How do imaging protocols affect the assessment of root-end fillings?

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Esteves Torres, Fernanda Ferrari [UNESP]
Publication Date: 2022
Other Authors: Jacobs, Reinhilde, EzEldeen, Mostafa, Faria-Vasconcelos, Karla de, Guerreiro-Tanomaru, Juliane Maria [UNESP], Santos, Bernardo Camargo dos, Tanomaru-Filho, Mario [UNESP]
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Download full: http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/rde.2022.47.e2
https://hdl.handle.net/11449/303391
Summary: Objectives: This study investigated the impact of micro-computed tomography (micro-CT)-based voxel size on the analysis of material/dentin interface voids and thickness of different endodontic cements. Materials and Methods: Following root-end resection and apical preparation, maxillary premolars were filled with mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), Biodentine, and intermediate restorative material (IRM) (n = 24). The samples were scanned using micro- CT (SkyScan 1272; Bruker) and the cement/dentin interface and thickness of materials were evaluated at voxel sizes of 5, 10, and 20 mu m. Analysis of variance and the Tukey test were conducted, and the degree of agreement between different voxel sizes was evaluated using the Bland and Altman method (p < 0.05). Results: All materials showed an increase in thickness from 5 to 10 and 20 mu m (p < 0.05). When evaluating the interface voids, materials were similar at 5 mu m (p > 0.05), while at 10 and 20 mu m Biodentine showed the lowest percentage of voids (p < 0.05). A decrease in the interface voids was observed for MTA and IRM at 20 mu m, while Biodentine showed differences among all voxel sizes (p < 0.05). The Bland-Altman plots for comparisons among voxel sizes showed the largest deviations when comparing images between 5 and 20 mu m. Conclusions: Voxel size had an impact on the micro-CT evaluation of thickness and interface voids of endodontic materials. All cements exhibited an increase in thickness and a decrease in the void percentage as the voxel size increased, especially when evaluating images at 20 mu m.
id UNSP_297ff0de42018f04b592fcbc117d9dbd
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/303391
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling How do imaging protocols affect the assessment of root-end fillings?Dental materialsEndodonticsMethodsX-ray microtomographyObjectives: This study investigated the impact of micro-computed tomography (micro-CT)-based voxel size on the analysis of material/dentin interface voids and thickness of different endodontic cements. Materials and Methods: Following root-end resection and apical preparation, maxillary premolars were filled with mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), Biodentine, and intermediate restorative material (IRM) (n = 24). The samples were scanned using micro- CT (SkyScan 1272; Bruker) and the cement/dentin interface and thickness of materials were evaluated at voxel sizes of 5, 10, and 20 mu m. Analysis of variance and the Tukey test were conducted, and the degree of agreement between different voxel sizes was evaluated using the Bland and Altman method (p < 0.05). Results: All materials showed an increase in thickness from 5 to 10 and 20 mu m (p < 0.05). When evaluating the interface voids, materials were similar at 5 mu m (p > 0.05), while at 10 and 20 mu m Biodentine showed the lowest percentage of voids (p < 0.05). A decrease in the interface voids was observed for MTA and IRM at 20 mu m, while Biodentine showed differences among all voxel sizes (p < 0.05). The Bland-Altman plots for comparisons among voxel sizes showed the largest deviations when comparing images between 5 and 20 mu m. Conclusions: Voxel size had an impact on the micro-CT evaluation of thickness and interface voids of endodontic materials. All cements exhibited an increase in thickness and a decrease in the void percentage as the voxel size increased, especially when evaluating images at 20 mu m.Sao Paulo State Univ UNESP, Sch Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, Rua Humaita 1680, BR-14801903 Araraquara, SP, BrazilKatholieke Univ Leuven, Fac Med, Dept Imaging & Pathol, OMFS IMPATH Res Grp, Leuven, BelgiumUniv Hosp Leuven, Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Leuven, BelgiumKarolinska Inst, Dept Dent Med, Stockholm, SwedenFed Univ Rio de Janeiro UFRJ, Dept Nucl Energy, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ UNESP, Sch Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, Rua Humaita 1680, BR-14801903 Araraquara, SP, BrazilKorean Acad Conservative DentistryUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Katholieke Univ LeuvenUniv Hosp LeuvenKarolinska InstUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)Esteves Torres, Fernanda Ferrari [UNESP]Jacobs, ReinhildeEzEldeen, MostafaFaria-Vasconcelos, Karla deGuerreiro-Tanomaru, Juliane Maria [UNESP]Santos, Bernardo Camargo dosTanomaru-Filho, Mario [UNESP]2025-04-29T19:29:29Z2022-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article11http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/rde.2022.47.e2Restorative Dentistry And Endodontics. Seoul: Korean Acad Conservative Dentistry, v. 47, n. 1, 11 p., 2022.2234-7658https://hdl.handle.net/11449/30339110.5395/rde.2022.47.e2WOS:001184636000002Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengRestorative Dentistry And Endodonticsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2025-05-01T06:01:31Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/303391Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462025-05-01T06:01:31Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv How do imaging protocols affect the assessment of root-end fillings?
title How do imaging protocols affect the assessment of root-end fillings?
spellingShingle How do imaging protocols affect the assessment of root-end fillings?
Esteves Torres, Fernanda Ferrari [UNESP]
Dental materials
Endodontics
Methods
X-ray microtomography
title_short How do imaging protocols affect the assessment of root-end fillings?
title_full How do imaging protocols affect the assessment of root-end fillings?
title_fullStr How do imaging protocols affect the assessment of root-end fillings?
title_full_unstemmed How do imaging protocols affect the assessment of root-end fillings?
title_sort How do imaging protocols affect the assessment of root-end fillings?
author Esteves Torres, Fernanda Ferrari [UNESP]
author_facet Esteves Torres, Fernanda Ferrari [UNESP]
Jacobs, Reinhilde
EzEldeen, Mostafa
Faria-Vasconcelos, Karla de
Guerreiro-Tanomaru, Juliane Maria [UNESP]
Santos, Bernardo Camargo dos
Tanomaru-Filho, Mario [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Jacobs, Reinhilde
EzEldeen, Mostafa
Faria-Vasconcelos, Karla de
Guerreiro-Tanomaru, Juliane Maria [UNESP]
Santos, Bernardo Camargo dos
Tanomaru-Filho, Mario [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Katholieke Univ Leuven
Univ Hosp Leuven
Karolinska Inst
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Esteves Torres, Fernanda Ferrari [UNESP]
Jacobs, Reinhilde
EzEldeen, Mostafa
Faria-Vasconcelos, Karla de
Guerreiro-Tanomaru, Juliane Maria [UNESP]
Santos, Bernardo Camargo dos
Tanomaru-Filho, Mario [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Dental materials
Endodontics
Methods
X-ray microtomography
topic Dental materials
Endodontics
Methods
X-ray microtomography
description Objectives: This study investigated the impact of micro-computed tomography (micro-CT)-based voxel size on the analysis of material/dentin interface voids and thickness of different endodontic cements. Materials and Methods: Following root-end resection and apical preparation, maxillary premolars were filled with mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), Biodentine, and intermediate restorative material (IRM) (n = 24). The samples were scanned using micro- CT (SkyScan 1272; Bruker) and the cement/dentin interface and thickness of materials were evaluated at voxel sizes of 5, 10, and 20 mu m. Analysis of variance and the Tukey test were conducted, and the degree of agreement between different voxel sizes was evaluated using the Bland and Altman method (p < 0.05). Results: All materials showed an increase in thickness from 5 to 10 and 20 mu m (p < 0.05). When evaluating the interface voids, materials were similar at 5 mu m (p > 0.05), while at 10 and 20 mu m Biodentine showed the lowest percentage of voids (p < 0.05). A decrease in the interface voids was observed for MTA and IRM at 20 mu m, while Biodentine showed differences among all voxel sizes (p < 0.05). The Bland-Altman plots for comparisons among voxel sizes showed the largest deviations when comparing images between 5 and 20 mu m. Conclusions: Voxel size had an impact on the micro-CT evaluation of thickness and interface voids of endodontic materials. All cements exhibited an increase in thickness and a decrease in the void percentage as the voxel size increased, especially when evaluating images at 20 mu m.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-02-01
2025-04-29T19:29:29Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/rde.2022.47.e2
Restorative Dentistry And Endodontics. Seoul: Korean Acad Conservative Dentistry, v. 47, n. 1, 11 p., 2022.
2234-7658
https://hdl.handle.net/11449/303391
10.5395/rde.2022.47.e2
WOS:001184636000002
url http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/rde.2022.47.e2
https://hdl.handle.net/11449/303391
identifier_str_mv Restorative Dentistry And Endodontics. Seoul: Korean Acad Conservative Dentistry, v. 47, n. 1, 11 p., 2022.
2234-7658
10.5395/rde.2022.47.e2
WOS:001184636000002
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Restorative Dentistry And Endodontics
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 11
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Korean Acad Conservative Dentistry
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Korean Acad Conservative Dentistry
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1834482889242181632