How do imaging protocols affect the assessment of root-end fillings?
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2022 |
Other Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Download full: | http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/rde.2022.47.e2 https://hdl.handle.net/11449/303391 |
Summary: | Objectives: This study investigated the impact of micro-computed tomography (micro-CT)-based voxel size on the analysis of material/dentin interface voids and thickness of different endodontic cements. Materials and Methods: Following root-end resection and apical preparation, maxillary premolars were filled with mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), Biodentine, and intermediate restorative material (IRM) (n = 24). The samples were scanned using micro- CT (SkyScan 1272; Bruker) and the cement/dentin interface and thickness of materials were evaluated at voxel sizes of 5, 10, and 20 mu m. Analysis of variance and the Tukey test were conducted, and the degree of agreement between different voxel sizes was evaluated using the Bland and Altman method (p < 0.05). Results: All materials showed an increase in thickness from 5 to 10 and 20 mu m (p < 0.05). When evaluating the interface voids, materials were similar at 5 mu m (p > 0.05), while at 10 and 20 mu m Biodentine showed the lowest percentage of voids (p < 0.05). A decrease in the interface voids was observed for MTA and IRM at 20 mu m, while Biodentine showed differences among all voxel sizes (p < 0.05). The Bland-Altman plots for comparisons among voxel sizes showed the largest deviations when comparing images between 5 and 20 mu m. Conclusions: Voxel size had an impact on the micro-CT evaluation of thickness and interface voids of endodontic materials. All cements exhibited an increase in thickness and a decrease in the void percentage as the voxel size increased, especially when evaluating images at 20 mu m. |
id |
UNSP_297ff0de42018f04b592fcbc117d9dbd |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/303391 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
How do imaging protocols affect the assessment of root-end fillings?Dental materialsEndodonticsMethodsX-ray microtomographyObjectives: This study investigated the impact of micro-computed tomography (micro-CT)-based voxel size on the analysis of material/dentin interface voids and thickness of different endodontic cements. Materials and Methods: Following root-end resection and apical preparation, maxillary premolars were filled with mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), Biodentine, and intermediate restorative material (IRM) (n = 24). The samples were scanned using micro- CT (SkyScan 1272; Bruker) and the cement/dentin interface and thickness of materials were evaluated at voxel sizes of 5, 10, and 20 mu m. Analysis of variance and the Tukey test were conducted, and the degree of agreement between different voxel sizes was evaluated using the Bland and Altman method (p < 0.05). Results: All materials showed an increase in thickness from 5 to 10 and 20 mu m (p < 0.05). When evaluating the interface voids, materials were similar at 5 mu m (p > 0.05), while at 10 and 20 mu m Biodentine showed the lowest percentage of voids (p < 0.05). A decrease in the interface voids was observed for MTA and IRM at 20 mu m, while Biodentine showed differences among all voxel sizes (p < 0.05). The Bland-Altman plots for comparisons among voxel sizes showed the largest deviations when comparing images between 5 and 20 mu m. Conclusions: Voxel size had an impact on the micro-CT evaluation of thickness and interface voids of endodontic materials. All cements exhibited an increase in thickness and a decrease in the void percentage as the voxel size increased, especially when evaluating images at 20 mu m.Sao Paulo State Univ UNESP, Sch Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, Rua Humaita 1680, BR-14801903 Araraquara, SP, BrazilKatholieke Univ Leuven, Fac Med, Dept Imaging & Pathol, OMFS IMPATH Res Grp, Leuven, BelgiumUniv Hosp Leuven, Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Leuven, BelgiumKarolinska Inst, Dept Dent Med, Stockholm, SwedenFed Univ Rio de Janeiro UFRJ, Dept Nucl Energy, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ UNESP, Sch Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, Rua Humaita 1680, BR-14801903 Araraquara, SP, BrazilKorean Acad Conservative DentistryUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Katholieke Univ LeuvenUniv Hosp LeuvenKarolinska InstUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)Esteves Torres, Fernanda Ferrari [UNESP]Jacobs, ReinhildeEzEldeen, MostafaFaria-Vasconcelos, Karla deGuerreiro-Tanomaru, Juliane Maria [UNESP]Santos, Bernardo Camargo dosTanomaru-Filho, Mario [UNESP]2025-04-29T19:29:29Z2022-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article11http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/rde.2022.47.e2Restorative Dentistry And Endodontics. Seoul: Korean Acad Conservative Dentistry, v. 47, n. 1, 11 p., 2022.2234-7658https://hdl.handle.net/11449/30339110.5395/rde.2022.47.e2WOS:001184636000002Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengRestorative Dentistry And Endodonticsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2025-05-01T06:01:31Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/303391Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462025-05-01T06:01:31Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
How do imaging protocols affect the assessment of root-end fillings? |
title |
How do imaging protocols affect the assessment of root-end fillings? |
spellingShingle |
How do imaging protocols affect the assessment of root-end fillings? Esteves Torres, Fernanda Ferrari [UNESP] Dental materials Endodontics Methods X-ray microtomography |
title_short |
How do imaging protocols affect the assessment of root-end fillings? |
title_full |
How do imaging protocols affect the assessment of root-end fillings? |
title_fullStr |
How do imaging protocols affect the assessment of root-end fillings? |
title_full_unstemmed |
How do imaging protocols affect the assessment of root-end fillings? |
title_sort |
How do imaging protocols affect the assessment of root-end fillings? |
author |
Esteves Torres, Fernanda Ferrari [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Esteves Torres, Fernanda Ferrari [UNESP] Jacobs, Reinhilde EzEldeen, Mostafa Faria-Vasconcelos, Karla de Guerreiro-Tanomaru, Juliane Maria [UNESP] Santos, Bernardo Camargo dos Tanomaru-Filho, Mario [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Jacobs, Reinhilde EzEldeen, Mostafa Faria-Vasconcelos, Karla de Guerreiro-Tanomaru, Juliane Maria [UNESP] Santos, Bernardo Camargo dos Tanomaru-Filho, Mario [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Katholieke Univ Leuven Univ Hosp Leuven Karolinska Inst Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Esteves Torres, Fernanda Ferrari [UNESP] Jacobs, Reinhilde EzEldeen, Mostafa Faria-Vasconcelos, Karla de Guerreiro-Tanomaru, Juliane Maria [UNESP] Santos, Bernardo Camargo dos Tanomaru-Filho, Mario [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Dental materials Endodontics Methods X-ray microtomography |
topic |
Dental materials Endodontics Methods X-ray microtomography |
description |
Objectives: This study investigated the impact of micro-computed tomography (micro-CT)-based voxel size on the analysis of material/dentin interface voids and thickness of different endodontic cements. Materials and Methods: Following root-end resection and apical preparation, maxillary premolars were filled with mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), Biodentine, and intermediate restorative material (IRM) (n = 24). The samples were scanned using micro- CT (SkyScan 1272; Bruker) and the cement/dentin interface and thickness of materials were evaluated at voxel sizes of 5, 10, and 20 mu m. Analysis of variance and the Tukey test were conducted, and the degree of agreement between different voxel sizes was evaluated using the Bland and Altman method (p < 0.05). Results: All materials showed an increase in thickness from 5 to 10 and 20 mu m (p < 0.05). When evaluating the interface voids, materials were similar at 5 mu m (p > 0.05), while at 10 and 20 mu m Biodentine showed the lowest percentage of voids (p < 0.05). A decrease in the interface voids was observed for MTA and IRM at 20 mu m, while Biodentine showed differences among all voxel sizes (p < 0.05). The Bland-Altman plots for comparisons among voxel sizes showed the largest deviations when comparing images between 5 and 20 mu m. Conclusions: Voxel size had an impact on the micro-CT evaluation of thickness and interface voids of endodontic materials. All cements exhibited an increase in thickness and a decrease in the void percentage as the voxel size increased, especially when evaluating images at 20 mu m. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-02-01 2025-04-29T19:29:29Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/rde.2022.47.e2 Restorative Dentistry And Endodontics. Seoul: Korean Acad Conservative Dentistry, v. 47, n. 1, 11 p., 2022. 2234-7658 https://hdl.handle.net/11449/303391 10.5395/rde.2022.47.e2 WOS:001184636000002 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/rde.2022.47.e2 https://hdl.handle.net/11449/303391 |
identifier_str_mv |
Restorative Dentistry And Endodontics. Seoul: Korean Acad Conservative Dentistry, v. 47, n. 1, 11 p., 2022. 2234-7658 10.5395/rde.2022.47.e2 WOS:001184636000002 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Restorative Dentistry And Endodontics |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
11 |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Korean Acad Conservative Dentistry |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Korean Acad Conservative Dentistry |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Web of Science reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1834482889242181632 |