Palliative radiotherapy for gastric cancer: Is there a dose relationship between bleeding response and radiotherapy?

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Viani, Gustavo Arruda
Publication Date: 2020
Other Authors: Arruda, Caio Viani [UNESP], Hamamura, Ana Carolina, Faustino, Alexandre Ciufi, Danelichen, Anielle Freitas Bendo, Matsuura, Fernando Kojo, Neves, Leonardo Vicente Fay [UNESP]
Format: Other
Language: eng
Source: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Download full: http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2020/e1644
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/205203
Summary: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether there is a relationship between bleeding response and radiotherapy dose to palliate patients with local recurrence or progression of gastric cancer (GC). To this end, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies that evaluated the bleeding response in patients with GC with local recurrence or progression. A meta-regression analysis between biological effective dose (BED) and bleeding response was performed, as was subgroup analysis to evaluate the outcome by BED level and radiotherapy (RT) technique. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant. Ten non-comparative retrospective studies and one prospective study were included. In general, RT was effective at controlling tumor bleeding, and the bleeding response rate was 0.77 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.73–0.81). Meta-regression analysis demonstrated a linear correlation between BED Gy 10 and bleeding response (p=0<0001). Studies using conformational RT had a significant bleeding response rate compared to those using 2D (0.79; 95%CI, 0.74–0.84 vs 0.65; 95%CI, 0.56–0.75; p=0.021). In terms of the BED level, a significant difference in BR was identified on comparing BED Gy10 ≥40 (0.79; 95%CI, 0.7–0.8), BED Gy10 30–39 (0.79, 95%CI, 0.71–0.86), and BED Gy10 <30 (0.64; 95%CI, 0.5–0.7; p=0.0001). The mean survival time was 3.31 months (95%CI, 2.73–3.9) months, and the responders had a significantly longer survival (longer by 2.5 months) compared to the non-responders (95%CI, 1.7–3.3; p<0.0001). Palliative RT is effective at controlling bleeding due to local recurrence/progression from GC. Our findings reveal a relationship between BR and BED. BED <30 Gy 10 should not be recommended, and 3DRT should be indicated instead in order to improve the result.
id UNSP_0cd63efa0f81e5876c50a0bbd76295fa
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/205203
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Palliative radiotherapy for gastric cancer: Is there a dose relationship between bleeding response and radiotherapy?BleedingGastric CancerPalliativeRadiotherapyThe aim of this study was to evaluate whether there is a relationship between bleeding response and radiotherapy dose to palliate patients with local recurrence or progression of gastric cancer (GC). To this end, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies that evaluated the bleeding response in patients with GC with local recurrence or progression. A meta-regression analysis between biological effective dose (BED) and bleeding response was performed, as was subgroup analysis to evaluate the outcome by BED level and radiotherapy (RT) technique. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant. Ten non-comparative retrospective studies and one prospective study were included. In general, RT was effective at controlling tumor bleeding, and the bleeding response rate was 0.77 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.73–0.81). Meta-regression analysis demonstrated a linear correlation between BED Gy 10 and bleeding response (p=0<0001). Studies using conformational RT had a significant bleeding response rate compared to those using 2D (0.79; 95%CI, 0.74–0.84 vs 0.65; 95%CI, 0.56–0.75; p=0.021). In terms of the BED level, a significant difference in BR was identified on comparing BED Gy10 ≥40 (0.79; 95%CI, 0.7–0.8), BED Gy10 30–39 (0.79, 95%CI, 0.71–0.86), and BED Gy10 <30 (0.64; 95%CI, 0.5–0.7; p=0.0001). The mean survival time was 3.31 months (95%CI, 2.73–3.9) months, and the responders had a significantly longer survival (longer by 2.5 months) compared to the non-responders (95%CI, 1.7–3.3; p<0.0001). Palliative RT is effective at controlling bleeding due to local recurrence/progression from GC. Our findings reveal a relationship between BR and BED. BED <30 Gy 10 should not be recommended, and 3DRT should be indicated instead in order to improve the result.Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirao Preto (FMRP) Universidade de Sao PauloInstituto de Biociencias Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Instituto de Biociencias Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Universidade de São Paulo (USP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Viani, Gustavo ArrudaArruda, Caio Viani [UNESP]Hamamura, Ana CarolinaFaustino, Alexandre CiufiDanelichen, Anielle Freitas BendoMatsuura, Fernando KojoNeves, Leonardo Vicente Fay [UNESP]2021-06-25T10:11:31Z2021-06-25T10:11:31Z2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/other1-7application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2020/e1644Clinics, v. 75, p. 1-7.1807-5932http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20520310.6061/clinics/2020/e1644S1807-593220200001004232-s2.0-85091354886S1807-59322020000100423.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengClinicsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-01-28T06:47:14Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/205203Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-01-28T06:47:14Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Palliative radiotherapy for gastric cancer: Is there a dose relationship between bleeding response and radiotherapy?
title Palliative radiotherapy for gastric cancer: Is there a dose relationship between bleeding response and radiotherapy?
spellingShingle Palliative radiotherapy for gastric cancer: Is there a dose relationship between bleeding response and radiotherapy?
Viani, Gustavo Arruda
Bleeding
Gastric Cancer
Palliative
Radiotherapy
title_short Palliative radiotherapy for gastric cancer: Is there a dose relationship between bleeding response and radiotherapy?
title_full Palliative radiotherapy for gastric cancer: Is there a dose relationship between bleeding response and radiotherapy?
title_fullStr Palliative radiotherapy for gastric cancer: Is there a dose relationship between bleeding response and radiotherapy?
title_full_unstemmed Palliative radiotherapy for gastric cancer: Is there a dose relationship between bleeding response and radiotherapy?
title_sort Palliative radiotherapy for gastric cancer: Is there a dose relationship between bleeding response and radiotherapy?
author Viani, Gustavo Arruda
author_facet Viani, Gustavo Arruda
Arruda, Caio Viani [UNESP]
Hamamura, Ana Carolina
Faustino, Alexandre Ciufi
Danelichen, Anielle Freitas Bendo
Matsuura, Fernando Kojo
Neves, Leonardo Vicente Fay [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Arruda, Caio Viani [UNESP]
Hamamura, Ana Carolina
Faustino, Alexandre Ciufi
Danelichen, Anielle Freitas Bendo
Matsuura, Fernando Kojo
Neves, Leonardo Vicente Fay [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Viani, Gustavo Arruda
Arruda, Caio Viani [UNESP]
Hamamura, Ana Carolina
Faustino, Alexandre Ciufi
Danelichen, Anielle Freitas Bendo
Matsuura, Fernando Kojo
Neves, Leonardo Vicente Fay [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Bleeding
Gastric Cancer
Palliative
Radiotherapy
topic Bleeding
Gastric Cancer
Palliative
Radiotherapy
description The aim of this study was to evaluate whether there is a relationship between bleeding response and radiotherapy dose to palliate patients with local recurrence or progression of gastric cancer (GC). To this end, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies that evaluated the bleeding response in patients with GC with local recurrence or progression. A meta-regression analysis between biological effective dose (BED) and bleeding response was performed, as was subgroup analysis to evaluate the outcome by BED level and radiotherapy (RT) technique. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant. Ten non-comparative retrospective studies and one prospective study were included. In general, RT was effective at controlling tumor bleeding, and the bleeding response rate was 0.77 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.73–0.81). Meta-regression analysis demonstrated a linear correlation between BED Gy 10 and bleeding response (p=0<0001). Studies using conformational RT had a significant bleeding response rate compared to those using 2D (0.79; 95%CI, 0.74–0.84 vs 0.65; 95%CI, 0.56–0.75; p=0.021). In terms of the BED level, a significant difference in BR was identified on comparing BED Gy10 ≥40 (0.79; 95%CI, 0.7–0.8), BED Gy10 30–39 (0.79, 95%CI, 0.71–0.86), and BED Gy10 <30 (0.64; 95%CI, 0.5–0.7; p=0.0001). The mean survival time was 3.31 months (95%CI, 2.73–3.9) months, and the responders had a significantly longer survival (longer by 2.5 months) compared to the non-responders (95%CI, 1.7–3.3; p<0.0001). Palliative RT is effective at controlling bleeding due to local recurrence/progression from GC. Our findings reveal a relationship between BR and BED. BED <30 Gy 10 should not be recommended, and 3DRT should be indicated instead in order to improve the result.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-01
2021-06-25T10:11:31Z
2021-06-25T10:11:31Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format other
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2020/e1644
Clinics, v. 75, p. 1-7.
1807-5932
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/205203
10.6061/clinics/2020/e1644
S1807-59322020000100423
2-s2.0-85091354886
S1807-59322020000100423.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2020/e1644
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/205203
identifier_str_mv Clinics, v. 75, p. 1-7.
1807-5932
10.6061/clinics/2020/e1644
S1807-59322020000100423
2-s2.0-85091354886
S1807-59322020000100423.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Clinics
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 1-7
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1834483938903457792