Planting season alters the interference of weeds in the common bean

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tejada, Jorge Luis [UNESP]
Publication Date: 2023
Other Authors: Lemos, Leandro Borges [UNESP], Silva, Ebson [UNESP], Alves, Pedro Luís da Costa Aguiar [UNESP]
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Download full: http://dx.doi.org/10.21475/ajcs.23.17.12.p3922
https://hdl.handle.net/11449/300113
Summary: The common bean has social, economic, culinary, and environmental relevance. Considering its low competitive capacity and the intensive use of herbicides, methods such as planting time can help in weed management. To determine the effect of the planting season on controlling weeds affecting common beans, an experiment was conducted during the summer planting and another in winter planting. For that seven incrementing periods were implemented: 0–10, 0–20, 0–30, 0–40, 0–50, 0–60 and 0–80 days after bean emergence with coexistence of weeds and the same periods with control of weeds, which established 14 treatments in four repetitions, under a random block design. Weeds were analyzed using a phytosociological method and their dry mass with yield examined by regression. The non-linear regression analysis determined the pre-interference period (PIP), the critical period for interference prevention (CPIP) and the total interference prevention period (TIP). The relevant species were Nicandra physaloides, Digitaria nuda and Raphanus raphanistrum. The TIP was similar in both planting seasons. The CPIP was 38 and 33 days in summer planting and winter planting, respectively. The PIP had six more days in winter planting compared to summer planting. The higher dry mass in weeds reduced yield by 14.7 % in winter planting, in relation to the summer planting, but the reduction was faster in this season. Winter planting conferred a certain competitive advantage to the crop over some weed species, thus it could be suggested planting common bean in that season.
id UNSP_372696dcdce8e535947b17a15629f77d
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/300113
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Planting season alters the interference of weeds in the common beancompetitioninterference periodsPhaseolus vulgaris L.phytosociologysustainable weed managementThe common bean has social, economic, culinary, and environmental relevance. Considering its low competitive capacity and the intensive use of herbicides, methods such as planting time can help in weed management. To determine the effect of the planting season on controlling weeds affecting common beans, an experiment was conducted during the summer planting and another in winter planting. For that seven incrementing periods were implemented: 0–10, 0–20, 0–30, 0–40, 0–50, 0–60 and 0–80 days after bean emergence with coexistence of weeds and the same periods with control of weeds, which established 14 treatments in four repetitions, under a random block design. Weeds were analyzed using a phytosociological method and their dry mass with yield examined by regression. The non-linear regression analysis determined the pre-interference period (PIP), the critical period for interference prevention (CPIP) and the total interference prevention period (TIP). The relevant species were Nicandra physaloides, Digitaria nuda and Raphanus raphanistrum. The TIP was similar in both planting seasons. The CPIP was 38 and 33 days in summer planting and winter planting, respectively. The PIP had six more days in winter planting compared to summer planting. The higher dry mass in weeds reduced yield by 14.7 % in winter planting, in relation to the summer planting, but the reduction was faster in this season. Winter planting conferred a certain competitive advantage to the crop over some weed species, thus it could be suggested planting common bean in that season.Department of Biology São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal, SP, CEPDepartment of Plant Production São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal, SP, CEPDepartment of Plant Production National Agrarian University La Molina, CEPDepartment of Biology São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal, SP, CEPDepartment of Plant Production São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal, SP, CEPUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)National Agrarian University La MolinaTejada, Jorge Luis [UNESP]Lemos, Leandro Borges [UNESP]Silva, Ebson [UNESP]Alves, Pedro Luís da Costa Aguiar [UNESP]2025-04-29T18:48:37Z2023-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article902-909http://dx.doi.org/10.21475/ajcs.23.17.12.p3922Australian Journal of Crop Science, v. 17, n. 12, p. 902-909, 2023.1835-27071835-2693https://hdl.handle.net/11449/30011310.21475/ajcs.23.17.12.p39222-s2.0-85186890709Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengAustralian Journal of Crop Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2025-04-30T13:41:50Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/300113Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462025-04-30T13:41:50Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Planting season alters the interference of weeds in the common bean
title Planting season alters the interference of weeds in the common bean
spellingShingle Planting season alters the interference of weeds in the common bean
Tejada, Jorge Luis [UNESP]
competition
interference periods
Phaseolus vulgaris L.
phytosociology
sustainable weed management
title_short Planting season alters the interference of weeds in the common bean
title_full Planting season alters the interference of weeds in the common bean
title_fullStr Planting season alters the interference of weeds in the common bean
title_full_unstemmed Planting season alters the interference of weeds in the common bean
title_sort Planting season alters the interference of weeds in the common bean
author Tejada, Jorge Luis [UNESP]
author_facet Tejada, Jorge Luis [UNESP]
Lemos, Leandro Borges [UNESP]
Silva, Ebson [UNESP]
Alves, Pedro Luís da Costa Aguiar [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Lemos, Leandro Borges [UNESP]
Silva, Ebson [UNESP]
Alves, Pedro Luís da Costa Aguiar [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
National Agrarian University La Molina
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Tejada, Jorge Luis [UNESP]
Lemos, Leandro Borges [UNESP]
Silva, Ebson [UNESP]
Alves, Pedro Luís da Costa Aguiar [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv competition
interference periods
Phaseolus vulgaris L.
phytosociology
sustainable weed management
topic competition
interference periods
Phaseolus vulgaris L.
phytosociology
sustainable weed management
description The common bean has social, economic, culinary, and environmental relevance. Considering its low competitive capacity and the intensive use of herbicides, methods such as planting time can help in weed management. To determine the effect of the planting season on controlling weeds affecting common beans, an experiment was conducted during the summer planting and another in winter planting. For that seven incrementing periods were implemented: 0–10, 0–20, 0–30, 0–40, 0–50, 0–60 and 0–80 days after bean emergence with coexistence of weeds and the same periods with control of weeds, which established 14 treatments in four repetitions, under a random block design. Weeds were analyzed using a phytosociological method and their dry mass with yield examined by regression. The non-linear regression analysis determined the pre-interference period (PIP), the critical period for interference prevention (CPIP) and the total interference prevention period (TIP). The relevant species were Nicandra physaloides, Digitaria nuda and Raphanus raphanistrum. The TIP was similar in both planting seasons. The CPIP was 38 and 33 days in summer planting and winter planting, respectively. The PIP had six more days in winter planting compared to summer planting. The higher dry mass in weeds reduced yield by 14.7 % in winter planting, in relation to the summer planting, but the reduction was faster in this season. Winter planting conferred a certain competitive advantage to the crop over some weed species, thus it could be suggested planting common bean in that season.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-01-01
2025-04-29T18:48:37Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.21475/ajcs.23.17.12.p3922
Australian Journal of Crop Science, v. 17, n. 12, p. 902-909, 2023.
1835-2707
1835-2693
https://hdl.handle.net/11449/300113
10.21475/ajcs.23.17.12.p3922
2-s2.0-85186890709
url http://dx.doi.org/10.21475/ajcs.23.17.12.p3922
https://hdl.handle.net/11449/300113
identifier_str_mv Australian Journal of Crop Science, v. 17, n. 12, p. 902-909, 2023.
1835-2707
1835-2693
10.21475/ajcs.23.17.12.p3922
2-s2.0-85186890709
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Australian Journal of Crop Science
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 902-909
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1834482654847696896