Performance of spray nozzles and droplet size on glufosinate deposition and weed biological efficacy
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2024 |
Other Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Download full: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2023.106560 https://hdl.handle.net/11449/301189 |
Summary: | Nozzle type and droplet size are one of the most important factors that affect spray deposition and the efficacy of herbicides. This study focused on evaluating the performance of spray nozzles and droplet sizes on the deposition of glufosinate and its biological efficacy of two weed species. Treatments consisted of spraying glufosinate on Euphorbia heterophylla and Digitaria insularis by five spray nozzles (XR 11002 – fine droplet; TT 11002 – coarse; AIXR 11002 – very coarse; AIXR 110025 – extremely coarse; and TTI 11002 – ultra coarse) assessing the spray deposits and its influence on plant biomass reduction. The spray deposits on E. heterophylla were found to be similar between most of the spray nozzles, except for the TTI 11002 nozzle, which had lower spray deposits. In contrast, for D. insularis, the spray deposits tended to decrease as the droplet size increased. The spray uniformity was lower for the AIXR 11002 nozzle for E. heterophylla and the XR 11002 nozzle for D. insularis. Regarding the efficacy of glufosinate on both weeds, the lower C50 (concentration required for 50% dry weight reduction) were obtained using the XR 11002 nozzle with fine droplets. The TT 11002 nozzle and the AIXR 11002 nozzle showed intermediate C50, making them viable options to reduce spray drift and achieve acceptable weed control. However, the nozzles using extremely coarse (AIXR 110025) and ultra-coarse (TTI 11002) droplet class resulted in higher C50, indicating reduced herbicide efficacy. Our study provided clues on how different spray nozzles and droplet sizes can significantly impact spray deposits and herbicide efficacy on the control of E. heterophylla and D. insularis. Nozzles with fine droplet class generally provided better control, while extremely coarse and ultra-coarse showed reduced efficacy at weed control. |
id |
UNSP_3b3916a80332cdc8567471eaa7b55be4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/301189 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Performance of spray nozzles and droplet size on glufosinate deposition and weed biological efficacyHerbicide dose responsePesticide application technologySpray depositsWeed controlNozzle type and droplet size are one of the most important factors that affect spray deposition and the efficacy of herbicides. This study focused on evaluating the performance of spray nozzles and droplet sizes on the deposition of glufosinate and its biological efficacy of two weed species. Treatments consisted of spraying glufosinate on Euphorbia heterophylla and Digitaria insularis by five spray nozzles (XR 11002 – fine droplet; TT 11002 – coarse; AIXR 11002 – very coarse; AIXR 110025 – extremely coarse; and TTI 11002 – ultra coarse) assessing the spray deposits and its influence on plant biomass reduction. The spray deposits on E. heterophylla were found to be similar between most of the spray nozzles, except for the TTI 11002 nozzle, which had lower spray deposits. In contrast, for D. insularis, the spray deposits tended to decrease as the droplet size increased. The spray uniformity was lower for the AIXR 11002 nozzle for E. heterophylla and the XR 11002 nozzle for D. insularis. Regarding the efficacy of glufosinate on both weeds, the lower C50 (concentration required for 50% dry weight reduction) were obtained using the XR 11002 nozzle with fine droplets. The TT 11002 nozzle and the AIXR 11002 nozzle showed intermediate C50, making them viable options to reduce spray drift and achieve acceptable weed control. However, the nozzles using extremely coarse (AIXR 110025) and ultra-coarse (TTI 11002) droplet class resulted in higher C50, indicating reduced herbicide efficacy. Our study provided clues on how different spray nozzles and droplet sizes can significantly impact spray deposits and herbicide efficacy on the control of E. heterophylla and D. insularis. Nozzles with fine droplet class generally provided better control, while extremely coarse and ultra-coarse showed reduced efficacy at weed control.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Department of Crop Production College of Agricultural and Technological Science São Paulo State University (UNESP), Rod. Cmte João Ribeiro de Barros, km 65, SPDepartment of Agrarian Science Maringá State University (UEM), PRDepartment of Agrarian Science Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), SPFaculty of Technology (FATEC), SPDepartment of Plant Protection São Paulo State University (UNESP) 18610-034 Botucatu – SPDepartment of Soil Water and Climate Southwest Research and Outreach Center University of Minnesota, 23669, 130th, St.AgroEfetiva Ind. e Serviços LTDA, Distrito Industrial III, SPGraduate Program in Agronomy São Paulo State University (UNESP), SPDepartment of Crop Production College of Agricultural and Technological Science São Paulo State University (UNESP), Rod. Cmte João Ribeiro de Barros, km 65, SPDepartment of Plant Protection São Paulo State University (UNESP) 18610-034 Botucatu – SPGraduate Program in Agronomy São Paulo State University (UNESP), SPFAPESP: 2019/00533-5Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar)Faculty of Technology (FATEC)University of MinnesotaAgroEfetiva Ind. e Serviços LTDAPrado, Evandro P. [UNESP]Guerreiro, Júlio C.Ferreira-Filho, Pedro J.do Nascimento, Vagner [UNESP]Ferrari, Samuel [UNESP]Galindo, Fernando S. [UNESP]Funichello, MarinaRaetano, Carlos G. [UNESP]Pagliari, Paulo H.Chechetto, Rodolfo G.Rodrigues Neto, Arthur D. [UNESP]2025-04-29T18:57:28Z2024-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2023.106560Crop Protection, v. 177.0261-2194https://hdl.handle.net/11449/30118910.1016/j.cropro.2023.1065602-s2.0-85180607167Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengCrop Protectioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2025-04-30T13:36:41Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/301189Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462025-04-30T13:36:41Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Performance of spray nozzles and droplet size on glufosinate deposition and weed biological efficacy |
title |
Performance of spray nozzles and droplet size on glufosinate deposition and weed biological efficacy |
spellingShingle |
Performance of spray nozzles and droplet size on glufosinate deposition and weed biological efficacy Prado, Evandro P. [UNESP] Herbicide dose response Pesticide application technology Spray deposits Weed control |
title_short |
Performance of spray nozzles and droplet size on glufosinate deposition and weed biological efficacy |
title_full |
Performance of spray nozzles and droplet size on glufosinate deposition and weed biological efficacy |
title_fullStr |
Performance of spray nozzles and droplet size on glufosinate deposition and weed biological efficacy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Performance of spray nozzles and droplet size on glufosinate deposition and weed biological efficacy |
title_sort |
Performance of spray nozzles and droplet size on glufosinate deposition and weed biological efficacy |
author |
Prado, Evandro P. [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Prado, Evandro P. [UNESP] Guerreiro, Júlio C. Ferreira-Filho, Pedro J. do Nascimento, Vagner [UNESP] Ferrari, Samuel [UNESP] Galindo, Fernando S. [UNESP] Funichello, Marina Raetano, Carlos G. [UNESP] Pagliari, Paulo H. Chechetto, Rodolfo G. Rodrigues Neto, Arthur D. [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Guerreiro, Júlio C. Ferreira-Filho, Pedro J. do Nascimento, Vagner [UNESP] Ferrari, Samuel [UNESP] Galindo, Fernando S. [UNESP] Funichello, Marina Raetano, Carlos G. [UNESP] Pagliari, Paulo H. Chechetto, Rodolfo G. Rodrigues Neto, Arthur D. [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar) Faculty of Technology (FATEC) University of Minnesota AgroEfetiva Ind. e Serviços LTDA |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Prado, Evandro P. [UNESP] Guerreiro, Júlio C. Ferreira-Filho, Pedro J. do Nascimento, Vagner [UNESP] Ferrari, Samuel [UNESP] Galindo, Fernando S. [UNESP] Funichello, Marina Raetano, Carlos G. [UNESP] Pagliari, Paulo H. Chechetto, Rodolfo G. Rodrigues Neto, Arthur D. [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Herbicide dose response Pesticide application technology Spray deposits Weed control |
topic |
Herbicide dose response Pesticide application technology Spray deposits Weed control |
description |
Nozzle type and droplet size are one of the most important factors that affect spray deposition and the efficacy of herbicides. This study focused on evaluating the performance of spray nozzles and droplet sizes on the deposition of glufosinate and its biological efficacy of two weed species. Treatments consisted of spraying glufosinate on Euphorbia heterophylla and Digitaria insularis by five spray nozzles (XR 11002 – fine droplet; TT 11002 – coarse; AIXR 11002 – very coarse; AIXR 110025 – extremely coarse; and TTI 11002 – ultra coarse) assessing the spray deposits and its influence on plant biomass reduction. The spray deposits on E. heterophylla were found to be similar between most of the spray nozzles, except for the TTI 11002 nozzle, which had lower spray deposits. In contrast, for D. insularis, the spray deposits tended to decrease as the droplet size increased. The spray uniformity was lower for the AIXR 11002 nozzle for E. heterophylla and the XR 11002 nozzle for D. insularis. Regarding the efficacy of glufosinate on both weeds, the lower C50 (concentration required for 50% dry weight reduction) were obtained using the XR 11002 nozzle with fine droplets. The TT 11002 nozzle and the AIXR 11002 nozzle showed intermediate C50, making them viable options to reduce spray drift and achieve acceptable weed control. However, the nozzles using extremely coarse (AIXR 110025) and ultra-coarse (TTI 11002) droplet class resulted in higher C50, indicating reduced herbicide efficacy. Our study provided clues on how different spray nozzles and droplet sizes can significantly impact spray deposits and herbicide efficacy on the control of E. heterophylla and D. insularis. Nozzles with fine droplet class generally provided better control, while extremely coarse and ultra-coarse showed reduced efficacy at weed control. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-03-01 2025-04-29T18:57:28Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2023.106560 Crop Protection, v. 177. 0261-2194 https://hdl.handle.net/11449/301189 10.1016/j.cropro.2023.106560 2-s2.0-85180607167 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2023.106560 https://hdl.handle.net/11449/301189 |
identifier_str_mv |
Crop Protection, v. 177. 0261-2194 10.1016/j.cropro.2023.106560 2-s2.0-85180607167 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Crop Protection |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1834482387700940800 |