Identifying criteria for prioritizing process transformation projects
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2024 |
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | GEPROS. Gestão da Produção. Operações e Sistemas |
Download full: | https://revista.feb.unesp.br/gepros/article/view/3036 |
Summary: | Different processes exist within organizations and due to their particularities, which processes should be prioritized in improvement or transformation projects must be identified. Based on a literature review, this research raised 24 criteria for decision making in prioritizing processes in improvement and transformation projects. No indication of universal criteria which can be replicated in any and any organization has been identified in the literature. However, there was great relevance to strategic aspects of the organization. Among the most used criteria, strategic alignment, operating costs, financial return, innovation and quality stand out. All criteria were classified into 5 categories (strategy, financial, quality, impact on clients, and efficiency), then called macro criteria, and a generic hierarchical structure was proposed for multi-criteria decision making. In this generic structure, the criteria and macro criteria can be adapted by specialists or practitioners of the AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process), according to the application environment, by selecting criteria and/or macro criteria, as well as also assigning specific weights to these criteria and sub-criteria according to judgments provided by the method, method the framework for another multi-criteria method. |
id |
UNESP-2_07fe9b45a1851b977bb52bfda987c906 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.gepros.emnuvens.com.br:article/3036 |
network_acronym_str |
UNESP-2 |
network_name_str |
GEPROS. Gestão da Produção. Operações e Sistemas |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Identifying criteria for prioritizing process transformation projects CRITERIA AND GENERIC STRUCTURE PROPOSAL FOR PRIORITIZING PROCESS TRANSFORMATION PROJECTSPrioritization; Multicriteria; Process; Improvement; Transformation.Priorização; Multicritério; Processo; Melhoria; Transformação.Different processes exist within organizations and due to their particularities, which processes should be prioritized in improvement or transformation projects must be identified. Based on a literature review, this research raised 24 criteria for decision making in prioritizing processes in improvement and transformation projects. No indication of universal criteria which can be replicated in any and any organization has been identified in the literature. However, there was great relevance to strategic aspects of the organization. Among the most used criteria, strategic alignment, operating costs, financial return, innovation and quality stand out. All criteria were classified into 5 categories (strategy, financial, quality, impact on clients, and efficiency), then called macro criteria, and a generic hierarchical structure was proposed for multi-criteria decision making. In this generic structure, the criteria and macro criteria can be adapted by specialists or practitioners of the AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process), according to the application environment, by selecting criteria and/or macro criteria, as well as also assigning specific weights to these criteria and sub-criteria according to judgments provided by the method, method the framework for another multi-criteria method.Purpose – Considering that diverse processes and peculiarities are found across organizations, defining which processes are best suited for prioritization in improvement or transformation projects is vital. The aim of this study was to identify in the literature possible criteria to be considered when making decisions regarding the prioritization of processes to be included in the transformation activities of organizations. Design/methodology/approach – The present research, classified as qualitative and applied, has adopted the literature review process with the aim of identifying and analyzing articles drawn from the Web of Science, Scopus and Scielo databases relating to process prioritization criteria in transformation projects. Findings – A total of 24 criteria for decision-making when prioritizing processes in improvement and transformation projects were identified. The criteria were classified into 5 categories (strategy, financial, quality, impact on customers, and efficiency), and a generic hierarchical structure based on the AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) for multi-criteria decision-making is proposed. Originality/Value – Although no universal criteria were identified in the literature that could be adopted by any given organization, significant relevance was noted in terms of the strategic aspects of organizations. The generic structure proposed, establishing criteria and macro-criteria, can be adapted by specialists or AHP practitioners, depending on the type of organization or application environment. Keywords: Prioritization; Multicriteria; Process; Improvement; Transformation.A Fundacao para o Desenvolvimento de Bauru (FunDeB)2024-12-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.feb.unesp.br/gepros/article/view/303610.15675/gepros.3036Revista Gestão da Produção Operações e Sistemas; v. 1 (2024)1984-2430reponame:GEPROS. Gestão da Produção. Operações e Sistemasinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPenghttps://revista.feb.unesp.br/gepros/article/view/3036/2009Copyright (c) 2024 Diego Conte Costa Laurindo, Renato de Camposhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessConte Costa Laurindo, DiegoCampos, Renato de2024-12-17T16:56:38Zoai:ojs.gepros.emnuvens.com.br:article/3036Revistahttps://revista.feb.unesp.br/geprosPUBhttps://revista.feb.unesp.br/gepros/oaigepros@feb.unesp.br||abjabbour@feb.unesp.br1984-24301809-614Xopendoar:2024-12-17T16:56:38GEPROS. Gestão da Produção. Operações e Sistemas - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Identifying criteria for prioritizing process transformation projects CRITERIA AND GENERIC STRUCTURE PROPOSAL FOR PRIORITIZING PROCESS TRANSFORMATION PROJECTS |
title |
Identifying criteria for prioritizing process transformation projects |
spellingShingle |
Identifying criteria for prioritizing process transformation projects Conte Costa Laurindo, Diego Prioritization; Multicriteria; Process; Improvement; Transformation. Priorização; Multicritério; Processo; Melhoria; Transformação. |
title_short |
Identifying criteria for prioritizing process transformation projects |
title_full |
Identifying criteria for prioritizing process transformation projects |
title_fullStr |
Identifying criteria for prioritizing process transformation projects |
title_full_unstemmed |
Identifying criteria for prioritizing process transformation projects |
title_sort |
Identifying criteria for prioritizing process transformation projects |
author |
Conte Costa Laurindo, Diego |
author_facet |
Conte Costa Laurindo, Diego Campos, Renato de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Campos, Renato de |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Conte Costa Laurindo, Diego Campos, Renato de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Prioritization; Multicriteria; Process; Improvement; Transformation. Priorização; Multicritério; Processo; Melhoria; Transformação. |
topic |
Prioritization; Multicriteria; Process; Improvement; Transformation. Priorização; Multicritério; Processo; Melhoria; Transformação. |
description |
Different processes exist within organizations and due to their particularities, which processes should be prioritized in improvement or transformation projects must be identified. Based on a literature review, this research raised 24 criteria for decision making in prioritizing processes in improvement and transformation projects. No indication of universal criteria which can be replicated in any and any organization has been identified in the literature. However, there was great relevance to strategic aspects of the organization. Among the most used criteria, strategic alignment, operating costs, financial return, innovation and quality stand out. All criteria were classified into 5 categories (strategy, financial, quality, impact on clients, and efficiency), then called macro criteria, and a generic hierarchical structure was proposed for multi-criteria decision making. In this generic structure, the criteria and macro criteria can be adapted by specialists or practitioners of the AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process), according to the application environment, by selecting criteria and/or macro criteria, as well as also assigning specific weights to these criteria and sub-criteria according to judgments provided by the method, method the framework for another multi-criteria method. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-12-16 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.feb.unesp.br/gepros/article/view/3036 10.15675/gepros.3036 |
url |
https://revista.feb.unesp.br/gepros/article/view/3036 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15675/gepros.3036 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.feb.unesp.br/gepros/article/view/3036/2009 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 Diego Conte Costa Laurindo, Renato de Campos http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 Diego Conte Costa Laurindo, Renato de Campos http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
A Fundacao para o Desenvolvimento de Bauru (FunDeB) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
A Fundacao para o Desenvolvimento de Bauru (FunDeB) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Gestão da Produção Operações e Sistemas; v. 1 (2024) 1984-2430 reponame:GEPROS. Gestão da Produção. Operações e Sistemas instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
GEPROS. Gestão da Produção. Operações e Sistemas |
collection |
GEPROS. Gestão da Produção. Operações e Sistemas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
GEPROS. Gestão da Produção. Operações e Sistemas - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
gepros@feb.unesp.br||abjabbour@feb.unesp.br |
_version_ |
1824500436195868672 |