Resistance-Trained Individuals Can Underestimate the Intensity of the Resistance Training Session: An Analysis Among Sexes, Training Experience, and Exercises
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2022 |
Other Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Download full: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000003412 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/240183 |
Summary: | Dos Santos, WM, Tavares Junior, AC, Braz, TV, Lopes, CR, Brigatto, FA, and Dos Santos, JW. Resistance-trained individuals can underestimate the intensity of the resistance training session: An analysis among genders, training experience, and exercises. J Strength Cond Res 36(6): 1506-1510, 2022 - Resistance training (RT) promotes improvements in healthy parameters for young to elderly adults and athletes' performance. Strength and muscle mass improvements are dependent on exercise intensity. This study verifies whether 53 healthy young adults underestimate exercise intensity in 3 different exercises, such as bench press (BP), biceps curl (BC), and leg press 45° (LP). Researchers asked the subjects How much load do you use to perform 10 repetitions in this exercise usually in workout routines? in each exercise. Individuals warmed up and then performed as many repetitions as possible until they reached the concentric failure. Deviations from data normality were found by using Levene's test; the number of repetitions per exercise within sex was tested by using Friedman's test and Conover's post hoc and Kruskal-Wallis tests to compare the number of repetitions between sex and RT experience. We correlated the number of repetitions and training experience using the Spearman test. The number of repetitions for both groups (male and female) is greater than 8-12 repetitions for BC and LP and BP of the female group, except for men who perform around 8-12 repetitions on BP. Frequency of maximal repetitions reached for 8-12 repetitions for women was 12% for BP, 28% for BC, and 28% for LP. The frequency men reached was 46.5% for BP, 14.3% for BC, and 14.3% for LP. Training experience did not influence the number of repetitions reached. Resistance training practitioners underestimate exercise load (56% of total sample) to be independent of experience. Women underestimate exercise load more than men. Based on the present results, it is possible to state that RT should not be prescribed considering a predefined number of repetitions and a linked percentage of loads, without the guidance for frequent adjustments of loads, according to the exercise performed. |
id |
UNSP_38ddc554819130df993ba3e368dcdccc |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/240183 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Resistance-Trained Individuals Can Underestimate the Intensity of the Resistance Training Session: An Analysis Among Sexes, Training Experience, and Exercisesloadrepetitionsstrength exercisesDos Santos, WM, Tavares Junior, AC, Braz, TV, Lopes, CR, Brigatto, FA, and Dos Santos, JW. Resistance-trained individuals can underestimate the intensity of the resistance training session: An analysis among genders, training experience, and exercises. J Strength Cond Res 36(6): 1506-1510, 2022 - Resistance training (RT) promotes improvements in healthy parameters for young to elderly adults and athletes' performance. Strength and muscle mass improvements are dependent on exercise intensity. This study verifies whether 53 healthy young adults underestimate exercise intensity in 3 different exercises, such as bench press (BP), biceps curl (BC), and leg press 45° (LP). Researchers asked the subjects How much load do you use to perform 10 repetitions in this exercise usually in workout routines? in each exercise. Individuals warmed up and then performed as many repetitions as possible until they reached the concentric failure. Deviations from data normality were found by using Levene's test; the number of repetitions per exercise within sex was tested by using Friedman's test and Conover's post hoc and Kruskal-Wallis tests to compare the number of repetitions between sex and RT experience. We correlated the number of repetitions and training experience using the Spearman test. The number of repetitions for both groups (male and female) is greater than 8-12 repetitions for BC and LP and BP of the female group, except for men who perform around 8-12 repetitions on BP. Frequency of maximal repetitions reached for 8-12 repetitions for women was 12% for BP, 28% for BC, and 28% for LP. The frequency men reached was 46.5% for BP, 14.3% for BC, and 14.3% for LP. Training experience did not influence the number of repetitions reached. Resistance training practitioners underestimate exercise load (56% of total sample) to be independent of experience. Women underestimate exercise load more than men. Based on the present results, it is possible to state that RT should not be prescribed considering a predefined number of repetitions and a linked percentage of loads, without the guidance for frequent adjustments of loads, according to the exercise performed.Laboratory of Exercise Physiology (FISEX) Faculty of Physical Education University of Campinas (UNICAMP)Laboratory and Research Group on Physiology Applied to Sports Training (FITES) Departament of Physical Education São Paulo State University (UNESP) School of ScienceAnhanguera University CenterMethodist University of Piracicaba Human Performance Research LaboratoryAdventist Faculty of Hortolândia HortolândiaLaboratory and Research Group on Physiology Applied to Sports Training (FITES) Departament of Physical Education São Paulo State University (UNESP) School of ScienceUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Anhanguera University CenterHuman Performance Research LaboratoryHortolândiaSantos, Wellington Martins dosTavares Junior, Antonio Carlos [UNESP]Braz, Tiago VolpiLopes, Charles RicardoBrigatto, Felipe AlvesSantos, Júlio Wilson dos [UNESP]2023-03-01T20:05:16Z2023-03-01T20:05:16Z2022-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article1506-1510http://dx.doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000003412Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, v. 36, n. 6, p. 1506-1510, 2022.1533-42951064-8011http://hdl.handle.net/11449/24018310.1519/JSC.00000000000034122-s2.0-85131304902Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Strength and Conditioning Researchinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-03-01T20:05:17Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/240183Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462025-03-28T14:43:55.352561Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Resistance-Trained Individuals Can Underestimate the Intensity of the Resistance Training Session: An Analysis Among Sexes, Training Experience, and Exercises |
title |
Resistance-Trained Individuals Can Underestimate the Intensity of the Resistance Training Session: An Analysis Among Sexes, Training Experience, and Exercises |
spellingShingle |
Resistance-Trained Individuals Can Underestimate the Intensity of the Resistance Training Session: An Analysis Among Sexes, Training Experience, and Exercises Santos, Wellington Martins dos load repetitions strength exercises |
title_short |
Resistance-Trained Individuals Can Underestimate the Intensity of the Resistance Training Session: An Analysis Among Sexes, Training Experience, and Exercises |
title_full |
Resistance-Trained Individuals Can Underestimate the Intensity of the Resistance Training Session: An Analysis Among Sexes, Training Experience, and Exercises |
title_fullStr |
Resistance-Trained Individuals Can Underestimate the Intensity of the Resistance Training Session: An Analysis Among Sexes, Training Experience, and Exercises |
title_full_unstemmed |
Resistance-Trained Individuals Can Underestimate the Intensity of the Resistance Training Session: An Analysis Among Sexes, Training Experience, and Exercises |
title_sort |
Resistance-Trained Individuals Can Underestimate the Intensity of the Resistance Training Session: An Analysis Among Sexes, Training Experience, and Exercises |
author |
Santos, Wellington Martins dos |
author_facet |
Santos, Wellington Martins dos Tavares Junior, Antonio Carlos [UNESP] Braz, Tiago Volpi Lopes, Charles Ricardo Brigatto, Felipe Alves Santos, Júlio Wilson dos [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Tavares Junior, Antonio Carlos [UNESP] Braz, Tiago Volpi Lopes, Charles Ricardo Brigatto, Felipe Alves Santos, Júlio Wilson dos [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Anhanguera University Center Human Performance Research Laboratory Hortolândia |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santos, Wellington Martins dos Tavares Junior, Antonio Carlos [UNESP] Braz, Tiago Volpi Lopes, Charles Ricardo Brigatto, Felipe Alves Santos, Júlio Wilson dos [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
load repetitions strength exercises |
topic |
load repetitions strength exercises |
description |
Dos Santos, WM, Tavares Junior, AC, Braz, TV, Lopes, CR, Brigatto, FA, and Dos Santos, JW. Resistance-trained individuals can underestimate the intensity of the resistance training session: An analysis among genders, training experience, and exercises. J Strength Cond Res 36(6): 1506-1510, 2022 - Resistance training (RT) promotes improvements in healthy parameters for young to elderly adults and athletes' performance. Strength and muscle mass improvements are dependent on exercise intensity. This study verifies whether 53 healthy young adults underestimate exercise intensity in 3 different exercises, such as bench press (BP), biceps curl (BC), and leg press 45° (LP). Researchers asked the subjects How much load do you use to perform 10 repetitions in this exercise usually in workout routines? in each exercise. Individuals warmed up and then performed as many repetitions as possible until they reached the concentric failure. Deviations from data normality were found by using Levene's test; the number of repetitions per exercise within sex was tested by using Friedman's test and Conover's post hoc and Kruskal-Wallis tests to compare the number of repetitions between sex and RT experience. We correlated the number of repetitions and training experience using the Spearman test. The number of repetitions for both groups (male and female) is greater than 8-12 repetitions for BC and LP and BP of the female group, except for men who perform around 8-12 repetitions on BP. Frequency of maximal repetitions reached for 8-12 repetitions for women was 12% for BP, 28% for BC, and 28% for LP. The frequency men reached was 46.5% for BP, 14.3% for BC, and 14.3% for LP. Training experience did not influence the number of repetitions reached. Resistance training practitioners underestimate exercise load (56% of total sample) to be independent of experience. Women underestimate exercise load more than men. Based on the present results, it is possible to state that RT should not be prescribed considering a predefined number of repetitions and a linked percentage of loads, without the guidance for frequent adjustments of loads, according to the exercise performed. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-06-01 2023-03-01T20:05:16Z 2023-03-01T20:05:16Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000003412 Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, v. 36, n. 6, p. 1506-1510, 2022. 1533-4295 1064-8011 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/240183 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003412 2-s2.0-85131304902 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000003412 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/240183 |
identifier_str_mv |
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, v. 36, n. 6, p. 1506-1510, 2022. 1533-4295 1064-8011 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003412 2-s2.0-85131304902 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
1506-1510 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1834482980024745984 |