size are one of the most important factors that affect spray deposition and the efficacy of herbicides. This study focused on evaluating the performance of spray nozzles and droplet sizes on the deposition of glufosinate and its biological efficacy of two weed species. Treatments consisted of spraying glufosinate on Euphorbia heterophylla and Digitaria insularis by five spray nozzles (XR 11002 – fine droplet; TT 11002 – coarse; AIXR 11002 – very coarse; AIXR 110025 – extremely coarse; and TTI 11002 – ultra coarse) assessing the spray deposits and its influence on plant biomass reduction. The spray deposits on E. heterophylla were found to be similar between most of the spray nozzles, except for the TTI 11002 nozzle, which had lower spray deposits. In contrast, for D. insularis, the spray deposits tended to decrease as the droplet size increased. The spray uniformity was lower for the AIXR 11002 nozzle for E. heterophylla and the XR 11002 nozzle for D. insularis. Regarding the efficacy of glufosinate on both weeds, the lower C50 (concentration required for 50% dry weight reduction) were obtained using the XR 11002 nozzle with fine droplets. The TT 11002 nozzle and the AIXR 11002 nozzle showed intermediate C50, making them viable options to reduce spray drift and achieve acceptable weed control. However, the nozzles using extremely coarse (AIXR 110025) and ultra-coarse (TTI 11002) droplet class resulted in higher C50, indicating reduced herbicide efficacy. Our study provided clues on how different spray nozzles and droplet sizes can significantly impact spray deposits and herbicide efficacy on the control of E. heterophylla and D. insularis. Nozzles with fine droplet class generally provided better control, while extremely coarse and ultra-coarse showed reduced efficacy at weed control.
id UNSP_3b3916a80332cdc8567471eaa7b55be4
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/301189
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Performance of spray nozzles and droplet size on glufosinate deposition and weed biological efficacyHerbicide dose responsePesticide application technologySpray depositsWeed controlNozzle type and droplet size are one of the most important factors that affect spray deposition and the efficacy of herbicides. This study focused on evaluating the performance of spray nozzles and droplet sizes on the deposition of glufosinate and its biological efficacy of two weed species. Treatments consisted of spraying glufosinate on Euphorbia heterophylla and Digitaria insularis by five spray nozzles (XR 11002 – fine droplet; TT 11002 – coarse; AIXR 11002 – very coarse; AIXR 110025 – extremely coarse; and TTI 11002 – ultra coarse) assessing the spray deposits and its influence on plant biomass reduction. The spray deposits on E. heterophylla were found to be similar between most of the spray nozzles, except for the TTI 11002 nozzle, which had lower spray deposits. In contrast, for D. insularis, the spray deposits tended to decrease as the droplet size increased. The spray uniformity was lower for the AIXR 11002 nozzle for E. heterophylla and the XR 11002 nozzle for D. insularis. Regarding the efficacy of glufosinate on both weeds, the lower C50 (concentration required for 50% dry weight reduction) were obtained using the XR 11002 nozzle with fine droplets. The TT 11002 nozzle and the AIXR 11002 nozzle showed intermediate C50, making them viable options to reduce spray drift and achieve acceptable weed control. However, the nozzles using extremely coarse (AIXR 110025) and ultra-coarse (TTI 11002) droplet class resulted in higher C50, indicating reduced herbicide efficacy. Our study provided clues on how different spray nozzles and droplet sizes can significantly impact spray deposits and herbicide efficacy on the control of E. heterophylla and D. insularis. Nozzles with fine droplet class generally provided better control, while extremely coarse and ultra-coarse showed reduced efficacy at weed control.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Department of Crop Production College of Agricultural and Technological Science São Paulo State University (UNESP), Rod. Cmte João Ribeiro de Barros, km 65, SPDepartment of Agrarian Science Maringá State University (UEM), PRDepartment of Agrarian Science Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), SPFaculty of Technology (FATEC), SPDepartment of Plant Protection São Paulo State University (UNESP) 18610-034 Botucatu – SPDepartment of Soil Water and Climate Southwest Research and Outreach Center University of Minnesota, 23669, 130th, St.AgroEfetiva Ind. e Serviços LTDA, Distrito Industrial III, SPGraduate Program in Agronomy São Paulo State University (UNESP), SPDepartment of Crop Production College of Agricultural and Technological Science São Paulo State University (UNESP), Rod. Cmte João Ribeiro de Barros, km 65, SPDepartment of Plant Protection São Paulo State University (UNESP) 18610-034 Botucatu – SPGraduate Program in Agronomy São Paulo State University (UNESP), SPFAPESP: 2019/00533-5Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar)Faculty of Technology (FATEC)University of MinnesotaAgroEfetiva Ind. e Serviços LTDAPrado, Evandro P. [UNESP]Guerreiro, Júlio C.Ferreira-Filho, Pedro J.do Nascimento, Vagner [UNESP]Ferrari, Samuel [UNESP]Galindo, Fernando S. [UNESP]Funichello, MarinaRaetano, Carlos G. [UNESP]Pagliari, Paulo H.Chechetto, Rodolfo G.Rodrigues Neto, Arthur D. [UNESP]2025-04-29T18:57:28Z2024-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2023.106560Crop Protection, v. 177.0261-2194https://hdl.handle.net/11449/30118910.1016/j.cropro.2023.1065602-s2.0-85180607167Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengCrop Protectioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2025-04-30T13:36:41Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/301189Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462025-04-30T13:36:41Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Performance of spray nozzles and droplet size on glufosinate deposition and weed biological efficacy
title Performance of spray nozzles and droplet size on glufosinate deposition and weed biological efficacy
spellingShingle Performance of spray nozzles and droplet size on glufosinate deposition and weed biological efficacy
Prado, Evandro P. [UNESP]
Herbicide dose response
Pesticide application technology
Spray deposits
Weed control
title_short Performance of spray nozzles and droplet size on glufosinate deposition and weed biological efficacy
title_full Performance of spray nozzles and droplet size on glufosinate deposition and weed biological efficacy
title_fullStr Performance of spray nozzles and droplet size on glufosinate deposition and weed biological efficacy
title_full_unstemmed Performance of spray nozzles and droplet size on glufosinate deposition and weed biological efficacy
title_sort Performance of spray nozzles and droplet size on glufosinate deposition and weed biological efficacy
author Prado, Evandro P. [UNESP]
author_facet Prado, Evandro P. [UNESP]
Guerreiro, Júlio C.
Ferreira-Filho, Pedro J.
do Nascimento, Vagner [UNESP]
Ferrari, Samuel [UNESP]
Galindo, Fernando S. [UNESP]
Funichello, Marina
Raetano, Carlos G. [UNESP]
Pagliari, Paulo H.
Chechetto, Rodolfo G.
Rodrigues Neto, Arthur D. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Guerreiro, Júlio C.
Ferreira-Filho, Pedro J.
do Nascimento, Vagner [UNESP]
Ferrari, Samuel [UNESP]
Galindo, Fernando S. [UNESP]
Funichello, Marina
Raetano, Carlos G. [UNESP]
Pagliari, Paulo H.
Chechetto, Rodolfo G.
Rodrigues Neto, Arthur D. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar)
Faculty of Technology (FATEC)
University of Minnesota
AgroEfetiva Ind. e Serviços LTDA
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Prado, Evandro P. [UNESP]
Guerreiro, Júlio C.
Ferreira-Filho, Pedro J.
do Nascimento, Vagner [UNESP]
Ferrari, Samuel [UNESP]
Galindo, Fernando S. [UNESP]
Funichello, Marina
Raetano, Carlos G. [UNESP]
Pagliari, Paulo H.
Chechetto, Rodolfo G.
Rodrigues Neto, Arthur D. [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Herbicide dose response
Pesticide application technology
Spray deposits
Weed control
topic Herbicide dose response
Pesticide application technology
Spray deposits
Weed control
description Nozzle type and droplet size are one of the most important factors that affect spray deposition and the efficacy of herbicides. This study focused on evaluating the performance of spray nozzles and droplet sizes on the deposition of glufosinate and its biological efficacy of two weed species. Treatments consisted of spraying glufosinate on Euphorbia heterophylla and Digitaria insularis by five spray nozzles (XR 11002 – fine droplet; TT 11002 – coarse; AIXR 11002 – very coarse; AIXR 110025 – extremely coarse; and TTI 11002 – ultra coarse) assessing the spray deposits and its influence on plant biomass reduction. The spray deposits on E. heterophylla were found to be similar between most of the spray nozzles, except for the TTI 11002 nozzle, which had lower spray deposits. In contrast, for D. insularis, the spray deposits tended to decrease as the droplet size increased. The spray uniformity was lower for the AIXR 11002 nozzle for E. heterophylla and the XR 11002 nozzle for D. insularis. Regarding the efficacy of glufosinate on both weeds, the lower C50 (concentration required for 50% dry weight reduction) were obtained using the XR 11002 nozzle with fine droplets. The TT 11002 nozzle and the AIXR 11002 nozzle showed intermediate C50, making them viable options to reduce spray drift and achieve acceptable weed control. However, the nozzles using extremely coarse (AIXR 110025) and ultra-coarse (TTI 11002) droplet class resulted in higher C50, indicating reduced herbicide efficacy. Our study provided clues on how different spray nozzles and droplet sizes can significantly impact spray deposits and herbicide efficacy on the control of E. heterophylla and D. insularis. Nozzles with fine droplet class generally provided better control, while extremely coarse and ultra-coarse showed reduced efficacy at weed control.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-03-01
2025-04-29T18:57:28Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2023.106560
Crop Protection, v. 177.
0261-2194
https://hdl.handle.net/11449/301189
10.1016/j.cropro.2023.106560
2-s2.0-85180607167
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2023.106560
https://hdl.handle.net/11449/301189
identifier_str_mv Crop Protection, v. 177.
0261-2194
10.1016/j.cropro.2023.106560
2-s2.0-85180607167
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Crop Protection
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1834482387700940800