Electoral justice in Brazil: autonomy and institutional resources
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | por eng |
| Source: | Pensar (Fortaleza. Online) |
| Download full: | https://ojs.unifor.br/rpen/article/view/14815 |
Summary: | The article analyzes the institutional resources that allowed the Electoral Court in Brazil to preserve its autonomy in the face of pressure exerted by the Bolsonaro government. After a summary of the history of the Electoral Court before the 1988 Constitution, the work highlights the characteristics of the institutional design of the Electoral Court in the current democratic regime, analyzing the different aspects of its autonomy based on constitutional and legal norms and empirical data on its functioning. The article then demonstrates that the Electoral Court's different electoral governance functions exercises, including the elaboration of electoral rules, generated a process of self-reinforcement of its autonomy, increasing the costs of eventual attempts to reverse it. This process was also guaranteed by the institutional articulation of the Superior Electoral Court with the Federal Supreme Court, in which the latter court acts as a self-referential veto point, which preserves the decisions of the Electoral Court |
| id |
UNIFOR-3_8732269622a50b0336f59d8846646343 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs3.ojs.unifor.br:article/14815 |
| network_acronym_str |
UNIFOR-3 |
| network_name_str |
Pensar (Fortaleza. Online) |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Electoral justice in Brazil: autonomy and institutional resourcesLa justicia electoral en Brasil: autonomía y recursos institucionales La Giustizia Elettorale in Brasile: autonomia e risorse istituzionaliA Justiça Eleitoral no Brasil: autonomia e recursos institucionaisjusticia electoralgobernanza electoralsistema electoral brasileñojustiça eleitoralgovernança eleitoralsistema eleitoral brasileiroelectoral justiceelectoral governanceBrazilian electoral systemgiustizia elettoralegovernance elettoralesistema elettorale brasilianoThe article analyzes the institutional resources that allowed the Electoral Court in Brazil to preserve its autonomy in the face of pressure exerted by the Bolsonaro government. After a summary of the history of the Electoral Court before the 1988 Constitution, the work highlights the characteristics of the institutional design of the Electoral Court in the current democratic regime, analyzing the different aspects of its autonomy based on constitutional and legal norms and empirical data on its functioning. The article then demonstrates that the Electoral Court's different electoral governance functions exercises, including the elaboration of electoral rules, generated a process of self-reinforcement of its autonomy, increasing the costs of eventual attempts to reverse it. This process was also guaranteed by the institutional articulation of the Superior Electoral Court with the Federal Supreme Court, in which the latter court acts as a self-referential veto point, which preserves the decisions of the Electoral CourtEl artículo analiza los recursos institucionales que permitieron a la Justicia Electoral en Brasil preservar su autonomía ante las presiones ejercidas por el gobierno Bolsonaro. Después de una breve síntesis de la historia de la Justicia Electoral anterior a la Constitución de 1988, el trabajo enfoca las características del diseño institucional de la Justicia Electoral en el actual régimen democrático, analizando los diferentes aspectos de su autonomía, con base en las normas constitucionales y legales y en datos empíricos sobre su funcionamiento. En seguida, el artículo demuestra que el ejercicio de diferentes funciones de gobernanza electoral por la Justicia Electoral, incluso en la creación de reglas electorales, generó un proceso de autorrefuerzo de su autonomía, aumentando los costes de los eventuales intentos de revertirla. Este proceso fue garantizado también por la articulación institucional del Tribunal Superior Electoral con el Supremo Tribunal Federal, la cual este último tribunal actúa como un punto de veto autorreferente, que preserva las decisiones de la Justicia Electoral.L’articolo analizza le risorse istituzionali che hanno permesso alla Giustizia Elettorale in Brasile di preservare la propria autonomia di fronte alle pressioni esercitate dal governo Bolsonaro. Dopo una breve sintesi della storia della Giustizia Elettorale precedente alla Costituzione del 1988, il lavoro mette in evidenza le caratteristiche del disegno istituzionale della Giustizia Elettorale nel vigente regime democratico e analizza i diversi aspetti della sua autonomia, sulla base delle norme costituzionali e legali, nonché di dati empirici relativi al suo funzionamento. Successivamente, l’articolo dimostra che l’esercizio da parte della Giustizia Elettorale delle diverse funzioni di governance elettorale, compresa l’elaborazione delle regole elettorali, ha generato un processo di auto-rafforzamento della sua autonomia, aumentando i costi delle eventuali tentate revoche. Tale processo è stato garantito anche dall’articolazione istituzionale tra il Tribunale Superiore Elettorale e la Corte Suprema Federale, nella quale quest’ultima agisce come punto di veto autoreferenziale, che preserva le decisioni della Giustizia Elettorale.O artigo analisa os recursos institucionais que permitiram à Justiça Eleitoral no Brasil preservar sua autonomia diante das pressões exercidas pelo governo Bolsonaro. Após uma breve síntese da história da Justiça Eleitoral anterior à Constituição de 1988, o trabalho destaca as características do desenho institucional da Justiça Eleitoral no atual regime democrático e analisa os diferentes aspectos de sua autonomia, com base nas normas constitucionais e legais e em dados empíricos sobre seu funcionamento. Em seguida, o artigo demonstra que o exercício de diferentes funções de governança eleitoral pela Justiça Eleitoral, inclusive na elaboração de regras eleitorais, gerou um processo de autorreforço de sua autonomia, aumentando os custos das eventuais tentativas de revertê-la. Esse processo foi garantido também pela articulação institucional do Tribunal Superior Eleitoral com o Supremo Tribunal Federal, na qual este último tribunal atua como um ponto de veto autorreferente, que preserva as decisões da Justiça Eleitoral. Universidade de Fortaleza2025-02-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.unifor.br/rpen/article/view/1481510.5020/2317-2150.2025.14815Journal of Legal Sciences; Vol. 30 (2025); 1-16La Pensar - Revista de Ciencias Jurídicas; Vol. 30 (2025); 1-16Pensar – Rivista di Scienze Giuridiche; V. 30 (2025); 1-16Pensar - Revista de Ciências Jurídicas; v. 30 (2025); 1-162317-21501519-8464reponame:Pensar (Fortaleza. Online)instname:Universidade de Fortaleza (UNIFOR)instacron:UNIFORporenghttps://ojs.unifor.br/rpen/article/view/14815/8391https://ojs.unifor.br/rpen/article/view/14815/8845https://ojs.unifor.br/rpen/article/view/14815/8175https://ojs.unifor.br/rpen/article/view/14815/8177https://ojs.unifor.br/rpen/article/view/14815/8849Copyright (c) 2025 Pensar - Revista de Ciências Jurídicas info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMaués, Antonio Gomes Moreira Freitas, Juliana Rodrigues2025-08-22T17:43:14Zoai:ojs3.ojs.unifor.br:article/14815Revistahttps://ojs.unifor.br/rpenPUBhttps://ojs.unifor.br/rpen/oai||revistapensar@unifor.br2317-21501519-8464opendoar:2025-08-22T17:43:14Pensar (Fortaleza. Online) - Universidade de Fortaleza (UNIFOR)false |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Electoral justice in Brazil: autonomy and institutional resources La justicia electoral en Brasil: autonomía y recursos institucionales La Giustizia Elettorale in Brasile: autonomia e risorse istituzionali A Justiça Eleitoral no Brasil: autonomia e recursos institucionais |
| title |
Electoral justice in Brazil: autonomy and institutional resources |
| spellingShingle |
Electoral justice in Brazil: autonomy and institutional resources Maués, Antonio Gomes Moreira justicia electoral gobernanza electoral sistema electoral brasileño justiça eleitoral governança eleitoral sistema eleitoral brasileiro electoral justice electoral governance Brazilian electoral system giustizia elettorale governance elettorale sistema elettorale brasiliano |
| title_short |
Electoral justice in Brazil: autonomy and institutional resources |
| title_full |
Electoral justice in Brazil: autonomy and institutional resources |
| title_fullStr |
Electoral justice in Brazil: autonomy and institutional resources |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Electoral justice in Brazil: autonomy and institutional resources |
| title_sort |
Electoral justice in Brazil: autonomy and institutional resources |
| author |
Maués, Antonio Gomes Moreira |
| author_facet |
Maués, Antonio Gomes Moreira Freitas, Juliana Rodrigues |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Freitas, Juliana Rodrigues |
| author2_role |
author |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Maués, Antonio Gomes Moreira Freitas, Juliana Rodrigues |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
justicia electoral gobernanza electoral sistema electoral brasileño justiça eleitoral governança eleitoral sistema eleitoral brasileiro electoral justice electoral governance Brazilian electoral system giustizia elettorale governance elettorale sistema elettorale brasiliano |
| topic |
justicia electoral gobernanza electoral sistema electoral brasileño justiça eleitoral governança eleitoral sistema eleitoral brasileiro electoral justice electoral governance Brazilian electoral system giustizia elettorale governance elettorale sistema elettorale brasiliano |
| description |
The article analyzes the institutional resources that allowed the Electoral Court in Brazil to preserve its autonomy in the face of pressure exerted by the Bolsonaro government. After a summary of the history of the Electoral Court before the 1988 Constitution, the work highlights the characteristics of the institutional design of the Electoral Court in the current democratic regime, analyzing the different aspects of its autonomy based on constitutional and legal norms and empirical data on its functioning. The article then demonstrates that the Electoral Court's different electoral governance functions exercises, including the elaboration of electoral rules, generated a process of self-reinforcement of its autonomy, increasing the costs of eventual attempts to reverse it. This process was also guaranteed by the institutional articulation of the Superior Electoral Court with the Federal Supreme Court, in which the latter court acts as a self-referential veto point, which preserves the decisions of the Electoral Court |
| publishDate |
2025 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2025-02-28 |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.unifor.br/rpen/article/view/14815 10.5020/2317-2150.2025.14815 |
| url |
https://ojs.unifor.br/rpen/article/view/14815 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.5020/2317-2150.2025.14815 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
| language |
por eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.unifor.br/rpen/article/view/14815/8391 https://ojs.unifor.br/rpen/article/view/14815/8845 https://ojs.unifor.br/rpen/article/view/14815/8175 https://ojs.unifor.br/rpen/article/view/14815/8177 https://ojs.unifor.br/rpen/article/view/14815/8849 |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2025 Pensar - Revista de Ciências Jurídicas info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2025 Pensar - Revista de Ciências Jurídicas |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de Fortaleza |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de Fortaleza |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Legal Sciences; Vol. 30 (2025); 1-16 La Pensar - Revista de Ciencias Jurídicas; Vol. 30 (2025); 1-16 Pensar – Rivista di Scienze Giuridiche; V. 30 (2025); 1-16 Pensar - Revista de Ciências Jurídicas; v. 30 (2025); 1-16 2317-2150 1519-8464 reponame:Pensar (Fortaleza. Online) instname:Universidade de Fortaleza (UNIFOR) instacron:UNIFOR |
| instname_str |
Universidade de Fortaleza (UNIFOR) |
| instacron_str |
UNIFOR |
| institution |
UNIFOR |
| reponame_str |
Pensar (Fortaleza. Online) |
| collection |
Pensar (Fortaleza. Online) |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pensar (Fortaleza. Online) - Universidade de Fortaleza (UNIFOR) |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistapensar@unifor.br |
| _version_ |
1841453776196599808 |