Resistance-Trained Individuals Can Underestimate the Intensity of the Resistance Training Session: An Analysis Among Sexes, Training Experience, and Exercises

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Santos, Wellington Martins dos
Publication Date: 2022
Other Authors: Tavares Junior, Antonio Carlos [UNESP], Braz, Tiago Volpi, Lopes, Charles Ricardo, Brigatto, Felipe Alves, Santos, Júlio Wilson dos [UNESP]
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Download full: http://dx.doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000003412
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/240183
Summary: Dos Santos, WM, Tavares Junior, AC, Braz, TV, Lopes, CR, Brigatto, FA, and Dos Santos, JW. Resistance-trained individuals can underestimate the intensity of the resistance training session: An analysis among genders, training experience, and exercises. J Strength Cond Res 36(6): 1506-1510, 2022 - Resistance training (RT) promotes improvements in healthy parameters for young to elderly adults and athletes' performance. Strength and muscle mass improvements are dependent on exercise intensity. This study verifies whether 53 healthy young adults underestimate exercise intensity in 3 different exercises, such as bench press (BP), biceps curl (BC), and leg press 45° (LP). Researchers asked the subjects How much load do you use to perform 10 repetitions in this exercise usually in workout routines? in each exercise. Individuals warmed up and then performed as many repetitions as possible until they reached the concentric failure. Deviations from data normality were found by using Levene's test; the number of repetitions per exercise within sex was tested by using Friedman's test and Conover's post hoc and Kruskal-Wallis tests to compare the number of repetitions between sex and RT experience. We correlated the number of repetitions and training experience using the Spearman test. The number of repetitions for both groups (male and female) is greater than 8-12 repetitions for BC and LP and BP of the female group, except for men who perform around 8-12 repetitions on BP. Frequency of maximal repetitions reached for 8-12 repetitions for women was 12% for BP, 28% for BC, and 28% for LP. The frequency men reached was 46.5% for BP, 14.3% for BC, and 14.3% for LP. Training experience did not influence the number of repetitions reached. Resistance training practitioners underestimate exercise load (56% of total sample) to be independent of experience. Women underestimate exercise load more than men. Based on the present results, it is possible to state that RT should not be prescribed considering a predefined number of repetitions and a linked percentage of loads, without the guidance for frequent adjustments of loads, according to the exercise performed.
id UNSP_38ddc554819130df993ba3e368dcdccc
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/240183
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Resistance-Trained Individuals Can Underestimate the Intensity of the Resistance Training Session: An Analysis Among Sexes, Training Experience, and Exercisesloadrepetitionsstrength exercisesDos Santos, WM, Tavares Junior, AC, Braz, TV, Lopes, CR, Brigatto, FA, and Dos Santos, JW. Resistance-trained individuals can underestimate the intensity of the resistance training session: An analysis among genders, training experience, and exercises. J Strength Cond Res 36(6): 1506-1510, 2022 - Resistance training (RT) promotes improvements in healthy parameters for young to elderly adults and athletes' performance. Strength and muscle mass improvements are dependent on exercise intensity. This study verifies whether 53 healthy young adults underestimate exercise intensity in 3 different exercises, such as bench press (BP), biceps curl (BC), and leg press 45° (LP). Researchers asked the subjects How much load do you use to perform 10 repetitions in this exercise usually in workout routines? in each exercise. Individuals warmed up and then performed as many repetitions as possible until they reached the concentric failure. Deviations from data normality were found by using Levene's test; the number of repetitions per exercise within sex was tested by using Friedman's test and Conover's post hoc and Kruskal-Wallis tests to compare the number of repetitions between sex and RT experience. We correlated the number of repetitions and training experience using the Spearman test. The number of repetitions for both groups (male and female) is greater than 8-12 repetitions for BC and LP and BP of the female group, except for men who perform around 8-12 repetitions on BP. Frequency of maximal repetitions reached for 8-12 repetitions for women was 12% for BP, 28% for BC, and 28% for LP. The frequency men reached was 46.5% for BP, 14.3% for BC, and 14.3% for LP. Training experience did not influence the number of repetitions reached. Resistance training practitioners underestimate exercise load (56% of total sample) to be independent of experience. Women underestimate exercise load more than men. Based on the present results, it is possible to state that RT should not be prescribed considering a predefined number of repetitions and a linked percentage of loads, without the guidance for frequent adjustments of loads, according to the exercise performed.Laboratory of Exercise Physiology (FISEX) Faculty of Physical Education University of Campinas (UNICAMP)Laboratory and Research Group on Physiology Applied to Sports Training (FITES) Departament of Physical Education São Paulo State University (UNESP) School of ScienceAnhanguera University CenterMethodist University of Piracicaba Human Performance Research LaboratoryAdventist Faculty of Hortolândia HortolândiaLaboratory and Research Group on Physiology Applied to Sports Training (FITES) Departament of Physical Education São Paulo State University (UNESP) School of ScienceUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Anhanguera University CenterHuman Performance Research LaboratoryHortolândiaSantos, Wellington Martins dosTavares Junior, Antonio Carlos [UNESP]Braz, Tiago VolpiLopes, Charles RicardoBrigatto, Felipe AlvesSantos, Júlio Wilson dos [UNESP]2023-03-01T20:05:16Z2023-03-01T20:05:16Z2022-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article1506-1510http://dx.doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000003412Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, v. 36, n. 6, p. 1506-1510, 2022.1533-42951064-8011http://hdl.handle.net/11449/24018310.1519/JSC.00000000000034122-s2.0-85131304902Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Strength and Conditioning Researchinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-03-01T20:05:17Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/240183Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462025-03-28T14:43:55.352561Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Resistance-Trained Individuals Can Underestimate the Intensity of the Resistance Training Session: An Analysis Among Sexes, Training Experience, and Exercises
title Resistance-Trained Individuals Can Underestimate the Intensity of the Resistance Training Session: An Analysis Among Sexes, Training Experience, and Exercises
spellingShingle Resistance-Trained Individuals Can Underestimate the Intensity of the Resistance Training Session: An Analysis Among Sexes, Training Experience, and Exercises
Santos, Wellington Martins dos
load
repetitions
strength exercises
title_short Resistance-Trained Individuals Can Underestimate the Intensity of the Resistance Training Session: An Analysis Among Sexes, Training Experience, and Exercises
title_full Resistance-Trained Individuals Can Underestimate the Intensity of the Resistance Training Session: An Analysis Among Sexes, Training Experience, and Exercises
title_fullStr Resistance-Trained Individuals Can Underestimate the Intensity of the Resistance Training Session: An Analysis Among Sexes, Training Experience, and Exercises
title_full_unstemmed Resistance-Trained Individuals Can Underestimate the Intensity of the Resistance Training Session: An Analysis Among Sexes, Training Experience, and Exercises
title_sort Resistance-Trained Individuals Can Underestimate the Intensity of the Resistance Training Session: An Analysis Among Sexes, Training Experience, and Exercises
author Santos, Wellington Martins dos
author_facet Santos, Wellington Martins dos
Tavares Junior, Antonio Carlos [UNESP]
Braz, Tiago Volpi
Lopes, Charles Ricardo
Brigatto, Felipe Alves
Santos, Júlio Wilson dos [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Tavares Junior, Antonio Carlos [UNESP]
Braz, Tiago Volpi
Lopes, Charles Ricardo
Brigatto, Felipe Alves
Santos, Júlio Wilson dos [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Anhanguera University Center
Human Performance Research Laboratory
Hortolândia
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos, Wellington Martins dos
Tavares Junior, Antonio Carlos [UNESP]
Braz, Tiago Volpi
Lopes, Charles Ricardo
Brigatto, Felipe Alves
Santos, Júlio Wilson dos [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv load
repetitions
strength exercises
topic load
repetitions
strength exercises
description Dos Santos, WM, Tavares Junior, AC, Braz, TV, Lopes, CR, Brigatto, FA, and Dos Santos, JW. Resistance-trained individuals can underestimate the intensity of the resistance training session: An analysis among genders, training experience, and exercises. J Strength Cond Res 36(6): 1506-1510, 2022 - Resistance training (RT) promotes improvements in healthy parameters for young to elderly adults and athletes' performance. Strength and muscle mass improvements are dependent on exercise intensity. This study verifies whether 53 healthy young adults underestimate exercise intensity in 3 different exercises, such as bench press (BP), biceps curl (BC), and leg press 45° (LP). Researchers asked the subjects How much load do you use to perform 10 repetitions in this exercise usually in workout routines? in each exercise. Individuals warmed up and then performed as many repetitions as possible until they reached the concentric failure. Deviations from data normality were found by using Levene's test; the number of repetitions per exercise within sex was tested by using Friedman's test and Conover's post hoc and Kruskal-Wallis tests to compare the number of repetitions between sex and RT experience. We correlated the number of repetitions and training experience using the Spearman test. The number of repetitions for both groups (male and female) is greater than 8-12 repetitions for BC and LP and BP of the female group, except for men who perform around 8-12 repetitions on BP. Frequency of maximal repetitions reached for 8-12 repetitions for women was 12% for BP, 28% for BC, and 28% for LP. The frequency men reached was 46.5% for BP, 14.3% for BC, and 14.3% for LP. Training experience did not influence the number of repetitions reached. Resistance training practitioners underestimate exercise load (56% of total sample) to be independent of experience. Women underestimate exercise load more than men. Based on the present results, it is possible to state that RT should not be prescribed considering a predefined number of repetitions and a linked percentage of loads, without the guidance for frequent adjustments of loads, according to the exercise performed.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-06-01
2023-03-01T20:05:16Z
2023-03-01T20:05:16Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000003412
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, v. 36, n. 6, p. 1506-1510, 2022.
1533-4295
1064-8011
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/240183
10.1519/JSC.0000000000003412
2-s2.0-85131304902
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000003412
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/240183
identifier_str_mv Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, v. 36, n. 6, p. 1506-1510, 2022.
1533-4295
1064-8011
10.1519/JSC.0000000000003412
2-s2.0-85131304902
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 1506-1510
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1834482980024745984