EFFECT OF DIFFERENT HERBICIDES ON BIDENS PILOSA AND EUPHORBIA HETEROPHYLLA BIOTYPES RESISTANT TO ALS INHIBITORS

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pereira, Maria Renata Rocha
Publication Date: 2022
Other Authors: Marchi, Sidnei, Martins, Dagoberto [UNESP]
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Download full: http://dx.doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v38n0a2022-53823
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/241750
Summary: Select herbicides with different mechanism of action is a satisfactory option for resistant weed control. Then, the present work aimed to study the efficiency of different herbicides and their mixtures on Bidens pilosa (blackjack) and Euphorbia heterophylla (wild poinsettia) biotypes, resistant to ALS herbicides in two development stages. The trials we arranged in a completely randomized design with four replications. The treatments tested were (g a.i/a.e ha-1): imazethapyr at 70 and 140 (WG formulation) + 1.0% Assist; imazethapyr at 57.6 and 72 (SL formulation) + 1.0% Assist; imazapic + imazethapyr at 56 and 70 + 1.0% Assist; glyphosate + imazethapyr (596); saflufenacil + glyphosate at 35 + 720 + 0.5% Dash in tank mix, glyphosate at 720 and, a control without herbicide application. Control efficiency was evaluated, as well as dry matter accumulation at the end of the studies. Plants of both species were more susceptible to herbicides at the early stage of development (2 to 4 leaves). The treatments with saflufenacil + glyphosate, (imazethapyr + glyphosate) and glyphosate promoted the best controls, regardless of the species studied and the application stage. The mixture with saflufenacil provided the highest control speed, and the mixture (imazethapyr + glyphosate) was less efficient among three excellent treatments when applied to plants in the 4-6 leaf stage. The treatments (imazethapyr, in both formulations) and (imazethapyr + imazapic) were ineffective in controlling the studied biotypes, regardless of dose and developmental stage studied.
id UNSP_142b622c47c8deec14abdc82eb09f83c
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/241750
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling EFFECT OF DIFFERENT HERBICIDES ON BIDENS PILOSA AND EUPHORBIA HETEROPHYLLA BIOTYPES RESISTANT TO ALS INHIBITORSAcetolactate SynthaseBlackjackResistanceWild PoinsettiaSelect herbicides with different mechanism of action is a satisfactory option for resistant weed control. Then, the present work aimed to study the efficiency of different herbicides and their mixtures on Bidens pilosa (blackjack) and Euphorbia heterophylla (wild poinsettia) biotypes, resistant to ALS herbicides in two development stages. The trials we arranged in a completely randomized design with four replications. The treatments tested were (g a.i/a.e ha-1): imazethapyr at 70 and 140 (WG formulation) + 1.0% Assist; imazethapyr at 57.6 and 72 (SL formulation) + 1.0% Assist; imazapic + imazethapyr at 56 and 70 + 1.0% Assist; glyphosate + imazethapyr (596); saflufenacil + glyphosate at 35 + 720 + 0.5% Dash in tank mix, glyphosate at 720 and, a control without herbicide application. Control efficiency was evaluated, as well as dry matter accumulation at the end of the studies. Plants of both species were more susceptible to herbicides at the early stage of development (2 to 4 leaves). The treatments with saflufenacil + glyphosate, (imazethapyr + glyphosate) and glyphosate promoted the best controls, regardless of the species studied and the application stage. The mixture with saflufenacil provided the highest control speed, and the mixture (imazethapyr + glyphosate) was less efficient among three excellent treatments when applied to plants in the 4-6 leaf stage. The treatments (imazethapyr, in both formulations) and (imazethapyr + imazapic) were ineffective in controlling the studied biotypes, regardless of dose and developmental stage studied.Department of Forestry Technology College of the State of São Paulo-Capão Bonito, São PauloDepartment of Agronomy State University of Mato Grosso, Mato GrossoDepartment of Plant Science São Paulo State University, São PauloDepartment of Plant Science São Paulo State University, São PauloTechnology College of the State of São Paulo-Capão BonitoState University of Mato GrossoUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Pereira, Maria Renata RochaMarchi, SidneiMartins, Dagoberto [UNESP]2023-03-01T23:40:41Z2023-03-01T23:40:41Z2022-02-16info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v38n0a2022-53823Bioscience Journal, v. 38.1981-31631516-3725http://hdl.handle.net/11449/24175010.14393/BJ-v38n0a2022-538232-s2.0-85128504529Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengBioscience Journalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-30T15:56:30Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/241750Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-04-30T15:56:30Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv EFFECT OF DIFFERENT HERBICIDES ON BIDENS PILOSA AND EUPHORBIA HETEROPHYLLA BIOTYPES RESISTANT TO ALS INHIBITORS
title EFFECT OF DIFFERENT HERBICIDES ON BIDENS PILOSA AND EUPHORBIA HETEROPHYLLA BIOTYPES RESISTANT TO ALS INHIBITORS
spellingShingle EFFECT OF DIFFERENT HERBICIDES ON BIDENS PILOSA AND EUPHORBIA HETEROPHYLLA BIOTYPES RESISTANT TO ALS INHIBITORS
Pereira, Maria Renata Rocha
Acetolactate Synthase
Blackjack
Resistance
Wild Poinsettia
title_short EFFECT OF DIFFERENT HERBICIDES ON BIDENS PILOSA AND EUPHORBIA HETEROPHYLLA BIOTYPES RESISTANT TO ALS INHIBITORS
title_full EFFECT OF DIFFERENT HERBICIDES ON BIDENS PILOSA AND EUPHORBIA HETEROPHYLLA BIOTYPES RESISTANT TO ALS INHIBITORS
title_fullStr EFFECT OF DIFFERENT HERBICIDES ON BIDENS PILOSA AND EUPHORBIA HETEROPHYLLA BIOTYPES RESISTANT TO ALS INHIBITORS
title_full_unstemmed EFFECT OF DIFFERENT HERBICIDES ON BIDENS PILOSA AND EUPHORBIA HETEROPHYLLA BIOTYPES RESISTANT TO ALS INHIBITORS
title_sort EFFECT OF DIFFERENT HERBICIDES ON BIDENS PILOSA AND EUPHORBIA HETEROPHYLLA BIOTYPES RESISTANT TO ALS INHIBITORS
author Pereira, Maria Renata Rocha
author_facet Pereira, Maria Renata Rocha
Marchi, Sidnei
Martins, Dagoberto [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Marchi, Sidnei
Martins, Dagoberto [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Technology College of the State of São Paulo-Capão Bonito
State University of Mato Grosso
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pereira, Maria Renata Rocha
Marchi, Sidnei
Martins, Dagoberto [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Acetolactate Synthase
Blackjack
Resistance
Wild Poinsettia
topic Acetolactate Synthase
Blackjack
Resistance
Wild Poinsettia
description Select herbicides with different mechanism of action is a satisfactory option for resistant weed control. Then, the present work aimed to study the efficiency of different herbicides and their mixtures on Bidens pilosa (blackjack) and Euphorbia heterophylla (wild poinsettia) biotypes, resistant to ALS herbicides in two development stages. The trials we arranged in a completely randomized design with four replications. The treatments tested were (g a.i/a.e ha-1): imazethapyr at 70 and 140 (WG formulation) + 1.0% Assist; imazethapyr at 57.6 and 72 (SL formulation) + 1.0% Assist; imazapic + imazethapyr at 56 and 70 + 1.0% Assist; glyphosate + imazethapyr (596); saflufenacil + glyphosate at 35 + 720 + 0.5% Dash in tank mix, glyphosate at 720 and, a control without herbicide application. Control efficiency was evaluated, as well as dry matter accumulation at the end of the studies. Plants of both species were more susceptible to herbicides at the early stage of development (2 to 4 leaves). The treatments with saflufenacil + glyphosate, (imazethapyr + glyphosate) and glyphosate promoted the best controls, regardless of the species studied and the application stage. The mixture with saflufenacil provided the highest control speed, and the mixture (imazethapyr + glyphosate) was less efficient among three excellent treatments when applied to plants in the 4-6 leaf stage. The treatments (imazethapyr, in both formulations) and (imazethapyr + imazapic) were ineffective in controlling the studied biotypes, regardless of dose and developmental stage studied.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-02-16
2023-03-01T23:40:41Z
2023-03-01T23:40:41Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v38n0a2022-53823
Bioscience Journal, v. 38.
1981-3163
1516-3725
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/241750
10.14393/BJ-v38n0a2022-53823
2-s2.0-85128504529
url http://dx.doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v38n0a2022-53823
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/241750
identifier_str_mv Bioscience Journal, v. 38.
1981-3163
1516-3725
10.14393/BJ-v38n0a2022-53823
2-s2.0-85128504529
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Bioscience Journal
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1834483352770445312