EFFECT OF DIFFERENT HERBICIDES ON BIDENS PILOSA AND EUPHORBIA HETEROPHYLLA BIOTYPES RESISTANT TO ALS INHIBITORS
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Publication Date: | 2022 |
| Other Authors: | , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | eng |
| Source: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
| Download full: | http://dx.doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v38n0a2022-53823 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/241750 |
Summary: | Select herbicides with different mechanism of action is a satisfactory option for resistant weed control. Then, the present work aimed to study the efficiency of different herbicides and their mixtures on Bidens pilosa (blackjack) and Euphorbia heterophylla (wild poinsettia) biotypes, resistant to ALS herbicides in two development stages. The trials we arranged in a completely randomized design with four replications. The treatments tested were (g a.i/a.e ha-1): imazethapyr at 70 and 140 (WG formulation) + 1.0% Assist; imazethapyr at 57.6 and 72 (SL formulation) + 1.0% Assist; imazapic + imazethapyr at 56 and 70 + 1.0% Assist; glyphosate + imazethapyr (596); saflufenacil + glyphosate at 35 + 720 + 0.5% Dash in tank mix, glyphosate at 720 and, a control without herbicide application. Control efficiency was evaluated, as well as dry matter accumulation at the end of the studies. Plants of both species were more susceptible to herbicides at the early stage of development (2 to 4 leaves). The treatments with saflufenacil + glyphosate, (imazethapyr + glyphosate) and glyphosate promoted the best controls, regardless of the species studied and the application stage. The mixture with saflufenacil provided the highest control speed, and the mixture (imazethapyr + glyphosate) was less efficient among three excellent treatments when applied to plants in the 4-6 leaf stage. The treatments (imazethapyr, in both formulations) and (imazethapyr + imazapic) were ineffective in controlling the studied biotypes, regardless of dose and developmental stage studied. |
| id |
UNSP_142b622c47c8deec14abdc82eb09f83c |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/241750 |
| network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
| network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
| repository_id_str |
2946 |
| spelling |
EFFECT OF DIFFERENT HERBICIDES ON BIDENS PILOSA AND EUPHORBIA HETEROPHYLLA BIOTYPES RESISTANT TO ALS INHIBITORSAcetolactate SynthaseBlackjackResistanceWild PoinsettiaSelect herbicides with different mechanism of action is a satisfactory option for resistant weed control. Then, the present work aimed to study the efficiency of different herbicides and their mixtures on Bidens pilosa (blackjack) and Euphorbia heterophylla (wild poinsettia) biotypes, resistant to ALS herbicides in two development stages. The trials we arranged in a completely randomized design with four replications. The treatments tested were (g a.i/a.e ha-1): imazethapyr at 70 and 140 (WG formulation) + 1.0% Assist; imazethapyr at 57.6 and 72 (SL formulation) + 1.0% Assist; imazapic + imazethapyr at 56 and 70 + 1.0% Assist; glyphosate + imazethapyr (596); saflufenacil + glyphosate at 35 + 720 + 0.5% Dash in tank mix, glyphosate at 720 and, a control without herbicide application. Control efficiency was evaluated, as well as dry matter accumulation at the end of the studies. Plants of both species were more susceptible to herbicides at the early stage of development (2 to 4 leaves). The treatments with saflufenacil + glyphosate, (imazethapyr + glyphosate) and glyphosate promoted the best controls, regardless of the species studied and the application stage. The mixture with saflufenacil provided the highest control speed, and the mixture (imazethapyr + glyphosate) was less efficient among three excellent treatments when applied to plants in the 4-6 leaf stage. The treatments (imazethapyr, in both formulations) and (imazethapyr + imazapic) were ineffective in controlling the studied biotypes, regardless of dose and developmental stage studied.Department of Forestry Technology College of the State of São Paulo-Capão Bonito, São PauloDepartment of Agronomy State University of Mato Grosso, Mato GrossoDepartment of Plant Science São Paulo State University, São PauloDepartment of Plant Science São Paulo State University, São PauloTechnology College of the State of São Paulo-Capão BonitoState University of Mato GrossoUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Pereira, Maria Renata RochaMarchi, SidneiMartins, Dagoberto [UNESP]2023-03-01T23:40:41Z2023-03-01T23:40:41Z2022-02-16info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v38n0a2022-53823Bioscience Journal, v. 38.1981-31631516-3725http://hdl.handle.net/11449/24175010.14393/BJ-v38n0a2022-538232-s2.0-85128504529Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengBioscience Journalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-30T15:56:30Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/241750Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-04-30T15:56:30Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
EFFECT OF DIFFERENT HERBICIDES ON BIDENS PILOSA AND EUPHORBIA HETEROPHYLLA BIOTYPES RESISTANT TO ALS INHIBITORS |
| title |
EFFECT OF DIFFERENT HERBICIDES ON BIDENS PILOSA AND EUPHORBIA HETEROPHYLLA BIOTYPES RESISTANT TO ALS INHIBITORS |
| spellingShingle |
EFFECT OF DIFFERENT HERBICIDES ON BIDENS PILOSA AND EUPHORBIA HETEROPHYLLA BIOTYPES RESISTANT TO ALS INHIBITORS Pereira, Maria Renata Rocha Acetolactate Synthase Blackjack Resistance Wild Poinsettia |
| title_short |
EFFECT OF DIFFERENT HERBICIDES ON BIDENS PILOSA AND EUPHORBIA HETEROPHYLLA BIOTYPES RESISTANT TO ALS INHIBITORS |
| title_full |
EFFECT OF DIFFERENT HERBICIDES ON BIDENS PILOSA AND EUPHORBIA HETEROPHYLLA BIOTYPES RESISTANT TO ALS INHIBITORS |
| title_fullStr |
EFFECT OF DIFFERENT HERBICIDES ON BIDENS PILOSA AND EUPHORBIA HETEROPHYLLA BIOTYPES RESISTANT TO ALS INHIBITORS |
| title_full_unstemmed |
EFFECT OF DIFFERENT HERBICIDES ON BIDENS PILOSA AND EUPHORBIA HETEROPHYLLA BIOTYPES RESISTANT TO ALS INHIBITORS |
| title_sort |
EFFECT OF DIFFERENT HERBICIDES ON BIDENS PILOSA AND EUPHORBIA HETEROPHYLLA BIOTYPES RESISTANT TO ALS INHIBITORS |
| author |
Pereira, Maria Renata Rocha |
| author_facet |
Pereira, Maria Renata Rocha Marchi, Sidnei Martins, Dagoberto [UNESP] |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Marchi, Sidnei Martins, Dagoberto [UNESP] |
| author2_role |
author author |
| dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Technology College of the State of São Paulo-Capão Bonito State University of Mato Grosso Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pereira, Maria Renata Rocha Marchi, Sidnei Martins, Dagoberto [UNESP] |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Acetolactate Synthase Blackjack Resistance Wild Poinsettia |
| topic |
Acetolactate Synthase Blackjack Resistance Wild Poinsettia |
| description |
Select herbicides with different mechanism of action is a satisfactory option for resistant weed control. Then, the present work aimed to study the efficiency of different herbicides and their mixtures on Bidens pilosa (blackjack) and Euphorbia heterophylla (wild poinsettia) biotypes, resistant to ALS herbicides in two development stages. The trials we arranged in a completely randomized design with four replications. The treatments tested were (g a.i/a.e ha-1): imazethapyr at 70 and 140 (WG formulation) + 1.0% Assist; imazethapyr at 57.6 and 72 (SL formulation) + 1.0% Assist; imazapic + imazethapyr at 56 and 70 + 1.0% Assist; glyphosate + imazethapyr (596); saflufenacil + glyphosate at 35 + 720 + 0.5% Dash in tank mix, glyphosate at 720 and, a control without herbicide application. Control efficiency was evaluated, as well as dry matter accumulation at the end of the studies. Plants of both species were more susceptible to herbicides at the early stage of development (2 to 4 leaves). The treatments with saflufenacil + glyphosate, (imazethapyr + glyphosate) and glyphosate promoted the best controls, regardless of the species studied and the application stage. The mixture with saflufenacil provided the highest control speed, and the mixture (imazethapyr + glyphosate) was less efficient among three excellent treatments when applied to plants in the 4-6 leaf stage. The treatments (imazethapyr, in both formulations) and (imazethapyr + imazapic) were ineffective in controlling the studied biotypes, regardless of dose and developmental stage studied. |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-02-16 2023-03-01T23:40:41Z 2023-03-01T23:40:41Z |
| dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v38n0a2022-53823 Bioscience Journal, v. 38. 1981-3163 1516-3725 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/241750 10.14393/BJ-v38n0a2022-53823 2-s2.0-85128504529 |
| url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v38n0a2022-53823 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/241750 |
| identifier_str_mv |
Bioscience Journal, v. 38. 1981-3163 1516-3725 10.14393/BJ-v38n0a2022-53823 2-s2.0-85128504529 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Bioscience Journal |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
| instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
| instacron_str |
UNESP |
| institution |
UNESP |
| reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
| collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
| _version_ |
1834483352770445312 |