Planting season alters the interference of weeds in the common bean
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2023 |
Other Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Download full: | http://dx.doi.org/10.21475/ajcs.23.17.12.p3922 https://hdl.handle.net/11449/300113 |
Summary: | The common bean has social, economic, culinary, and environmental relevance. Considering its low competitive capacity and the intensive use of herbicides, methods such as planting time can help in weed management. To determine the effect of the planting season on controlling weeds affecting common beans, an experiment was conducted during the summer planting and another in winter planting. For that seven incrementing periods were implemented: 0–10, 0–20, 0–30, 0–40, 0–50, 0–60 and 0–80 days after bean emergence with coexistence of weeds and the same periods with control of weeds, which established 14 treatments in four repetitions, under a random block design. Weeds were analyzed using a phytosociological method and their dry mass with yield examined by regression. The non-linear regression analysis determined the pre-interference period (PIP), the critical period for interference prevention (CPIP) and the total interference prevention period (TIP). The relevant species were Nicandra physaloides, Digitaria nuda and Raphanus raphanistrum. The TIP was similar in both planting seasons. The CPIP was 38 and 33 days in summer planting and winter planting, respectively. The PIP had six more days in winter planting compared to summer planting. The higher dry mass in weeds reduced yield by 14.7 % in winter planting, in relation to the summer planting, but the reduction was faster in this season. Winter planting conferred a certain competitive advantage to the crop over some weed species, thus it could be suggested planting common bean in that season. |
id |
UNSP_372696dcdce8e535947b17a15629f77d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/300113 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Planting season alters the interference of weeds in the common beancompetitioninterference periodsPhaseolus vulgaris L.phytosociologysustainable weed managementThe common bean has social, economic, culinary, and environmental relevance. Considering its low competitive capacity and the intensive use of herbicides, methods such as planting time can help in weed management. To determine the effect of the planting season on controlling weeds affecting common beans, an experiment was conducted during the summer planting and another in winter planting. For that seven incrementing periods were implemented: 0–10, 0–20, 0–30, 0–40, 0–50, 0–60 and 0–80 days after bean emergence with coexistence of weeds and the same periods with control of weeds, which established 14 treatments in four repetitions, under a random block design. Weeds were analyzed using a phytosociological method and their dry mass with yield examined by regression. The non-linear regression analysis determined the pre-interference period (PIP), the critical period for interference prevention (CPIP) and the total interference prevention period (TIP). The relevant species were Nicandra physaloides, Digitaria nuda and Raphanus raphanistrum. The TIP was similar in both planting seasons. The CPIP was 38 and 33 days in summer planting and winter planting, respectively. The PIP had six more days in winter planting compared to summer planting. The higher dry mass in weeds reduced yield by 14.7 % in winter planting, in relation to the summer planting, but the reduction was faster in this season. Winter planting conferred a certain competitive advantage to the crop over some weed species, thus it could be suggested planting common bean in that season.Department of Biology São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal, SP, CEPDepartment of Plant Production São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal, SP, CEPDepartment of Plant Production National Agrarian University La Molina, CEPDepartment of Biology São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal, SP, CEPDepartment of Plant Production São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal, SP, CEPUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)National Agrarian University La MolinaTejada, Jorge Luis [UNESP]Lemos, Leandro Borges [UNESP]Silva, Ebson [UNESP]Alves, Pedro Luís da Costa Aguiar [UNESP]2025-04-29T18:48:37Z2023-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article902-909http://dx.doi.org/10.21475/ajcs.23.17.12.p3922Australian Journal of Crop Science, v. 17, n. 12, p. 902-909, 2023.1835-27071835-2693https://hdl.handle.net/11449/30011310.21475/ajcs.23.17.12.p39222-s2.0-85186890709Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengAustralian Journal of Crop Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2025-04-30T13:41:50Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/300113Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462025-04-30T13:41:50Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Planting season alters the interference of weeds in the common bean |
title |
Planting season alters the interference of weeds in the common bean |
spellingShingle |
Planting season alters the interference of weeds in the common bean Tejada, Jorge Luis [UNESP] competition interference periods Phaseolus vulgaris L. phytosociology sustainable weed management |
title_short |
Planting season alters the interference of weeds in the common bean |
title_full |
Planting season alters the interference of weeds in the common bean |
title_fullStr |
Planting season alters the interference of weeds in the common bean |
title_full_unstemmed |
Planting season alters the interference of weeds in the common bean |
title_sort |
Planting season alters the interference of weeds in the common bean |
author |
Tejada, Jorge Luis [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Tejada, Jorge Luis [UNESP] Lemos, Leandro Borges [UNESP] Silva, Ebson [UNESP] Alves, Pedro Luís da Costa Aguiar [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lemos, Leandro Borges [UNESP] Silva, Ebson [UNESP] Alves, Pedro Luís da Costa Aguiar [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) National Agrarian University La Molina |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Tejada, Jorge Luis [UNESP] Lemos, Leandro Borges [UNESP] Silva, Ebson [UNESP] Alves, Pedro Luís da Costa Aguiar [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
competition interference periods Phaseolus vulgaris L. phytosociology sustainable weed management |
topic |
competition interference periods Phaseolus vulgaris L. phytosociology sustainable weed management |
description |
The common bean has social, economic, culinary, and environmental relevance. Considering its low competitive capacity and the intensive use of herbicides, methods such as planting time can help in weed management. To determine the effect of the planting season on controlling weeds affecting common beans, an experiment was conducted during the summer planting and another in winter planting. For that seven incrementing periods were implemented: 0–10, 0–20, 0–30, 0–40, 0–50, 0–60 and 0–80 days after bean emergence with coexistence of weeds and the same periods with control of weeds, which established 14 treatments in four repetitions, under a random block design. Weeds were analyzed using a phytosociological method and their dry mass with yield examined by regression. The non-linear regression analysis determined the pre-interference period (PIP), the critical period for interference prevention (CPIP) and the total interference prevention period (TIP). The relevant species were Nicandra physaloides, Digitaria nuda and Raphanus raphanistrum. The TIP was similar in both planting seasons. The CPIP was 38 and 33 days in summer planting and winter planting, respectively. The PIP had six more days in winter planting compared to summer planting. The higher dry mass in weeds reduced yield by 14.7 % in winter planting, in relation to the summer planting, but the reduction was faster in this season. Winter planting conferred a certain competitive advantage to the crop over some weed species, thus it could be suggested planting common bean in that season. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-01-01 2025-04-29T18:48:37Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.21475/ajcs.23.17.12.p3922 Australian Journal of Crop Science, v. 17, n. 12, p. 902-909, 2023. 1835-2707 1835-2693 https://hdl.handle.net/11449/300113 10.21475/ajcs.23.17.12.p3922 2-s2.0-85186890709 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.21475/ajcs.23.17.12.p3922 https://hdl.handle.net/11449/300113 |
identifier_str_mv |
Australian Journal of Crop Science, v. 17, n. 12, p. 902-909, 2023. 1835-2707 1835-2693 10.21475/ajcs.23.17.12.p3922 2-s2.0-85186890709 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Australian Journal of Crop Science |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
902-909 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1834482654847696896 |