Different forms and frequencies of soybean oil supplementation do not alter rumen fermentation in grazing heifers

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Santana, M. C.A. [UNESP]
Publication Date: 2017
Other Authors: Fiorentini, G. [UNESP], Messana, J. D. [UNESP], DIan, P. H.M. [UNESP], Canesin, R. C. [UNESP], Reis, R. A. [UNESP], Berchielli, T. T. [UNESP]
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Download full: http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/AN14608
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/178620
Summary: Over the productive cycle, the performance of cattle in grazing systems may be compromised, and feed supplementation is a strategy to establish nutritional balance and maximise the performance of grazing animals. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of different supplementation frequencies (i.e. daily supplementation (DS) versus Monday, Wednesday and Friday (MWF)) with different forms of soybean oil (i.e. soybean grain (SG), soybean oil (SO) and rumen-protected fat (RPF)) on the nutrient digestion and rumen fermentation of heifers grazing Brachiaria brizantha cv. Marandu pastures. Twelve crossbred heifers (1/4 Nellore × 1/4 Santa Gertrudis × 1/2 Braunvieh) with an initial bodyweight of 236.3 ± 27.6 kg were distributed in a completely randomised design with a factorial arrangement 3 × 2 (three diets and two supplementation frequencies). There was no interaction among the SO form or supplementation frequency on dry matter intake and dry matter digestibility (P > 0.05). The animals supplemented with SG exhibited lower nitrogen intake and absorption compared with animals that were fed SO (P < 0.05). The efficiency of microbial synthesis was not influenced by the diet or supplementation frequency (P > 0.05). Forms of SO affected the rumen pH; animals fed SO showed pH values similar to those of animals receiving SG but lower values than animals fed RPF (P < 0.05). Animals supplemented with DS exhibited higher levels of rumen ammonia nitrogen relative to those supplemented MWF. The reduction of supplementation frequency (from DS to MWF k) in our experimental conditions can be used to increase the efficiency of pasture utilisation without effects in fermentation activity of the rumen microbial population. Supplementation with SO is a strategy to increase propionic acid concentration and reduce A:P ratio, which is an indicator of improvement of the efficiency of the ruminal energy utilisation.
id UNSP_3955accf28f79e63c51df1d6e86c6a9d
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/178620
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Different forms and frequencies of soybean oil supplementation do not alter rumen fermentation in grazing heifersmicrobial synthesisrumen-protected fatsoybean grainvolatile fatty acids.Over the productive cycle, the performance of cattle in grazing systems may be compromised, and feed supplementation is a strategy to establish nutritional balance and maximise the performance of grazing animals. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of different supplementation frequencies (i.e. daily supplementation (DS) versus Monday, Wednesday and Friday (MWF)) with different forms of soybean oil (i.e. soybean grain (SG), soybean oil (SO) and rumen-protected fat (RPF)) on the nutrient digestion and rumen fermentation of heifers grazing Brachiaria brizantha cv. Marandu pastures. Twelve crossbred heifers (1/4 Nellore × 1/4 Santa Gertrudis × 1/2 Braunvieh) with an initial bodyweight of 236.3 ± 27.6 kg were distributed in a completely randomised design with a factorial arrangement 3 × 2 (three diets and two supplementation frequencies). There was no interaction among the SO form or supplementation frequency on dry matter intake and dry matter digestibility (P > 0.05). The animals supplemented with SG exhibited lower nitrogen intake and absorption compared with animals that were fed SO (P < 0.05). The efficiency of microbial synthesis was not influenced by the diet or supplementation frequency (P > 0.05). Forms of SO affected the rumen pH; animals fed SO showed pH values similar to those of animals receiving SG but lower values than animals fed RPF (P < 0.05). Animals supplemented with DS exhibited higher levels of rumen ammonia nitrogen relative to those supplemented MWF. The reduction of supplementation frequency (from DS to MWF k) in our experimental conditions can be used to increase the efficiency of pasture utilisation without effects in fermentation activity of the rumen microbial population. Supplementation with SO is a strategy to increase propionic acid concentration and reduce A:P ratio, which is an indicator of improvement of the efficiency of the ruminal energy utilisation.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)UNESP-Univ. Estadual PaulistaConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e TecnologicoInstituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia-Ciencia AnimalUNESP-Univ. Estadual PaulistaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e TecnologicoInstituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia-Ciencia AnimalSantana, M. C.A. [UNESP]Fiorentini, G. [UNESP]Messana, J. D. [UNESP]DIan, P. H.M. [UNESP]Canesin, R. C. [UNESP]Reis, R. A. [UNESP]Berchielli, T. T. [UNESP]2018-12-11T17:31:21Z2018-12-11T17:31:21Z2017-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article530-538http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/AN14608Animal Production Science, v. 57, n. 3, p. 530-538, 2017.1836-57871836-0939http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17862010.1071/AN146082-s2.0-85011602176Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengAnimal Production Science0,6370,637info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-07T18:39:07Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/178620Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462025-03-28T14:31:06.706894Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Different forms and frequencies of soybean oil supplementation do not alter rumen fermentation in grazing heifers
title Different forms and frequencies of soybean oil supplementation do not alter rumen fermentation in grazing heifers
spellingShingle Different forms and frequencies of soybean oil supplementation do not alter rumen fermentation in grazing heifers
Santana, M. C.A. [UNESP]
microbial synthesis
rumen-protected fat
soybean grain
volatile fatty acids.
title_short Different forms and frequencies of soybean oil supplementation do not alter rumen fermentation in grazing heifers
title_full Different forms and frequencies of soybean oil supplementation do not alter rumen fermentation in grazing heifers
title_fullStr Different forms and frequencies of soybean oil supplementation do not alter rumen fermentation in grazing heifers
title_full_unstemmed Different forms and frequencies of soybean oil supplementation do not alter rumen fermentation in grazing heifers
title_sort Different forms and frequencies of soybean oil supplementation do not alter rumen fermentation in grazing heifers
author Santana, M. C.A. [UNESP]
author_facet Santana, M. C.A. [UNESP]
Fiorentini, G. [UNESP]
Messana, J. D. [UNESP]
DIan, P. H.M. [UNESP]
Canesin, R. C. [UNESP]
Reis, R. A. [UNESP]
Berchielli, T. T. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Fiorentini, G. [UNESP]
Messana, J. D. [UNESP]
DIan, P. H.M. [UNESP]
Canesin, R. C. [UNESP]
Reis, R. A. [UNESP]
Berchielli, T. T. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico
Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia-Ciencia Animal
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santana, M. C.A. [UNESP]
Fiorentini, G. [UNESP]
Messana, J. D. [UNESP]
DIan, P. H.M. [UNESP]
Canesin, R. C. [UNESP]
Reis, R. A. [UNESP]
Berchielli, T. T. [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv microbial synthesis
rumen-protected fat
soybean grain
volatile fatty acids.
topic microbial synthesis
rumen-protected fat
soybean grain
volatile fatty acids.
description Over the productive cycle, the performance of cattle in grazing systems may be compromised, and feed supplementation is a strategy to establish nutritional balance and maximise the performance of grazing animals. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of different supplementation frequencies (i.e. daily supplementation (DS) versus Monday, Wednesday and Friday (MWF)) with different forms of soybean oil (i.e. soybean grain (SG), soybean oil (SO) and rumen-protected fat (RPF)) on the nutrient digestion and rumen fermentation of heifers grazing Brachiaria brizantha cv. Marandu pastures. Twelve crossbred heifers (1/4 Nellore × 1/4 Santa Gertrudis × 1/2 Braunvieh) with an initial bodyweight of 236.3 ± 27.6 kg were distributed in a completely randomised design with a factorial arrangement 3 × 2 (three diets and two supplementation frequencies). There was no interaction among the SO form or supplementation frequency on dry matter intake and dry matter digestibility (P > 0.05). The animals supplemented with SG exhibited lower nitrogen intake and absorption compared with animals that were fed SO (P < 0.05). The efficiency of microbial synthesis was not influenced by the diet or supplementation frequency (P > 0.05). Forms of SO affected the rumen pH; animals fed SO showed pH values similar to those of animals receiving SG but lower values than animals fed RPF (P < 0.05). Animals supplemented with DS exhibited higher levels of rumen ammonia nitrogen relative to those supplemented MWF. The reduction of supplementation frequency (from DS to MWF k) in our experimental conditions can be used to increase the efficiency of pasture utilisation without effects in fermentation activity of the rumen microbial population. Supplementation with SO is a strategy to increase propionic acid concentration and reduce A:P ratio, which is an indicator of improvement of the efficiency of the ruminal energy utilisation.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-01-01
2018-12-11T17:31:21Z
2018-12-11T17:31:21Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/AN14608
Animal Production Science, v. 57, n. 3, p. 530-538, 2017.
1836-5787
1836-0939
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/178620
10.1071/AN14608
2-s2.0-85011602176
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/AN14608
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/178620
identifier_str_mv Animal Production Science, v. 57, n. 3, p. 530-538, 2017.
1836-5787
1836-0939
10.1071/AN14608
2-s2.0-85011602176
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Animal Production Science
0,637
0,637
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 530-538
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1834484843254120448