Peer-review in academia: Guidance for graduate students

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cavalhieri, Klaus E.
Publication Date: 2022
Format: Article
Language: por
Source: Psi Unisc
Download full: https://seer.unisc.br/index.php/psi/article/view/16990
Summary: The peer review process of new manuscripts guarantees the quality of published studies on most scientific journals, ensuring the progress of science. However, graduate students receive little training, frequently informally, on how to review a manuscript. The present manuscript describes the publication and peer review process, and I suggest a three part review of new manuscripts: (a) an initial paragraph, (b) a brief synopsis, and (c) suggestions to the article. Therefore, I hope to improve the quality of the peer-review and the published works in the national literature.
id UNISC-7_bb657ed04b6d4727b1b6c6e61a4ec9fb
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.online.unisc.br:article/16990
network_acronym_str UNISC-7
network_name_str Psi Unisc
repository_id_str
spelling Peer-review in academia: Guidance for graduate studentsRevisión por pares en el mundo académico: pautas y sugerencias para estudiantes graduadosRevisão por pares no universo acadêmico: Diretrizes e sugestões para pós-graduandosRevisión por paresManuscritosPublicación academicaRevisão por paresManuscritosPublicação acadêmicaPeer reviewManuscriptsScholarly publishingThe peer review process of new manuscripts guarantees the quality of published studies on most scientific journals, ensuring the progress of science. However, graduate students receive little training, frequently informally, on how to review a manuscript. The present manuscript describes the publication and peer review process, and I suggest a three part review of new manuscripts: (a) an initial paragraph, (b) a brief synopsis, and (c) suggestions to the article. Therefore, I hope to improve the quality of the peer-review and the published works in the national literature.El proceso de revisión por pares (peer review) de nuevos manuscritos garantiza la calidad de los estudios publicados en la mayoría de las revistas, lo que garantiza el avance continuo de la ciencia. Sin embargo, poco entrenamiento se da a los estudiantes graduados sobre cómo revisar, a menudo de manera informal. El presente estudio es una revisión de cómo se produce el proceso de publicación y revisión por pares, y sugiere una revisión dividida en tres partes: (a) un párrafo inicial, (b) una breve sinopsis y (c) sugerencias al artículo. Así, se busca facilitar manuscritos proceso de publicación y mejorar la calidad de los trabajos publicados en la literatura nacional.O processo de revisão por pares (peer review) de novos manuscritos garante a qualidade de estudos publicados na grande maioria dos periódicos científicos, assegurando o avanço contínuo da ciência. Contudo, pouco treinamento é dado à pós-graduandos em como fazer uma revisão, frequentemente de forma informal. O presente manuscrito descreve o processo de publicação e sugere uma revisão dividida em três partes: (a) um parágrafo inicial, (b) uma breve sinopse, e (c) sugestões ao artigo. Assim, busca-se facilitar o processo de publicação de manuscritos e aprimorar a qualidade de trabalhos publicados na literatura nacional na área de psicologia.EDUNISC2022-09-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.unisc.br/index.php/psi/article/view/1699010.17058/psiunisc.v6i2.16990Psi Unisc; Vol. 6 No. 2 (2022); 8-18Psi Unisc; Vol. 6 Núm. 2 (2022); 8-18Psi Unisc; v. 6 n. 2 (2022); 8-182527-1288reponame:Psi Uniscinstname:Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)instacron:UNISCporhttps://seer.unisc.br/index.php/psi/article/view/16990/10537Copyright (c) 2022 PSI UNISCinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCavalhieri, Klaus E.2024-05-02T17:34:34Zoai:ojs.online.unisc.br:article/16990Revistahttps://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/psi/PUBhttps://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/psi/oaicristianefr@unisc.br || psiunisc@gmail.comhttps://doi.org/10.17058/psiunisc2527-12882527-1288opendoar:2024-05-02T17:34:34Psi Unisc - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Peer-review in academia: Guidance for graduate students
Revisión por pares en el mundo académico: pautas y sugerencias para estudiantes graduados
Revisão por pares no universo acadêmico: Diretrizes e sugestões para pós-graduandos
title Peer-review in academia: Guidance for graduate students
spellingShingle Peer-review in academia: Guidance for graduate students
Cavalhieri, Klaus E.
Revisión por pares
Manuscritos
Publicación academica
Revisão por pares
Manuscritos
Publicação acadêmica
Peer review
Manuscripts
Scholarly publishing
title_short Peer-review in academia: Guidance for graduate students
title_full Peer-review in academia: Guidance for graduate students
title_fullStr Peer-review in academia: Guidance for graduate students
title_full_unstemmed Peer-review in academia: Guidance for graduate students
title_sort Peer-review in academia: Guidance for graduate students
author Cavalhieri, Klaus E.
author_facet Cavalhieri, Klaus E.
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cavalhieri, Klaus E.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Revisión por pares
Manuscritos
Publicación academica
Revisão por pares
Manuscritos
Publicação acadêmica
Peer review
Manuscripts
Scholarly publishing
topic Revisión por pares
Manuscritos
Publicación academica
Revisão por pares
Manuscritos
Publicação acadêmica
Peer review
Manuscripts
Scholarly publishing
description The peer review process of new manuscripts guarantees the quality of published studies on most scientific journals, ensuring the progress of science. However, graduate students receive little training, frequently informally, on how to review a manuscript. The present manuscript describes the publication and peer review process, and I suggest a three part review of new manuscripts: (a) an initial paragraph, (b) a brief synopsis, and (c) suggestions to the article. Therefore, I hope to improve the quality of the peer-review and the published works in the national literature.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-09-06
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.unisc.br/index.php/psi/article/view/16990
10.17058/psiunisc.v6i2.16990
url https://seer.unisc.br/index.php/psi/article/view/16990
identifier_str_mv 10.17058/psiunisc.v6i2.16990
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.unisc.br/index.php/psi/article/view/16990/10537
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 PSI UNISC
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 PSI UNISC
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUNISC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUNISC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Psi Unisc; Vol. 6 No. 2 (2022); 8-18
Psi Unisc; Vol. 6 Núm. 2 (2022); 8-18
Psi Unisc; v. 6 n. 2 (2022); 8-18
2527-1288
reponame:Psi Unisc
instname:Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)
instacron:UNISC
instname_str Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)
instacron_str UNISC
institution UNISC
reponame_str Psi Unisc
collection Psi Unisc
repository.name.fl_str_mv Psi Unisc - Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul (UNISC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cristianefr@unisc.br || psiunisc@gmail.com
_version_ 1844155094040313856