Multiprofessional instrument for tracheal decannulation in adults: evidence of validity based on response processes
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2022 |
Other Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | por |
Source: | Research, Society and Development |
Download full: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/27348 |
Summary: | Objective: To obtain evidence of validity based on the response processes of the multidisciplinary instrument for tracheal decannulation in adults. Method: Three teams of evaluators participated in this research, which were composed of a professional from the areas that work in the tracheal decannulation process – Nursing, Physiotherapy, Speech Therapy and Medicine. There were two stages of the research: the first involved the application of the instrument by the teams to patients, with the same patient for the team and different patients between teams. In the second stage, a brief interview was carried out individually with each evaluator, to verify their perception of the applicability of the instrument. Result: Regarding the degree of relevance of each item presented in the instrument, greater agreement was observed between the responses by team. Regarding writing, the judges evaluated that the items of the instrument are presented in a clear and objective way. All professional evaluators considered the instrument applicable in clinical practice. Conclusion: The multidisciplinary instrument for tracheal decannulation in adults was validated through evidence-based response processes. |
id |
UNIFEI_2adf078daeb0ae1a7953882d1d2418e3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/27348 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Multiprofessional instrument for tracheal decannulation in adults: evidence of validity based on response processesInstrumento multiprofesional para decanulación traqueal en adultos: evidencia de validez basada en el proceso de respuestaInstrumento multiprofissional para decanulação traqueal em adultos: evidência de validade baseada nos processos de resposta TracheostomyMultiprofessional TeamValidation StudiesProtocols.TraqueostomiaEquipe MultiprofissionalEstudos de ValidaçãoProtocolos.TraqueotomíaEquipo MultiprofesionalEstudios de ValidaciónProtocolos.Objective: To obtain evidence of validity based on the response processes of the multidisciplinary instrument for tracheal decannulation in adults. Method: Three teams of evaluators participated in this research, which were composed of a professional from the areas that work in the tracheal decannulation process – Nursing, Physiotherapy, Speech Therapy and Medicine. There were two stages of the research: the first involved the application of the instrument by the teams to patients, with the same patient for the team and different patients between teams. In the second stage, a brief interview was carried out individually with each evaluator, to verify their perception of the applicability of the instrument. Result: Regarding the degree of relevance of each item presented in the instrument, greater agreement was observed between the responses by team. Regarding writing, the judges evaluated that the items of the instrument are presented in a clear and objective way. All professional evaluators considered the instrument applicable in clinical practice. Conclusion: The multidisciplinary instrument for tracheal decannulation in adults was validated through evidence-based response processes.Objetivo: Obtener evidencias de validez a partir de los procesos de respuesta del instrumento multidisciplinario para la decanulación traqueal en adultos. Método: En esta investigación participaron tres equipos de evaluadores, los cuales fueron compuestos por un profesional de las áreas que actúan en el proceso de decanulación traqueal – Enfermería, Fisioterapia, Fonoaudiología y Medicina. Hubo dos etapas de la investigación: la primera implicó la aplicación del instrumento por parte de los equipos a los pacientes, con el mismo paciente para el equipo y diferentes pacientes entre equipos. En la segunda etapa, se realizó una breve entrevista individual a cada evaluador, para verificar su percepción sobre la aplicabilidad del instrumento. Resultado: En cuanto al grado de relevancia de cada ítem presentado en el instrumento, se observó mayor concordancia entre las respuestas por equipo. En cuanto a la redacción, los jueces evaluaron que los ítems del instrumento se presenten de forma clara y objetiva. Todos los evaluadores profesionales consideraron el instrumento aplicable en la práctica clínica. Conclusión: El instrumento multidisciplinario para la decanulación traqueal en adultos fue validado a través de procesos de respuesta basados en evidencia.Objetivo: Obter a evidência de validade baseada nos processos de resposta do instrumento multiprofissional para decanulação traqueal em adultos. Método: Participaram desta pesquisa três equipes de avaliadores, as quais foram compostas por profissionais das áreas que atuam no processo de decanulação traqueal – Enfermagem, Fisioterapia, Fonoaudiologia e Medicina. A pesquisa aconteceu em duas etapas: a primeira, envolveu a aplicação do instrumento pelas equipes em pacientes, sendo o mesmo paciente para a equipe e pacientes diferentes entre equipes. Já a segunda etapa, foi realizada uma breve entrevista individualmente com cada avaliador, para verificar sua percepção sobre a aplicabilidade do instrumento. Resultado: Quanto ao grau de relevância de cada item apresentado no instrumento, foi observada maior concordância entre as respostas por equipe. Em relação à escrita, os juízes avaliaram que os itens do instrumento estão apresentados de maneira clara e objetiva. Todos os profissionais avaliadores consideraram o instrumento aplicável na prática clínica. Conclusão: O instrumento multiprofissional para decanulação traqueal em adultos foi validado, através das evidências baseadas nos processos de resposta.Research, Society and Development2022-03-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2734810.33448/rsd-v11i4.27348Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 4; e25311427348Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 4; e25311427348Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 4; e253114273482525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/27348/23880Copyright (c) 2022 Daniela Hencke; Isabel de Lima Zanata; Paulo Henrique Coltro; Tatiane Caroline Boumer; Rosane Sampaio Santoshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHencke, DanielaZanata, Isabel de Lima Coltro, Paulo HenriqueBoumer, Tatiane CarolineSantos, Rosane Sampaio 2022-03-27T17:17:09Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/27348Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:45:06.982065Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Multiprofessional instrument for tracheal decannulation in adults: evidence of validity based on response processes Instrumento multiprofesional para decanulación traqueal en adultos: evidencia de validez basada en el proceso de respuesta Instrumento multiprofissional para decanulação traqueal em adultos: evidência de validade baseada nos processos de resposta |
title |
Multiprofessional instrument for tracheal decannulation in adults: evidence of validity based on response processes |
spellingShingle |
Multiprofessional instrument for tracheal decannulation in adults: evidence of validity based on response processes Hencke, Daniela Tracheostomy Multiprofessional Team Validation Studies Protocols. Traqueostomia Equipe Multiprofissional Estudos de Validação Protocolos. Traqueotomía Equipo Multiprofesional Estudios de Validación Protocolos. |
title_short |
Multiprofessional instrument for tracheal decannulation in adults: evidence of validity based on response processes |
title_full |
Multiprofessional instrument for tracheal decannulation in adults: evidence of validity based on response processes |
title_fullStr |
Multiprofessional instrument for tracheal decannulation in adults: evidence of validity based on response processes |
title_full_unstemmed |
Multiprofessional instrument for tracheal decannulation in adults: evidence of validity based on response processes |
title_sort |
Multiprofessional instrument for tracheal decannulation in adults: evidence of validity based on response processes |
author |
Hencke, Daniela |
author_facet |
Hencke, Daniela Zanata, Isabel de Lima Coltro, Paulo Henrique Boumer, Tatiane Caroline Santos, Rosane Sampaio |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Zanata, Isabel de Lima Coltro, Paulo Henrique Boumer, Tatiane Caroline Santos, Rosane Sampaio |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Hencke, Daniela Zanata, Isabel de Lima Coltro, Paulo Henrique Boumer, Tatiane Caroline Santos, Rosane Sampaio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Tracheostomy Multiprofessional Team Validation Studies Protocols. Traqueostomia Equipe Multiprofissional Estudos de Validação Protocolos. Traqueotomía Equipo Multiprofesional Estudios de Validación Protocolos. |
topic |
Tracheostomy Multiprofessional Team Validation Studies Protocols. Traqueostomia Equipe Multiprofissional Estudos de Validação Protocolos. Traqueotomía Equipo Multiprofesional Estudios de Validación Protocolos. |
description |
Objective: To obtain evidence of validity based on the response processes of the multidisciplinary instrument for tracheal decannulation in adults. Method: Three teams of evaluators participated in this research, which were composed of a professional from the areas that work in the tracheal decannulation process – Nursing, Physiotherapy, Speech Therapy and Medicine. There were two stages of the research: the first involved the application of the instrument by the teams to patients, with the same patient for the team and different patients between teams. In the second stage, a brief interview was carried out individually with each evaluator, to verify their perception of the applicability of the instrument. Result: Regarding the degree of relevance of each item presented in the instrument, greater agreement was observed between the responses by team. Regarding writing, the judges evaluated that the items of the instrument are presented in a clear and objective way. All professional evaluators considered the instrument applicable in clinical practice. Conclusion: The multidisciplinary instrument for tracheal decannulation in adults was validated through evidence-based response processes. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-03-17 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/27348 10.33448/rsd-v11i4.27348 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/27348 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v11i4.27348 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/27348/23880 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 4; e25311427348 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 4; e25311427348 Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 4; e25311427348 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1831934898795970560 |